Hi, I am getting a tattoo soon of the Ancient Greek mosaic uncovered in Turkey’s Hatay Province of a reclining skeleton, with the text saying ”ΕΥΦΡΟΣΥΝΟΣ” which numerous sources translate as “Be cheerful, enjoy your life” But I wanted to ask to double check the translation with anyone who can read Ancient Greek is possible? Thank you in advance!
1 Answers 2020-08-24
As examples look at Latin America and US and Australia.
It was very common for the Spanish to create families with the indigenous populations, to the point many people in Latin America consider themselves descendants of both Europeans and ancient civilization (like Aztecs or Mayans) but that didn’t really happen in British colonies like Australia or the US. To this day the majority of their population is “European descent”. Why was that? Why was mixing between Europeans and Native Americans so uncommon in places not colonized by Spain?
Not complaining or anything, just legit curiosity about the differences between colonial powers
1 Answers 2020-08-24
2 Answers 2020-08-24
1 Answers 2020-08-24
I ask this since it was common to decorate planes with writings and drawings, and there would be no point in doing this if you used the plane for only one mission and then great on a new one. And also what did "Enola gay" mean, and why was it on the bomber carri g the atomic bomb?
1 Answers 2020-08-24
Yesterday I bought a local "popular science and history" magazine - think something like the equivalent of National Geographic Magazine only it turned up to be a bit more yellow than just around the borders. Their main article was about human sacrifice in the Aztec culture - it had the thesis that popular theories that conquistadors, guns, germs and steel were the main source of the Aztec downfall were not right, but instead the Aztecs' fascination with human sacrifice, death culture had driven them to kill off their own people in such huge numbers that they had basically sabotaged their society by the time conquistadors came, and this was the most important factor for their apparent weakness when meeting the conquistadors and giving in to the later triple-punch of guns, germs and steel.
Now I won't comment further on this article, because it became quickly apparent it's pretty garbage and they didn't want to cite any sources for many of their claims, had plenty of "recently historians have found" or "historians agree" and etc. blanket statements.
What incensed me most was a claim that "according to many historians today Aztecs sacrificed close to 250,000 people for a year in the whole empire". This cannot be, I thought, that's the most ludicrous claim of all in this article. I'm going to check on the internet where they sourced this crazy number from, and laugh at their poor researching skills...
Imagine the egg on my face when of the mish-mash of all unsourced facts in this article this turned out to be an actual estimation made in the 1970s by Dr. Woodrow Borah, an authority on the demography of ancient Mexico at the University of California, Berkeley. Who among other estimations also considered that these 250,000 humans sacrificed a year made up about 1% of the population of the Aztec Empire at the time.
https://archive.org/details/naturalhistory86newy/page/n353 https://www.nytimes.com/1977/02/19/archives/aztec-sacrifices-laid-to-hunger-not-just-religion.html#:~:text=by%20the%20Aztecs.-,Dr.,region's%20population%20of%2025%20million.
So here's my question - how accurate or inaccurate are considered today these estimations of a chilling number of human sacrifice victims? Do "many historians today agree" these are credible estimations? 40+ years have passed, surely there have been more findings about human sacrifice that either support this thesis or cast doubt over it?
A quick read through Wikipedia found the same 250k estimation repeated, plus one or two other wildly differing estimates, but no hint which one is considered more accurate by the majority of modern historians. If anyone can tell me if there is a consensus which is closer to plausible, and which is considered improbable, plus any sources and modern estimations - I would be forever thankful.
2 Answers 2020-08-24
My grandmother (who was a history teacher) told me a story where after signing the Turkish - German friendship treaty, Hitler intended to secure the straits or Thrace before launching Barbarossa, however in the nick of time İnönü blew up a bridge and the Germans launched their invasion of the USSR without the straits secured.
However I can only find information saying that a bridge was blown up between that 3 day time period of the signing of the friendship treaty and Barbarossa, and can't find information of an imminent occupation force. If this story is true, did the Germans technically cross the border into Turkey and turn back at the sight of the river?
1 Answers 2020-08-24
On the wikipedia page Occupation of Japan it says: "Unlike in the occupation of Germany, the Soviet Union was allowed little to no influence over Japan." But gives no references or explanation.
I tried searching online for anything relating to this and I only managed to find 1 article on the subject. Read it here.
It basically says it might be because the Soviets were intimidated by the atomic bombs, but then "disproves" that by giving counter examples of other areas at the time where they refused to be intimidated into making concessions even under explicit threat of being nuked.
It then says: "Attractive for geopolitical reasons, Hokkaido was not part of the deal agreed upon at Yalta in February 1945. Stalin knew that by violating this agreement, he risked undermining Soviet gains in the Far East, including possession of southern Sakhalin and the Kuril Islands."
This makes a lot of sense, but then it says further on that Stalin changed his mind on the matter later on. Maybe it was too late by that point? I don't know.
I am very interested in this topic. Does anyone have any links or insight that they could share? I would appreciate it.
1 Answers 2020-08-24
This is not exactly the sort of question I normally see on r/AskHistorians, but I think people here are the ones who can answer it best. What is a good way to find good material (specifically books) to learn about a historical topic? Is there a better way than googling "books crusades" and starting from the top? How does one decide what book is worth reading first?
And does anyone have advice on good books for an interested non-historian, that cover the crusades from an economical/social point of view? I'm not (or better, not only) interested in what crusaders did while crusading, but in how and why crusades were started, funded, and "advertised".
As a more typical question: What was the public opinion (among rural and city people, not nobles or clergy) about the crusades? Were they seen as a holy and noble endeavour, or just as another type of warfare and reason for more taxes, with the only possible added bonus that at least a lot of it was done away from their fields? Did this opinion change substantially between countries, or between the different crusades?
2 Answers 2020-08-24
1 Answers 2020-08-24
I have often heard people say that nations did not really exist in their current form before approximately the 19th century, and that the modern conception that nations have basically always existed is a lie. I don’t understand what that means and I was hoping to get perspective on what that really means for institutions such as the English & French Monarchies or the Roman & Ottoman Empires. How were these different from the current conception of a nation and why are they not considered to be one by many teachers/ casual history lovers?
3 Answers 2020-08-24
Hi I have seen this poster known as “comrades of steel” on amazon etc, and it’s supposed to be a Soviet era poster however I can not see any sources of it anywhere and I saw one comment saying it was a spoof poster or meant to be in the style of the soviet era but not actually being a soviet poster https://www.amazon.co.uk/Vintage-Russian-Propaganda-COMRADES-Reproduction/dp/B007JSYJA8. this is the link to it on amazon, any help would be greatly appreciated!
2 Answers 2020-08-24
Europe seems to be filled with ancient rock structures like Stonehenge, passage tombs, stone circles, megaliths, dolmens, etc. Besides dirt structures like Cahokia and the other mound building cultures, why don't we see that in North America?
1 Answers 2020-08-24
What criteria needs to be fulfilled before someone decides a work is 'lost'?
1 Answers 2020-08-24
1 Answers 2020-08-24
I was wondering what they did. The south has tornados and droughts, the north blizzards, the East hurricanes, the west earthquakes. I know these people had extensive histories and protocols. I’m not taught anything about the natives before colonization in school so there’s no way of me learning about this other than asking specifically.
2 Answers 2020-08-24
I got the idea watching Vikings which IK not the most historically accurate but some of it I believe gives a decent look at events and culture after looking into it.
Anyways in the beginning they discover a land west (England) after poor raiding to the East for a while due to their neighbors being pretty poor. However England is a much richer land and they come back very successful with lots of gold. It got me to thinking how does a small poor village handle an increase in wealth like that? The raid has not really created much of any positive economic activity (no goods or services produced) but has brought a lot of currency. Did this result in inflation? Were the raids beneficial to Vikings?
Also feel free to answer with the affect on any people that raided and brought back gold to their area as IK Vikings written history is very scarce. Mostly want to know how stealing things like gold or silver on a large scale would help/affect an economy when nothing with real value (practical use) came out of raiding other people.
1 Answers 2020-08-24
My father is a retired mathematician who loves to immerse himself in history documentaries, particularly around wartime or famous figures. He loves historical gossip - i.e. things most people don't realise about past events and people. Start with someone nearly everyone's heard of, and add something interesting about them that most people wouldn't know. Then write it in a whimsical style, and he's happy as Larry.
Any recommendations, please?
2 Answers 2020-08-24
Throughout the Americas, there are Afro-American religions (Voodoo, Hoodoo, Santeria, Umbanda, Candomble, Espiritismo, Palo Mayombe, Xango, etc.) As can be seen on this map, these Afro-American religions are derived from a wide variety of traditional, ethnic religions that can be found in West and Central Africa.
However, I know that approximately 1/3rd of enslaved Africans brought to the Americas were Muslim. Wolof and Mande peoples are notable examples of such ethnic groups who were represented in the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade and were also Muslim. Though this is not the majority religion, I would guess that it was a plurality religion. As a singular religious faith, I assume that Islam was the most professed religion amongst enslaved peoples brought to the Americas, precisely because there is not one singular West African Traditional Religion.
Why don't we see Islam (or Islamic-derived practices) persisting in the Americas in the way we see beliefs, rituals, and practices from Traditional African religions? I imagine that it would be much easier to "combine" Islam with Christianity than the various traditional religions which have been syncretized with Christianity in the Americas, so why do these persist in Brazil, the Caribbean, and parts of the United States where West African Islamic traditions are virtually invisible?
EDIT: Sorry for the typo. I tried rewording the question a lot and the weird apostrophe is a relict of a prior wording.
1 Answers 2020-08-24
I’m about to read the author Tom Holland’s ‘Dominion: The Making of the Western Mind‘ and it has good reviews but I’ve noticed that his older books, especially the one on early Islam, get a bad rap around here. Should I be concerned about bad history in Dominion? Are there better works on the role of Christianity in the west that are also readable?
1 Answers 2020-08-24
It boggles my mind that the Mekong delta used to be majority Cambodian since it's such a Vietnamese place. Did private farming families move in or was it a government program or a combination of both?
1 Answers 2020-08-24
Edit: To clarify some things. Let's take Italy as an example. Regions might include Venice, Florence, Milan or Rome
1 Answers 2020-08-24
I am looking for an old machine which was used to teach children the piano. It looks awful and it's meant to control every little finger. The children were put in there and the machine controlled their arms and fingers.
Looks more like a torture machine, but I heard Clara Schuhmann was raised with one. I am looking for a picture of it, since I want to show it to a friend who doesn't believe me. It was build by one man in the 18th or 19th century.
I try to search the web, but all I find are "Best apps to learn the piano" and stuff.
Anybody here knows what I am talking about?
2 Answers 2020-08-24