His record says he fought in _______, Flanders, between 15 October 1915 and 28 March 1916. He started that campaign with the 6/23 Infantrie Regiment and was seemingly transferred to the Infanterie Abteilung 1/19th Pioneer Regment. I'd like to know what that place was in Flanders and some place where I could find out more about those units. Thanks.
1 Answers 2018-02-21
5 Answers 2018-02-21
I can't think of any examples of "pitch" meaning distance or separation. Is it because of how CRT monitors originally operated, where the rays could be measured in angle differences?
1 Answers 2018-02-21
https://www.quora.com/Why-did-Japan-lose-its-technology-leadership-to-other-countries-like-the-US
from "Tisho Yanchev"
Japan never had a technology leadership, that’s just a facade they portray for the world to see and think of them, in reality, Japan is extremely backwards in terms of technology, they always were, they still use fax machines to communicate, and most computers still use IE, if you have lived in Japan you would know that. They put millions into robotics just to produce a good looking robot that is completely 100% useless and can’t do anything other than look nice and futuristic, try comparing the Boston Dynamics robots versus any robot produced in Japan, see the difference for yourself, during the Fukushima disaster, they didn’t have any robot to send there that could be of any use, all their robots can only smile, sing and look cool, but can’t do anything practical. I have done extensive research and i can say with confidence that everything you see in Japan is a copy cat of America or Europe, when the American companies literally created the gaming industry, beginning from the first Arcade games, Nintendo wasn’t even a gaming company, they became a gaming company only after they acquired a license to distribute the American games in Japan. If you look at the early models of Honda, Toyota and their car brands, they are 100% copy cat from the Europeans, mostly the Germans and French. Their movie ‘’hits’’ were too all copies from the American movies. Japan has invented nothing, and copied everything. They copy something created someplace else, change few elements, and then popularize it to the world as their own invention. They have successfully created the myth that they are technologically advanced, because it is in the core of their culture to focus on the image other than the content, they focus on making things look good, rather than actually BE good, they put so much efforts to create this false and twisted image (mask) of themselves and it works apparently. Everything is about the image in Japan, not the content. Anyone who has lived there knows this.
from "Martin Basinger"
This pattern is at the base of the Japanese economic boom as well as the Chinese economic boom of the last few decades - Western companies contract East Asian suppliers, and see their IP stolen and copied as a side effect. Most Japanese have forgotten that most of the wealth Japan was able to amass during their economic bubble was not earned through legal means.
It seems like a western exceptionalist (even white supremacist) argument made to downplay any achievements by Japanese people or other Asians.
1 Answers 2018-02-21
You know, Olympians win bronze/silver/gold medals, war veterans can be awarded medals of valor, etc
I was having trouble finding info about this practice, and I was wondering how long people have been doing this.
1 Answers 2018-02-21
Today people tend to say the way Islamic countries treat women and girls is "medieval". Thinking about that made me wonder how actual medieval Muslims treated women (or in this case girls) who have sex out of wedlock, and how it compares to how they're treated in places like Saudi Arabia or Iran today?
1 Answers 2018-02-21
I mean, how hard can it be to make some ports, build up some cities, get some high tech industry and start trading with Japan and SK?
I know it is not that easy. That is why Im asking.
thanks
1 Answers 2018-02-21
Please Be Aware: We expect everyone to read the rules and guidelines of this thread. Mods will remove questions which we deem to be too involved for the theme in place here. We will remove answers which don't include a source. These removals will be without notice. Please follow the rules.
Some questions people have just don't require depth. This thread is a recurring feature intended to provide a space for those simple, straight forward questions that are otherwise unsuited for the format of the subreddit.
Here are the ground rules:
Top Level Posts should be questions in their own right.
Questions should be clear and specific in the information that they are asking for.
Questions which ask about broader concepts may be removed at the discretion of the Mod Team and redirected to post as a standalone question.
We realize that in some cases, users may pose questions that they don't realize are more complicated than they think. In these cases, we will suggest reposting as a stand-alone question.
Answers MUST be properly sourced to respectable literature. Unlike regular questions in the sub where sources are only required upon request, the lack of a source will result in removal of the answer.
Academic secondary sources are prefered. Tertiary sources are acceptable if they are of academic rigor (such as a book from the 'Oxford Companion' series, or a reference work from an academic press).
The only rule being relaxed here is with regard to depth, insofar as the anticipated questions are ones which do not require it. All other rules of the subreddit are in force.
25 Answers 2018-02-21
Many historians today from Yale, Oxford and so on consider the Ancient Macedonians as an Ancient Greek Kingdom ((which i'm not trying to debunk)).
However Demosthenes refers to Philip/Macedonians as barbarians, which was before Philips conquest if I remember correctly.
Also was the term Barbarian not used to describe those who where non Greek. Was this mere political rhetoric to further his agenda? Ancient Macedonians did speak a different dialect known as Doric Greek which too my knowledge was unrecognizable to Southern Greeks so could this have been part of his reasoning?
1 Answers 2018-02-21
[deleted]
1 Answers 2018-02-21
Ive learned quite a bit about the main Frenchmen of the revolution such as Lafayette but what influence did the country as a whole have?
2 Answers 2018-02-21
Sorry for the typo in the question, I can't edit that.
1 Answers 2018-02-21
Since, the days are very short, just 5-6 hrs, What would people do the whole day, during winters in North Scandinavia region before modern amenities ? Did they all migrate to southern regions ? I am thinking of Viking period or maybe even earlier.
1 Answers 2018-02-21
[deleted]
1 Answers 2018-02-21
It's pretty well documented that the Americans wanted greater control over Canadian territory and were generally upset with how the British treated America as a power. What I would like to know what the British were thinking when they were attacked. Was it an entirely defensive war for the British or did they want to take back the colonies?
2 Answers 2018-02-21
[deleted]
1 Answers 2018-02-21
5 Answers 2018-02-21
1 Answers 2018-02-21
1 Answers 2018-02-21
1 Answers 2018-02-21
Love poetry and courtship are often thought of as important parts of Medieval love amongst the nobility, but political marriages seem to be quite common. Is the importance of courtship just a result of romanticizing the Medieval Period or did suitors really try to woo one another with love poetry and such? Did future couples typically even meet before their marriage?
1 Answers 2018-02-21
In 1956, Nikita Khrushchev gave his "secret speech", On the Cult of Personality and Its Consequences, at the 20th Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.
The speech was given in late February, and by early March it was being read at thousands of Communist party gatherings that included non-Communists, making tens of thousands of people aware of it contents. By mid-April Israeli agents got their hands on it, and in June the CIA leaked it to the New York Times.
In the just-released Rise and Kill First: The Secret History of Israel's Targeted Assassinations Hardcover (very good so far!), Ronon Bergman writes:
Israel had begun to merge as an intelligence power in 1956, after Nikita Krushchev gave a secret speech to the Twentieth Communist Party Congress in which he spoke frankly about the crimes committed by his predecessor, Joseph Stalin. Every spy outfit in the Western world was anxious to obtain the text, to study it for clues to Krushchev's mindset, but none of them could penetrate the Soviet Union's iron veil of secrecy. It was Israeli intelligence that succeeded, and Isser Harel ordered that a copy of the speech be handed to the CIA.
The agency's impressed and grateful director, Allen Dulles, passed it on to President Dwight Eisenhower, who then ordered that it be leaked to The New York Times. The publication stirred up a global storm and greatly embarrassed the Soviet Union.
I have a few questions.
Why weren't the United States or other Western powers able to get the text before Israel?
Did the Mossad/Shin Bet rise in the estimation of other intelligence agencies because they were able to get the text of the speech?
Did publication of the speech really stir up global story, and if it embarrassed the Soviet Union why did leadership disseminate it throughout the party?
Edit: Just a fabulous grammatically correct title I gave this.
1 Answers 2018-02-21
I got that tidbit about the NRA's history from here.
From what I understand about Civil War combat, accuracy wasn't much better than in the Napoleonic wars despite the proliferation of rifled muskets and the vast majority of shots missed due to a combination of smoke, panic, and stress. Were aimed shots a big factor? Does this tie into the 'cult of marksmanship?'
1 Answers 2018-02-21
This question may be based on a wrong presumption, but it appears like the start of the "Imperial" phase of Rome's history with the Julio-Claudian dynasty sparked a more overt phase of scheming, assassination, and infighting compared to other phases in Rome's history.
Specifically, I am interested in how most or all of the natural heirs or even the favored adopted heirs were killed early, and likely murdered. For example, most of Augustus' heirs were killed, and Agrippa's lineage was wiped out, all in front of his eyes. This didn't seem unique to any particular emperor. Was this scheming/infighting the start of a new form of politics? Or was it already within Rome's political norms?
1 Answers 2018-02-21
Whenever I look at high level athletes from even the 70s they’re almost always no where near as ripped as athletes of today. Was this true of athletes in Ancient Greece? Given their access to quality foods, as well as their lack of nutritional knowledge, what frame of reference for physique did Greeks use?
1 Answers 2018-02-21