This mostly a relatively recent (i.e. XIXth century) take on the battle seeing it as a gigantic gamble for the future of Europe and mirroring a supposedly unavoidable confrontation between Christendom and Islam as much as the Crusades, the Turkish wars and of course colonisation.

But one that doesn't hold much water going trough the primary sources, to the point XXth revisionist historians as Henri Pirenne described the battle as "a mere raid" : if interested, you might want to get a look at this previous answer.

Basically, the current consensus still pretty much acknowledges its importance along the two other battles of Toulouse (717) and La Berre (737), especially when it comes to how it cemented Carolingian power in Francia even while Arabo-Berber raids and expeditions never really stopped after the mid-VIIIth century.