If you somehow braced it to your forearm, it could produce incredible striking power, both slashing and stabbing. Does it have something to do with the dexterity provided by the hand’s rotating sockets?

I read a while ago that Jesus is a Roman transliteration of Yeshua. All of my life I figured Jesus would have been called Jesus by his contemporaries but alas he would not have. This really got me thinking why would we translate a name?

From how I see it, his name wasn’t Jesus. They are totally different sounds. What is a name historically speaking? Does Jesus mean the same thing in Latin that Yeshua means in Hebrew? What would this be in English, and we don’t we translate it further?

I am by no means Christian. I heard my 6th grade social studies teacher say this and I wonder about the accuracy about this. I have nothing against her, I just want some confirmation.

Thomas Ricks’ book “The Generals” touches on a theme that I’ve long heard, which is that Marshall showed exceptional judgment in plucking Eisenhower from near total obscurity and thrusting him into command in Europe, over far more senior and combat-experienced generals. But, it doesn’t say anything about how Marshall came to hear of him in the first place. What had Eisenhower done that was so exceptional?

With the popular image of the Reign of Terror being guillotines beheading people by the dozens in Paris, I was curious what effect the movement would have on people who are further away from the metro centers of revolutionary France

Would I have to be careful of who I was associating with? Would it be harder for me to get goods? Or is my life relatively unbothered by this, with the dust having settled somewhat after the passage of the new constituion?

I was reading some of the debate surrounding originalism that's come up for no specific reason, and it was noted by someone on Twitter that when the constitution was ratified, abortion was legal. I was curious if this is correct. I'm relatively familiar with the refocusing of abortion since the 60s and 70s as compared to the early 19th century, but was unsure about the legality going further back.

All I've been able to find on Norse/Scandinavian fortifications online is about Viking Ring Fortresses. Certainly a cool piece of architecture, but not what I'm looking for. What form did the fortifications during the Medieval Age look like? Did they take after fortifications of their more southern counterparts, or was there qualities about them unique to the area due to environment, technological differences, etc?

Was it because they resented city life or was it for another reason?

That is, did anyone ever forgo swords and pistols and propose a fist fight? Would that be uncivilized or unfair?

I’ve heard about Lincoln choosing the swords because his reach advantage, but if I was going against a great marksman/swordsman it would make sense to want a stand up fist fight to minimize risk.

In school, I was only taught why the Patriots decided to split away from the British Empire. However, I was never told why the Loyalists decided to stay. What benefits were Loyalists seeing with staying with the crown? How did they view events like the Boston Tea Party and the Stamp Act? and how did they view Patriots?

Hi Historians!

People often discuss Alchemy in Europe but I'm much more interested in the Alchemy of the Middle East. Who were the biggest names? What are the most important manuscripts? Are there any high quality (academic quality) books on the subject?

​

Thank you!

After the telescope was invented, I assume people understood that other planets were solid like balls similar to earth, but what did they make of the sun?

I'm currently reading a chapter about Belgian migration in the 19th century and it was noted that both of them stayed in Belgium. I know that Marx wrote to Abraham Lincoln and that Hugo praised John Brown after his execution.

Both Marx and Hugo were massive intellectual figures and lived in the same time period but did they ever voiced their opinion about the other or did they even wrote letters between them?

Recently, with Gal Gadot being chosen to be Cleopatra in a new movie, the controversy about her race has been unearthed. Cleopatra has a proved Macedonian Greek heritage by her father's side, and it seems to be that the great mistery about it is the origin of her mother.

I wouldn't mind the actress chosen to be white, black or of multiracial roots , as fiction has its poetic licenses, neither do I think that black and white are valid labels for the Ancient World.

But I can't stand for falsification of history, and would like to know your opinion as historians and history enthusiasts: what would be Cleopatra's racial background today? And does it matter?