Why didn´t the Bolsheviks (or the Duma under Kerensky) try Nicholas?

by Awesomeuser90

Nicholas had actually agreed to a constitution and had legal limits. Putting kings on trial had precedent by that point, like the deposition of Louis XVI of France and Charles I of England.

I imagine that the Bolsheviks or the Duma would have obtained a guilty verdict somehow, whether for things Nicholas actually did or trumped up charges, with less risk of a backlash if they executed him instead of a more assassination style killing of the imperial family.

Daja_Kisubo

u/kieslowskifan outlines some of the reasons why a trial did not occur in the following comment.

https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/66bft7/why_were_the_bolsheviks_who_were_fighting_a_civil/dgno79w