Was it considered inappropriate for Winston Churchill to wear a "Siren Suit" to the White House during his 1943 visit?

by RusticBohemian

Churchill at the White House in his "siren suit".

Everyone else was dressed more formally in suits and dresses. Did anyone complain that Churchill was in his "siren suit," which was little different from a aviator's jumpsuit? Was he wearing it to emphasize the wartime footing of his nation, in which normal notions of formality should be cast aside?

[deleted]

When Churchill visited the White House in the winter of 1941-42, his sartorial choices were indeed the subject of commentary. Life Magazine published a brief feature on Churchill's siren suit, which attracted great interest when Churchill took a stroll in the White House Garden with Harry Hopkins and his daughter Diana, President Roosevelt's dog Fala, and his naval aide, Commander Charles Ralfe Thompson. Churchill boasted of the suit's practicality, remarking, "I can get into it in half a minute." In all, Churchill seems to have been pleased by the publicity.

Churchill's siren suits were of his own design: one was made by his Jermyn Street tailor, Turnbull & Asser, from bottle green velvet. Others were made in burgundy and Air Force blue. With breast and side pockets and generously cut, the siren suit (though the rest of Churchill's staff referred to them as his "rompers") was designed to be donned swiftly out of convenience should the wearer suddenly be forced out of bed by a German air raid.

As for the fate of Churchill's suits, his grey wool pinstriped siren suit was sold at auction in 2002 for the princely sum of £29,875. Another made out of velvet is on display at Churchill's home Chartwell, complete with a pair of his monogrammed slippers.

Sources:

Andrew Roberts, Churchill: Walking With Destiny