1 Answers 2017-08-01
I am aware of the technical achievements of the design, but I am wondering about the application.
2 Answers 2017-08-01
1 Answers 2017-08-01
1 Answers 2017-08-01
Why mushrooms? Why fried tomatoes (a preparation I've never quite seen outside the confines of this meal)? Why those canned beans? Why that hockey puck of hash browns? It's a pretty tasty meal but its makeup seems to be, simultaneously, so unwaveringly rigid and so random. I figure there has to be a reason why.
1 Answers 2017-08-01
1 Answers 2017-08-01
1 Answers 2017-08-01
[deleted]
1 Answers 2017-08-01
Also, to be clear, he was in no way minimizing the horrors of slavery, which he rightly depicted in all their vivid and ugly colors.
1 Answers 2017-08-01
As objectively as possible, how slick was the Nixon campaign/administration in trying to pull off the Watergate burglary and subsequent cover-up?
1 Answers 2017-08-01
I was looking into this out of curiosity and found very little about it, something about a ruined castle in Switzerland.
Was that really the source of the Von Habsburg name and what happened to it?
1 Answers 2017-08-01
I've heard a lot of conflicting statements on this, from "not that sharp" to "sharp enough to shave", some of it even coming from folks with a fair amount of influence in the HEMA (Historical European Martial Arts) community. My question is specifically about longswords from the 14th to 16th century.
I've heard that a Norse test of sharpness was to immerse the blade in a flowing stream then float a hair to it and if the hair was cut the blade was sufficiently sharp, but this seems impractical for a battlefield weapon expected to be bashed against armor and other weapons.
1 Answers 2017-08-01
I recently read "When Adam Delved and Eve Span a history of the Peasants' Revolt of 1381" by Mark O'Brien, which seems to portray much of John Ball's preaching at this time and elements within the revolt itself as being proto-communist in their ideals, what is the consensus of academic historians on this?
1 Answers 2017-08-01
A short introduction: I'm /u/PangeranDipanagara, this subreddit's most active Southeast Asia expert. I am not a professional historian, but I have had a deep interest in the history of Indonesian societies for some time. This is my first AMA, hope I don't mess it up and it turns out to be at least somewhat interesting.
Note: Due to living on the other side of the earth as most of you folks, I will probably be asleep from around 11 AM EST to 7 PM EST. Feel free to ask as many questions as you want and I'll get to them in the morning (evening EST).
E: Going to bed now. See you tomorrow!
E: I'm back!
The peninsula of South Sulawesi is an oft-neglected corner of eastern Indonesia. After all, it is significantly smaller than West Virginia, its GDP is around that of Rhode Island, and it harbors no tourist magnets like neighboring Java or Bali. The only modicum of attention the area ever receives on this site is for having a gender system that seems peculiar to Western eyes, and to which Redditors show an astonishing lack of respect.
Yet the peninsula has one of the most diverse histories in Indonesia. South Sulawesi's history is first and foremost a narrative of change. It was a time and place when simple rice-farming chiefdoms became, within just three hundred years, "sophisticated, literate polities with a working knowledge of ballistics and the Galilean telescope." But on the darker side, it was also a time and place when the little peninsula exported as many slaves as the largest West African slave ports.
South Sulawesi's history is also a tale of old customs standing their ground in the face of unremitting change. In this deeply Muslim land, "third gender" shamans blessed pilgrims to Mecca, the nobility regularly elected women as rulers, and the I La Galigo--a pre-Islamic epic that is one of the longest works of literature in the world, far longer than even the Mahabharata--was recited. And despite all that had changed between 1300 and 1800, people in the peninsula held by the values that glued their society together: siriq (self-worth) and pesse (sympathy).
And South Sulawesi's history is finally a story of resistance and perseverance--a story of a great king asking the Dutch if they were "of the opinion that God has reserved these islands, so removed from your nation, for your trade alone," a story of exiles founding kingdoms two thousand miles away and of sailors toiling the long routes to Australia.
This AMA is about that history.
To help with any readers introduced to Sulawesi or Indonesian history for the first time, a very brief (>3000 character) synopsis of this AMA's topic. Gross generalizations will be unavoidable.
Most of the kingdoms that mark South Sulawesi's Early Modern history emerged as agricultural chiefdoms focused on intensive rice-farming around 1300, though newer research is pushing up the dates into the 13th century. Many of these polities were probably loose confederations of villages; others had hereditary chiefs with claims to divine descent but with limited power. There was no writing and no bureaucracy to speak of.
From the 15th century onward and increasingly in the 16th century, agricultural intensification and the growth of foreign commerce propelled the stratification and territorial expansion of chiefdoms. Writing was adopted around this time as well. By the mid-1500s most of the peninsula had been united by the kingdom of Gowa with its fertile rice fields, great foreign trade, and incipient bureaucracy.
Gowa completed its unification of South Sulawesi in the first decade of the 1600s with its formal adoption of Islam and its conquest of its neighbors under the justification of spreading the new faith. Supported by immense volumes of trade--its capital and main port was home to more than 100,000 people--Gowa then embarked on a rapid campaign of overseas expansion and created the largest maritime empire in eastern Indonesian history. Yet Gowa's hegemony was short-lived; in the Makassar War of 1666-1669, the Dutch East India Company allied with South Sulawesi rebels to shatter Gowa's power.
The leader of said rebels, Arung Palakka, indirectly ruled the entire peninsula as a most faithful ally of the Dutchmen until his death in 1696. His successor proved unable to carry on his legacy, and South Sulawesi's 18th-century history is marked by great wars as no kingdom proved able to gain dominance over the peninsula. Not even the Dutch--who maintained a few forts here and there following the Makassar War--could maintain control, and indeed the VOC (Dutch East India Company) steadily lost authority in the 18th century.
But the century was not all doom and gloom. Literacy seems to have expanded, although almost no research has been done on this. South Sulawesi traders and warriors took to the seas in unprecedented numbers, supported by indigenous Indonesia's most sophisticated credit system. Some people went southeast and made regular contact with Australia; others went northwest and founded a long-lasting Sulawesi-derived dynasty in the heart of the Malay world.
In the year 1800, despite the wars and the slave trade, South Sulawesi remained a vibrant center of indigenous civilization. Indeed, it would remain so for a century after 1800 until 1906, when the Dutch colonial government extinguished the last independent kingdoms on the peninsula. But that is beyond the scope of our AMA.
24 Answers 2017-08-01
1 Answers 2017-08-01
[deleted]
1 Answers 2017-08-01
--Were they assigned to only manual labor or did they have other jobs?
--did they have any recreational activities?
--how many recorded occurrences are there of Jews escaping?
--what was life like after they were released?
Thanks to everyone who answers!
1 Answers 2017-08-01
I learned the other day that slave trading was much of the basis of the Khanate's power. Where did its victims come from? Were they kept in Crimea or sent elsewhere? How long did the trade last and what put a stop to it?
1 Answers 2017-08-01
1 Answers 2017-08-01
Modern professional fighters look (and probably are) exhausted after 15 or 20 minutes of fighting. If I punch a bag for 10 minutes my arms will fall off.
I'm sure most soldiers had unbelievable stamina from training every day of their lives, but even so most of them were not that well fed, they had no modern medicine to help with infections and old or new injuries and a lot of them would have been wearing armour and padded jackets, not to mention having to wield really heavy weapons. Fighting for hours and hours with metal weapons you have to thrust and lift and throw, while wearing warm and heavy clothing sounds super-human to me, so how were they able to manage that?
Also I'm wondering whether an ancient or medieval battle really meant non-stop, hand-to-hand fighting for all soldiers at the same time.
1 Answers 2017-08-01