In this thread a redditor mentioned that Romans passed laws sober on the first day, and then got drunk and passed them again the second day. The idea was that being drunk would help bait out bad ideas / get the truth out of people who might be holding back on objections.
Is this true?
If so:
Do we know when the tradition started or ended?
Was it successful?
Have any other societies used alcohol in a similar manner?
Link to comment: http://www.reddit.com/r/depression/comments/39apyh/i_went_to_a_party_last_night/cs2ffq4
2 Answers 2015-06-11
1 Answers 2015-06-11
As a bonus, what was SS training like as compared to the US elite forces, such as the Airborne and the Marines?
1 Answers 2015-06-11
According to Wikipedia, the initial cause was thought to be human error, but a 1991/1992 report suggests widespread systemic failures. Is the 1991/1992 document the definitive document on the causes of the disaster or have there been further revisions?
1 Answers 2015-06-11
My dad is going to Alsace in a few weeks, and will be spending some time in Germany. He mentioned offhand that he'd like to learn more about German history so I want to get him some sort of book on German history. In particular I'm looking for something readable (as opposed to scholarly) and about German history pre World Wars. It can be about any subject but in particular I think he'd like to read something on either the medieval HRE or Prussian Germany.
Edit: I think I got what I was looking for, thanks for the suggestions!
2 Answers 2015-06-11
I was curious whether nobles/royalty ever went for runs? I like a good run myself but I'd be remissed if I was acting like a peasant.
2 Answers 2015-06-11
Why, instead of saying, the Winsdor family, or the Hasburg family, we say House Windsor, and House of Hasburg?
1 Answers 2015-06-10
The Jie were a nomadic tribe that briefly had much power in Northern China due to Shi Le, who became the most powerful general, then ruler, in N. China during the Early 4th century CE. Yet the Jie language is only known from two brief sentences given to Shi Le by his advisor, the Buddhist missionary Fotudeng. Why would Fotudeng, a Kuchan, know any Jie? and did this indicate a failed effort by Shi Le to Jie-ize the state, akin to Manchu efforts during the Qing to make China bilingual?
1 Answers 2015-06-10
1 Answers 2015-06-10
They seem to speak pretty definitively about stuff like civilizations that existed long before the Sumerains.
1 Answers 2015-06-10
1 Answers 2015-06-10
I was reading an article discussing the Biblical passage of Matthew 19:11-12:
Jesus replied, “Not everyone can accept this word, but only those to whom it has been given. For there are eunuchs who were born that way, and there are eunuchs who have been made eunuchs by others—and there are those who choose to live like eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. The one who can accept this should accept it.”
and the argument of the article uses this passage as evidence of non-binary gender identities in Ancient Israel, particularly for eunuchs. I'm fascinated by that argument and am wondering if there are any extra-Biblical sources that shed light on supporting or challenging that argument.
I did some digging around in a lot of existings posts, almost all involving /u/caffarelli and haven't seen anything on Israel specifically, just one on Byzantine that seems to be from a later time period.
2 Answers 2015-06-10
Rome was in a constant state of war during it's existence, did the Romans usually wait for a justified reason to declare war or did they feel no need to do so?
edit: For clarity
1 Answers 2015-06-10
EDIT: TY /u/Kegaha Mankind, bad choice of word. To be more precise, the change from the Egyptian/Roman/Greek/Northern Gods to Christianity, Islam and Judaism.
1 Answers 2015-06-10
4 Answers 2015-06-10
Examples:
Abram and Sarai --> Abraham and Sarah
Jacob --> Israel
Simon --> Peter
Saul --> Paul
I realize that each of the names mean something (Petros = rock, and Jesus said he would "build" his Church on him). But, is there more to it than that? Something more along the lines of new identities or the fact that the new names came from God/Jesus himself?
Thanks!
1 Answers 2015-06-10
We hear all the time about Germany's military actions in Europe, North Africa, and the Soviet Union, but I'm not sure I've ever heard anything about the Nazis in the Pacific.
1 Answers 2015-06-10
I was reading about William of Orange on this subreddit today and ended up going down the wikipedia rabbit hole.
I ended up reading about the War of the Pyrenees. The listed reasons for the war are vague and seemingly lacking: "France executed King Louis XVI by guillotine, enraging other monarchs of Europe."
That would be an acceptable reason for Spain to declare war on France, but it doesn't explain why France would suddenly declare war on Spain, who according to wikipedia was France's "ancient ally."
Was France and Spain's alliance really considered ancient? Who was considered their common "enemy"?
Why, when already at war with Habsburg Austria, Prussia, Sardinia-Piedmont and with a pending diplomatic break with Great Britain, did France declare war against Spain?
1 Answers 2015-06-10
1 Answers 2015-06-10
1 Answers 2015-06-10
Edit. I'm putting this edit at the top because it's bothering me so much, but did should really be do (in the title.) Hopefully if we did know that stuff we still do...
I'm interested in this idea in general, especially if there is a different answer for depending on when you joined either war.
I have been really really really into world war one ever since listening to dan carlin's hardcore history. Blue print for armegedden. I highly recommend it. Dan Carlin really describes the combat in world War one as brutal, blood bathish, and almost like a death sentence. And his descriptions of the combat involve the word meat grinder. So when he paints these awful images of people running across a field just to be mowed down by a machine gun.
So what rate of survival makes world war one a meat grinder? I mean, when you describe these charges as suicide missions and then tell me 1 million people on one side of the war died in a single offensive. How many people were actually invovled?
We're the first people over the top of the trenches in these offensives just doomed to die? Did they know that? I imagine the survivability of each wave of soldiers went up as time went on because maybe the previous waves make some headway.
I'm talking a lot about world war one but I'm equally interested in world War two statistics.
There's a lot of questions here. But really just anything we know about this would be a really great insight on the wars I think.
I'd be stunned if I learned like 90% of people who joined the French army in 1914 were dead by the end of the war. But I'd equally be surprised if it was like 15%.
1 Answers 2015-06-10