We've got a lot of accounts from Western European nations musing about the new world (the conquistador's chronicles, of course, but also texts written by people who never did the travel, like Montaigne), but are there any such texts written by people who were not western european?
How did they understand the "New World" from their cultural perspectives?
Japanese Confucian scholar and politician Hakuseki Arai (1657-1725) certainly wrote Seiyō Kibun in 3 volumes, mainly based on his interrogation record on Italian Jesuit missionary Giovanni Battista Sidotti (d. 1714) [as well as apparently Dutch informants] some , and it also includes a short paragraphs on both North and South Americas (called ノヲルト・アメリカ (Noord Amerika) and ソイデ・アメリカ (Suid(e) Amerika) apparently in the local rendering of Dutch pronunciation) among various countries across the Globe.
Thus, his work is not a first-hand account of the New World, rather a reception of European knowledge of the world at that period (Compared with the section on SE Asian and "African" countries (Ottoman Empire occupied its most part), Hakuseki does not show special interest in Americas, based on the relative length of the section)), though he sometimes compare alleged Siddotti's information with the world map (Kunyu Wanguo Quantu『坤輿萬國全圖』) brought to the Asians by Jesuit Matteo Ricci in 1602 as well as some other (newer) Dutch world map. Actually he describes rather on "Nova Hollandia" (Australia) in details, with some interesting comments/ attitude of Sidotti.
While this Seiyō Kibun had not officially been published before Meiji Reformation in 1868 and its copy & circulation had been forbidden at least in the 18th century Japan, the work was actually permitted to be circulated and read in the last few decades in Edo Period in the 19th century.
+++
Anyway, the following very brief passages are the excerpted summary of the First peoples in north and south Americas in Seiyō Kibun:
A few Jesuits are also certainly known to keep on the imperial courts in Beijing in Qing China from the late 17th to the 18th centuries and some cultural exchanges like the comparison of historical writings and musics also happened there (Cf. Arai 2017), but I know not enough on the possible reception of this kind of geographical knowledge by the Chinese intellectuals after Matteo Ricci's case, sorry.
References:
+++
(Edited): improves a clumsy translation of the source at least a little.