I have noticed a large amount of information floating around about how Mother Teresa mistreated her patients. is this actually true?

It seemed to be an exaggeration in context, but he did support his claim, as the deaths of many Christians in churches on a Sunday made people reject spiritual explanations for the event and start seeking naturalistic ones.

By "adventurers," I essentially mean "freelancers who accept dangerous contracts such as driving off bandits/wildlife, pursuing criminals, retrieving lost or stolen goods, escort travelers/explorers, etc." Essentially small-scale mercenaries. In some versions of the trope, adventurers are organized into guilds, which will connect adventurers with clients (presumably for a share of the reward). Sometimes, these guilds also encourage high-quality adventurers through ranking, training, regulations, etc.

Did anything like this exist in your period of expertise?

How was the treatment of Jesse Owens and black athletes in general during the 1936 Berlin Olympics?

I went on a historic house tour and was interested by a comment that the financier Robert Morris held near total power over certain aspects of American government during the revolution. I got the impression the tour guide was trying to hype things up a bit, but I really don’t know much about how decisions were made during the revolution so I suppose he could have had a lot of say.

Are there any books or resources that would help me understand the us government at this time?

For instance, czech used to have a dual number which is completely gone by now. English has a widely reduced inflection and conjugation compared to even early modern English, with only pronouns and a few verbs to show.

Admittedly this question would probably be more suited for a linguistics subreddit, but I'm still curious as to how complex the grammar of languages like proto-indo-European was

How did New Mexico contribute to the outcome of WW2? Specifically, how influential were the code talkers and The Manhattan Project?

Engels' devotion to Marx seems extreme, even for a close friend. Engels not only financially supported Marx throughout much of his life, but also went to a lot of trouble to edit and publish Marx's works after his death with no recompense. There is some evidence from Marx's letters that Engels even went so far as to claim an illegitimate child of Marx's was his own child to spare Marx any negative public perception and financial burden.

While it is certainly possible that Engels simply felt extreme friendship and closeness with Marx and it went no further than that, there is no evidence that Engels did this sort of thing -- certainly not to this extreme -- with his other friends and comrades in the communist movement.

Is there any evidence in the historical record, or in Engels and Marx's letters or the like, that Marx and Engels had a romantic or sexual relationship at any time, or at least that Engels had unrequited romantic feelings for Marx?

From what little I know of, the other kingdoms of their time seemed just as vicious as they were, but how did they become marked in history as particularly evil? Were they even a little more cruel than the others, or when and how in history did they gain this fame?

I know Vladímir Putin was part of the KGB and he served in Dresden Germany as a KGB agent. The KGB kind of organized a coup against the government of the USSR.

I read somewhere he was in charge of moving a lot of money (and he got rich by doing so)

This doesn’t break the 20 year rule because I’m asking something related to the collapse of the Soviet Union.

I realize the length of time between events was significant - were there any individuals involved in the Jacobite rebellion (on the Jacobite side) that were involved in the American revolution (on either side, but more so the colonial side)?

Did they labor all day to survive? Did they have free time? I don't know so i figured ill ask the historians

It seems that for a long time if you were persecuted in your country for political reasons, then Mexico was the place to go

I would like to understand what combination of factors led to this situation

Interested in hearing more about fur trappers and hunters in medieval Europe up to 1600s. I haven’t been able to find much online about it.

We’re there fur trappers in medieval England and France like there was in North America in the 1600-1800s?

I’ve seen that there were trappers in Russia and Siberia. And that Europeans would trade for furs. But what about folks actually making a living as fur trappers during this time?

Did they actually use traps or more bows and muskets? Was the primary quarry sable, hares, and harts? Or were there others?

We’re the primary buyers tailors or royalty?

Did these languages have no indigenous script of their own?

Is the general answer a simple "we don't know", or "we have no idea", or is there any reason to believe specific places, like a hypothetical specific unexcavated archaeological site might have one but we don't have the means to excavate them yet? (perhaps because some city was built on top of an older library that may contain important writings, and so we can't excavate, etc...)