So I was reading the Wikipedia article about the Battle of Vimy Ridge, and there is mention of the fall of the town of Thelus. What was capturing a town like in the time of WWI? Was there even a battle for the town or did the defenders just withdraw? Was it a house to house combat situation?
Also, could anyone point me in the direction of some WWI literature? I'm looking to understand the actual war itself a littler better.
3 Answers 2014-05-03
I've heard this old adage that ww2 was won with russian blood, american steel and british 'intelligence' (ie:spycraft)...
I understand that is a pithy but ultimately ridiculous statement, but I was curious about how the idea of intelligence services became formalised and how that whole part of society and culture evolved in the 19th or early 20th century (or maybe before!). Obviously 'sneaky' behaviour has existed since time immemorial but I was more interested in when a country first formalised such a practice.
I hope this question follows subreddit guidelines
3 Answers 2014-05-03
Pretty self-explanatory, but I was wondering why long hair in the West is a girl thing.
1 Answers 2014-05-03
Maybe this question is inappropriate for such a high brow group of Redditors, but I am serious. I used to love Caesar 3 for the PC and it got me interested in Roman History. I am skeptical as to how realistic it was, though.
1 Answers 2014-05-03
I watch a lot of stuff about the Battle of Stalingrad, Bombing of Dresden, Leningrad, Battle of Britain, etc. Does anyone have a book or documentary recommendation about how the people and governments rebuilt all of these places? What do you do with a city of rubble? Or if this is your area I would love to know how they did it. Especially, what was it like for the people doing this work and living through that process? Thank you!
1 Answers 2014-05-03
I'm interested for guessable personal reasons. But also, were people with certain names (Henry, John, Richard etc) just more likely to be king? Matthew has been a common name for a long time, but perhaps it hasn't been a aristocratic name.
2 Answers 2014-05-02
1 Answers 2014-05-02
I was recently informed that kilts only came into wide spread use in and around the end of the 16th century. How did clans identfy each other before kilts? Were their just flags? Or was it just like everyone knew everyone?
1 Answers 2014-05-02
1 Answers 2014-05-02
1 Answers 2014-05-02
So in the early 1970s and 1980s and even all the way through out to the 1990s there was a huge moral panic over tabletop roleplaying games. That RPGs were blamed for making teens kill themselves. What was it like back in that era when Dungeons and Dragons and other Tabletop RPG games were the target? What did you think of it? And is it the same thing happening now with Online Game Addiction?
1 Answers 2014-05-02
In this CNN article, a pro-Russian militant is quoted as saying:
[T]here's no such nationality as Ukrainian. That's an Austria-Hungarian deception. We're Russian. We're all Russian. And this land isn't Ukraine: it's Novorossiya - and we will defend it.
What exactly is he referring to? Or, to be more precise, what did the Austro-Hungarian Empire have to do with the formation of Ukraine or the Ukrainian identity?
If this has been covered already, I apologize and will delete it. I thought it was a novel and interesting enough question to deserve its own thread.
1 Answers 2014-05-02
Hey guys, so I was wondering.. Charlemagne got to be the Emperor because he was crowned by the Pope. The same with the Emperors from the Habsburg-Dynasty. But, for example Prussia got to be a kingdom because the Emperor said so, and the Pope didn't approve that. Napoleon just crowned himself to the Emperor of France and Russia was also viewed as an Empire but since it was Orthodox it will not be the Pope who crowned him. On the other hand, the UK owned 1/4 of the world and always stayed a kingdom, not an Empire. And when Germany was proclaimed, it was a big dispute whether Wilhelm I. could call himself an Emperor or not. How was it decided back then what was a kingom, what was an Empire or a Duchy? Could you just go around "Hey this guys looks mighty, I guess he could make me a king"?
1 Answers 2014-05-02
Many of the ancient rulers of Egypt appeared to have claimed divine status to the extent of being considered living gods, or at least of holy blood.
When Akhenaten tried to convert the kingdom to sole worship of the sun disk Aten, how was the matter of the Pharaoh's divinity handled?
1 Answers 2014-05-02
http://www.cracked.com/article_21091_5-bullshit-facts-everyone-believes-about-wwii.html
This article talks about five things that most people believe about world war II. I would like to know about the legitimacy of their claims. This article was put on their website today.
The first point is that World War II was not as technologically advanced as many people think. That many countries were using cavalry, including the US, Russia, and Germany. I think this point is more focused on the use of horses than the lack of technology, because even if the number of horses used matches with the article, I think the technology used was impressive for the time.
The next point talks about how the Nazis were never close to developing an atomic bomb, mostly because of their anti-semitism forcing Albert Einstein and Erwin Schroedinger out of the country. Another point was that because of the war, very few other countries wanted to work with Germany on their technological research.
The third point talks about how before the Nazis took over, Germany was on the up-and-up on the state of their government. The article says that after the Nazis took over, the German government became a bumbling mess. The Gestapo also would have lost all legitimacy if not for stories that random citizens had made up about the Gestapo's power.
The fourth point talks about how the generation of people during WWII actually weren't the "greatest generation" for a myriad of reasons. The fact that two-thirds of WWII servicemen were drafted, vs. two-thirds of Vietnam war servicemen being volunteers. The fact that WWII had the highest draft-dodging rates in US history, desertion rates were the same as in Vietnam, and that the servicemen were getting drunk whenever they could.
Lastly, the article claims that not many people in the US even knew what the war was about, and that many who did know wanted every single Japanese person exterminated from the planet.
That is it on the article. Also, should we start a subreddit about fact-checking Cracked articles? I have seen several posts wanting to fact-check articles, and maybe these should be delegated to their own subreddit.
4 Answers 2014-05-02
I'm reading Dividing the Spoils currently and throughout the search for a single successor Arridhaeus is constantly referred to as simple. Without giving too much away (I haven't gotten far in the book and honestly have no clue what happens to anyone although if I had to hazard a guess I'd say he's probably going to end up being killed) do historians today have any idea if he really was just dumb, or mentally retarded, or maybe even autistic?
1 Answers 2014-05-02
I'm looking for a good history of the Franks, ranging at very least from the reign of Clovis (preferably before) to the reign of Charlemagne (preferably after).
2 Answers 2014-05-02
1 Answers 2014-05-02
I saw this article and noticed it seems to be mostly science-based rather than history-based. Is there a historical basis for the "wetting the sand" theory? Does their interpretation of that picture make sense?
1 Answers 2014-05-02
I have found some information about the alphabet houses in Richland being assigned based on workgroup and specialty but I haven't been able to find much on how this was determined.
Did they keep department heads together? Were high ranking security personnel placed next to nuclear scientists in charge of research?
I have heard stories and the like about it but have never been able to find concrete research to back it up.
Thanks!
1 Answers 2014-05-02
Per http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicken#South_America
Can someone parse this section for me? Particularly the first sentence of the last paragraph of the section (the quoted bit). I don't know what "clustering" is exactly, and the clauses of the first sentence sound contradictory to me if I can try to understand them at all.
Why did they decide the chickens weren't pre-Columbian and/or weren't domesticated gallus gallus?
1 Answers 2014-05-02