I am aware of the head of the household impregnating slave women, but was it formally legal or accepted for slaves to have children among their own class/caste/population? (I'm sure it happened either way, but was kinda wondering about how accepted it was.)
1 Answers 2017-11-03
At Valley Forge, the Continental Army struggled to get through the cold winter weather. Warm clothes seem to be an extremely cheap item to obtain.
Why did the Continental Army struggle so much just to get shoes and clothes? Were they more expensive back in the time period? Was there a shortage? If so, what caused the shortage?
It's hard to believe difficulty they had of obtaining clothes/shoes to keep warm, especially from a modern perspective, where these things are easily able to be purchased for a cheap price.
2 Answers 2017-11-03
The votes are in!
Taking top honors this month not only in both flair and user voting but also, by my recollection, in one of the clearest margins yet, was /u/mikedash with his thorough tackling of the question "Why did Poland have lower rates of Black Death than other European countries during the 1300s?"
Taking the second award was/u/bigfridge224 for their response to "I hear a lot about the everyday use of "curses", charms and other magic in ancient Rome and Greece, some is superficially similar to Voodoo, but I still wonder how the occult was seen in these societies. In the spirit of Halloween can someone tell me?"
And next, winning the "Dark Horse" award recognizing the highest voted non-flair answer of the month is /u/FoucaultMeMichel, who answered the question "How did "white people" become one race in the United States when there used to be so many nationality distinctions?"
Finally, last month we introduced the "Excellence in Flairdom" award, intended to recognize especially exceptional contributions by a user to the subreddit and its community. The October Special Edition Excellence in Flairdom Lifetime Achievement Award goes to the immortal /u/kieslowskifan! Kieslowskifan could win this award every month, which is precisely the point. Are they even capable of writing answers not worthy of Twitter and the Sunday Digest? In follow-up questions, they range far afield of the original answers with just as much knowledge of the history and historiography, and six additional book recommendations in at least two languages. They're just as sharp in follow-ups to questions where they didn't have the top-level answer! And wonderfully, rather than get frustrated with repeat questions, kieslowskifan is always on game reposting their earlier work. Thank you, kieslowskifan!
So as always, a big congratulations to the winners, and a big thanks to everyone who contributed to the subreddit in the past month! Also a reminder, if you want to nominate answers for the monthly awards, the best way to do so is to submit your favorite posts every week to the Sunday Digest!
For a list of past winners, check out this Wiki page!.
7 Answers 2017-11-03
1 Answers 2017-11-03
I need to confirm something on page 148. Is there indeed a fact such as US navy ship USS Bancroft went to port of Izmir, Ottoman Empire in 1897 and got attacked?
2 Answers 2017-11-03
Aramaic, Greek, Arabic were Lingua Franca in the Middle East and Arabic even became the daily language for many. Why didn’t Turkish ever replace Arabic?
2 Answers 2017-11-03
Hello all!
I was researching for a relatively short and light paper when I came across a quote; I loved it! Perfectly fit the paper, easy to cut down, but alas....no citation other than "Adolf Hitler, 1938". I did some digging - tons of websites, books, and articles quote this speech. Some offer a few more details; the speech allegedly occurred in November, 1938, was given to the Reichstag, and is referred to somewhat consistently as Hitler "addressing" the Reichstag.
Here's the quote: "These boys and girls enter our organizations [at] ten years of age, and often for the first time get a little fresh air; after four years of the Young Folk they go on to the Hitler Youth, where we have them for another four years . . . And even if they are still not complete National Socialists, they go to Labor Service and are smoothed out there for another six, seven months . . . And whatever class consciousness or social status might still be left . . . the Wehrmacht [armed forces] will take care of that."
While the original speech details would be much appreciated, my large question is one of personal interest, not academic assistance. Did Hitler give informal addresses, speeches, etc. regularly? How did this play into parliamentary power dynamics, oaths of allegiance, and the general air of power that he seemed to try to maintain?
Thanks!
1 Answers 2017-11-03
1 Answers 2017-11-03
Say if I was living in ancient Rome/Athens/Alexandria and I had a small house or lived in an apartment. Did I have a key to get into my front door? What prevented people in the urban areas from just getting their stuff stolen all the time?
2 Answers 2017-11-03
Were gambesons, or any other padded/quilted defensive armor, in use with the Roman Empire? If so, were these worn by Celtic or Germanic warriors?
1 Answers 2017-11-03
1 Answers 2017-11-03
There was a recent discussion, "Why does everyone murder Mongol envoys?", where /u/UpperLowerEastSide wrote, "one of the large drivers determining where the Mongols initially expanded was who angered them; this includes executing the envoys".
A much older discussion, "I've been reading some mongol letters to unconquered nations, what are other good exmaples of threatening/insulting historical correspondence?", was started by /u/questionsofscience quoting Guyuk Khan's response to a letter of Pope Innocent IV: "Chinggis Khan and the Great Khan Ögedey have both transmitted the order of the Eternal God that the all the world should be subordinated to the Mongols to be taken note of." [sic]
I dimly recall the ancient Roman Republic had a concept that their wars had to be justifiable -- though I would guess that often enough "I want glory and loot" prompted a pretext for "just". And Wikipedia on "Just War" mentions a discussion in the Mahabharata.
This question is not "example seeking", nefas under The Rules. But I can note these previous discussions with a few examples:
(But lots of "0 comments" questions shown by a search for "just war".)
I'm asking about existing books (or articles or whatnot) on a more comprehensive level, of what "just war" meant in a number of cultures, maybe comparing and contrasting them. What did different cultures see as "just"? Was it merely a just cause, or did they consider just means, just ends, and other factors? Did they have suggestions of a just war, but then decide, nope, there's no justice in it at all? If their "just" war failed, did they reconsider? Did their concepts change?
I don't mean "just war" in the Christian context alone, or modern times. In fact, I can probably find a good number of sources on that if I looked, and I'm not interested in them at the moment.
Further, does anyone know anything about the historiography of just war -- have concepts or approached changed in interesting ways?
1 Answers 2017-11-03
Does anyone know the name / rank of the senior (or any) officer(s) in this image? Thank you in advance.
1 Answers 2017-11-03
1 Answers 2017-11-03
More specifically, The K class subs
1 Answers 2017-11-03
2 Answers 2017-11-03
4 Answers 2017-11-03
In the aftermath of WWII, Germany and Japan both were subjected to harsh treaties that involved dividing the land into occupational zones in Germany/Austria's case, and a division of Japan's Empire between the Soviets taking Manchuria and North Korea and the US taking South Korea and establishing a military occupation of the home islands.
But when Italy's peace treaty was signed in 1947, the terms are comparatively lenient, which included relinquishing all colonies in Africa, ceding small amounts of territory to Yugoslavia and Greece, war reparations that could be paid off in trade goods and services, and a limiting of the size of its military, which was suspended just a few years later with Italy's entry into NATO.
What prevented the Allies from establishing a military occupation of the country in the same fashion as Germany and Japan? Did the Allies just not have Italy's position in the Mediterranean in their strategic interests? Or was the light treatment deliberate to gain Italy as a willing Western ally as tensions with the USSR rose?
1 Answers 2017-11-03
I suppose what got me thinking about this was reading about the campaigns in the Solomons, where islanders helped coastwatchers do things such as hide from Japanese patrols, but there wasn't a lot of detail in what I was reading about their "regular lives" during the war. Are there English-languge sources on this?
2 Answers 2017-11-03
I have been trying to research this, but I can't find anything on it besides the fact that they, England and Scotland, were two seperate kingdoms. If they were two seperate kingdoms, then how come, according to The Wars of Independence, King Edward of England had the ability to judge who should become King of Scotland?
2 Answers 2017-11-03