Image: https://imgur.com/a/2QWNCfD

My third cousin and I are attempting to identify the soldier in the photo. We assume he is a member of our family, which narrows it down considerably to a list of possible identities, but we want to be sure. We also don't know enough about WWI and its military uniforms & style to really even know where to begin. That said, I have tried to do some basic research based on a few assumptions, and here's what I've come up with:

• Because this part of our family is Italian, I assumed that the man in the photograph is Italian, and looked up Italian WWI uniforms to corroborate that assumption. That assumption would appear to be correct. For the sake of certainty, what do you all think? Is the man in the photograph an Italian soldier, or were there other countries whose military outfits looked like that during WWI? If so, what countries?

• I assumed that the "74" on his cap refers to his regiment. I researched regiment 74, and came up with the Lombardia Brigade. However, at first glance, this seems wrong, because our family is from a little town in Torino, and Torino doesn't appear to be part of the 74th Regiment's Recruitment District. Furthermore, none of our relatives' names appear on that website. That said, those names all appear to pertain to folks who died in the war, and not all of our relatives who fought in WWI died during WWI. Plus, I think the list could be incomplete. Does the "74" on the man's cap definitively refer to his regiment? Could it be incorrect somehow? Could it be possible for someone from the province of Torino to have ended up in a regiment with no recruitment jurisdiction in Torino, and how? Is there someplace I can find a roster of all Italian WWI soldiers, so that once I confirm his regiment I might possibly confirm his identity?

• According to this, depending on the color of the star, a single star rank either pertains to a 2nd Lieutenant, or a Brigadier General. The 2nd Lieutenant star is gold, and the Brigadier General star is silver. I assume that the man depicted was a 2nd Lieutenant at the time the photograph was taken. Considering the ranks' corresponding star colors, the fact that at the time only black and white photography existed, and that his stars appear to be darkened in the photograph by a photo-"editing" technique of the time, I'm basing my assumption of the man's rank off the conclusion that gold stars would probably have been darkened in photography, while silver stars lightened. Is that logic sound, or is there other logic that supports the idea that the man in the photo is a 2nd Lieutenant, and can I therefore consider it beyond a reasonable doubt that the man depicted in the photograph was a 2nd Lieutenant at the time the photograph was taken?

Thank you very much for any and all help you guys can give me! I apologize in advance if these questions don't belong here. If that is the case, please [if possible] direct me to a better subreddit for my research! Thank you!

Clip here: https://youtu.be/4eDPyvyt-MQ?t=23m58s Old 666: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_666

Previous weeks!

Please Be Aware: We expect everyone to read the rules and guidelines of this thread. Mods will remove questions which we deem to be too involved for the theme in place here. We will remove answers which don't include a source. These removals will be without notice. Please follow the rules.

Some questions people have just don't require depth. This thread is a recurring feature intended to provide a space for those simple, straight forward questions that are otherwise unsuited for the format of the subreddit.

Here are the ground rules:

• Top Level Posts should be questions in their own right.

• Questions should be clear and specific in the information that they are asking for.

• Questions which ask about broader concepts may be removed at the discretion of the Mod Team and redirected to post as a standalone question.

• We realize that in some cases, users may pose questions that they don't realize are more complicated than they think. In these cases, we will suggest reposting as a stand-alone question.

• Answers MUST be properly sourced to respectable literature. Unlike regular questions in the sub where sources are only required upon request, the lack of a source will result in removal of the answer.

• Academic secondary sources are prefered. Tertiary sources are acceptable if they are of academic rigor (such as a book from the 'Oxford Companion' series, or a reference work from an academic press).

• The only rule being relaxed here is with regard to depth, insofar as the anticipated questions are ones which do not require it. All other rules of the subreddit are in force.

edit: The full text for anyone interested