You can actually see Hitler at the funeral procession for the Jewish socialist Eisner here.
From what I understand Hitler had in no way fully fleshed out his ideology by 1918 so any revolutionary front would do. But at the same time he was definitely still anti-semitic according to Kershaw. So why join a Red Brigade if it's under a Jew? That seems crazy to me.
I did find a TIK video that talked about this subject but TIK is a well known crazy person so I wouldn't trust his opinion on this at all.
What the hell is going on during this period of Hitler's life that he'd join these guys?
1 Answers 2022-09-10
I am looking for articles and/or books that describe decisions the United States made during the Cold War, especially ones that go into the reasoning for US action and/or one's that utilize a structural realist framework.
Another related thing that I am looking for is sources that counter or discuss the commonly-held notion that the conflicts between the United States and the Communist states at the time were due to ideological disparities like the ones between Communism and Capitalism/American-Style Democracy.
Some examples of what I think would be particularly helpful, if you have sources that don't fit these that you think might help I'd be very happy to see them as well,
1 Answers 2022-09-10
The famous idea of betraying the Greek alliance by Ephialtes.
How much of that idea is accurate? What reason should Ephialtes be loyal to the southern Greeks anyway? The Persians said they wanted to attack Athens, not Malis. Lots of Greek states sided with Xerxes, including Macedonia. Was there any other reason why Ephialtes might have been supposed to be loyal to a people who could have been nearly as foreign to Northern Greece as Persia?
1 Answers 2022-09-10
1 Answers 2022-09-10
I've seen some maps that shows the hun empire controling modern day Denmark, and even parts of Sweden. I couldn't find any information on this, is there any evidence of that being the case?
1 Answers 2022-09-10
Experience without theory is blind, but theory without experience is mere intellectual play. ~Immanuel Kant
In my other post, I asked about alternatives to the works of Jared Diamond. This response struck me as interesting;
When historians and anthropologists criticise Diamond, it is by presenting the truth they have distilled from their data. The truth is that the world is much more complex than Diamond's monocausal model would have you believe. The data for every community and culture and time period is unique and has features that defy easy generalisation. If you want truth, you have to take that into account. But that means it is the facts themselves that make it impossible to say categorically that "x factors are causally tied to y outcomes". Data about the human past will inevitably lead you to the conclusion that no single factor is casually tied to the same outcome every time, everywhere, regardless of other factors. If you want truth, you cannot have laws of history. You can only have one of these, never both.
This is why the response of historians to people saying "history shows this" is typically negative. The cliché of the historian is someone saying "it's actually a lot more complicated than that." People don't like this, because it's an attack on their sense that they've figured things out. But unfortunately, that is what it means to seek truth: you have to constantly revise your understanding based on the data that you find and the picture you can construct with it.
I'm all for revising theory in light of new evidence. But in order to do that, I need to have a theory to begin with. The reaction I've gotten has seemed to imply that it's somehow wrong or incorrect to form a theory.
Though the quote is replying to someone who said they were looking for causal relationships, I'm not. Correlations are fine for me. Though like many, I have a subconscious desire to find the capital t Truth that endures through the ages and is applicable to all situations, I know intellectually this is unattainable. But that doesn't mean I can't look for lowercase t truths that apply in most situations. Furthermore, I'm open to the idea of contradictory models and theories not being mutually exclusive. If we can't at least do that, we seemingly can't learn from history. Where does that leave us?
So if I can't have laws of history, can I have principles? Common patterns? As stated here, I'm especially interested in the dynamics of how societies grow, change, and remain stable. What should I read to find these patterns?
2 Answers 2022-09-10
What made the Dutch government (want to) accept Wilhelm II following the exile he was forced into after the end of WWI? I know the Netherlands was neutral during the war, but did their monarchy have some sort of closer relation to Germany's in that era? I know that Wilhelm II was first cousins with Czar Nicholas II and George V, but was there a strong Dutch connection there as well, or was it something from Wilhelm's father's side?
1 Answers 2022-09-10
What is the oldest type of protection used in sexual activities by humans? What did different civilizations use as protections until modern condoms were invented?
1 Answers 2022-09-10
Its the only letter that doesn't follow the naming conventions of the rest if the alphabet, i.e. it has 3 syllables as opposed to all other letters' 1, and it doesn't have a sound it makes in its name. Additionally, I've heard that "q" is the newest letter in the alphabet, yet "w" uses the presumably more contemporary word "double"
1 Answers 2022-09-10
This is in relation to the Potato Famine question and some of the links posted earlier. It sounds like Sen argues that “no famine has occurred in a democracy with a free press.” https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/2zqz3z/comment/cplvaxl/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share&context=3
So my question is…for both the Potato Famine and the Bengal Famine, the ruling government is controlled by the British Empire. The British Empire is a parliamentary democracy. If the British Empire Democracy gave rise to the Potato Famine and Bengal Famine, how is Sen considered accurate? What am I missing?
3 Answers 2022-09-10
I heard "Down in the River to Pray" for the first time in the movie "Oh brother were art thou" and I really liked it, but ever since I've find it really odd
The song is indeed very mystical, in terms of music and lyrics, but it doesn't sound very christian
the singer invites "brothers, sisters, mothers, fathers and sinners" to go "down in the river to pray", they talk about studying "the good old way" and it constantly ask two questions: "who will wear the starry crown" and "who will wear robe and crown"
Many of those symbols can be seen from a christian perspective. The river represents baptism, perhaps full body baptism and "the good old way" could be the ten commandments, but what are the robe and crowns?
The song seems to be describing a ritual were two people, a man and a woman, will be chosen to perform some kind of ceremony, while wearing ritual clothes, and standing on a river. That ritual is not christian in the slightest
This makes me suspect that maybe the song has its origins in african religions, since this song seems to have its origin in the african american communities. Is it possible that african religions had a ritual that resembled something like this? Perhaps the Serer religion of Senegal has or had a ritual like this?
2 Answers 2022-09-10
I was recently looking for information about ancient egypt in the Old, Middle, and New Kingdom periods.
And the information tended to come in two flavors:
Historians talking about the monumental architecture, and funerary practices.
Pseudoscientists talking about "advanced ancient technology".
I'd like to learn more about Pharaonic Egypt than just how people died, and what happened after, but that seems to be the only thing anyone ever talks about.
Where can I find information on what life was like in these societies?
And is there a good process for finding reliable, vetted information about historical societies and cultures in general (outside of research papers)?
1 Answers 2022-09-10
I do not know the scope of white fears around slave revolts, but I believe there was a substantial amount of fear to drive some areas of policy-making in the antebellum South. However, slave revolts could never be well enough armed, well enough coordinated, and with well enough numbers to make any slave revolt in the US successful. Where did the fear come from?
1 Answers 2022-09-10
King Charles had his Proclamation Speech today and it included a long oath about The Church of Scotland. Can someone provide some context as to what that's all about?
1 Answers 2022-09-10
It seems like every town and smaller fief had its own currency. For instance, in the Wikipedia entry for the Old Swiss Confederacy it says:
About 75 different local currencies, including Basel thaler, Berne thaler, Fribourg gulden, Geneva thaler, Geneva genevoise, Luzern gulden, Neuchâtel gulden, St. Gallen thaler, Schwyz gulden, Solothurn thaler, Valais thaler, Zürich thaler
Seventy-five (75!) different local currencies for just such a small region! There must have been like a thousand different currencies across the entire empire!
Questions:
1 Answers 2022-09-10
Today:
AskHistorians is filled with questions seeking an answer. Saturday Spotlight is for answers seeking a question! It’s a place to post your original and in-depth investigation of a focused historical topic.
Posts here will be held to the same high standard as regular answers, and should mention sources or recommended reading. If you’d like to share shorter findings or discuss work in progress, Thursday Reading & Research or Friday Free-for-All are great places to do that.
So if you’re tired of waiting for someone to ask about how imperialism led to “Surfin’ Safari;” if you’ve given up hope of getting to share your complete history of the Bichon Frise in art and drama; this is your chance to shine!
1 Answers 2022-09-10
I always assumed that it was for camouflage, as it fit with their role as skirmishers: operating more independently than rigid line formations, thus not needing bright coloured uniforms for visibility in the smoke-haze of battle, and allowing them to be concealed as they individually picked out their targets.
However, this re-enactor contends that it wasn't really for camouflage, but rather "because king George likes green".
Now, I know random youtube videos aren't a scholarly source, but to be fair neither is the texts and media that I built my initial assumption from. And it sort of makes sense, as the dress of battalions was more often than not determined by the proclivities of the nobleman raising them, and just how useful would dark green even be as camouflage in the lightly coloured dry scrub of Iberia anyway?
So, which one was it? Camouflage or pageantry (or both!)?
1 Answers 2022-09-10
During Japan's small invasions off China over time, why did they establish multiple Chinese puppets, more specifically, Mengjiang and Manchuko. (I know they established the reorganized one too) but why have 3 puppet states? Why not just one or maybe 2? And what was the purpose of Mengjiang which seemed like the most useless. My apologies if I got anything wrong; my knowledge of this period is bad.
1 Answers 2022-09-10
1 Answers 2022-09-10
I'm trying to dye linen without synthetic or New World ingredients but so far it seems impossible. I've read that black clothing was used in Greece at least since the 6th century BC and Romans wore it as a symbol or mourning. How did they do it? Or was "black" used for shades that we wouldn't classify as black today?
Thank you so much.
1 Answers 2022-09-10
In the historical novel Shogun, the main character Blackthorne, a daring explorer finds himself in feudal japan, there is a moment where he is offered a boy to sleep with as a polite gesture.
In his anger against the offer, he delves into an internal monologue mentioning something that stood out to me.
“Most sailors have tried that way, for how else can they stay sane with many months at sea. Isnt it because you have been tempted and you’ve hated yourself for being tempted? ISNT because when you were young you had to fight to protect yourself, and once you were held down and almost raped, but you broke away and killed one of the bastards the knife snapped in his throat. You twelve.”
So I have two main questions, how common was sodomy between two consenting sailors in the age of sail? And if it was common, how was it looked upon?
Also, was the sexual assault of cabin boys common at this time, and again, how was the practice treated in the eyes of the naval community?
Clavell was know to perform heavy research when writing the Epic, so for him to randomly insert this out of no where seems unlikely. Hence my question.
1 Answers 2022-09-10
I recently heard a pre-Columbian transoceanic contact theory suggesting that African people sailed to South America and traded with Olmec peoples and other indigenous Americans. Is there any truth to this? Any hard evidence?
1 Answers 2022-09-10
I have not read Freud's Moses and Monotheism. I am only reading excerpts from it in a different book which does not explain clearly why.
1 Answers 2022-09-10
Particularly people in relatively landlocked areas, and I also don't necessarily mean like, "could swim a mile in the ocean comfortably", but I'm wondering more like if they were in a situation where they were in water deeper than their height (meaning: just not shallow enough to stand) and had to swim to safety, how likely would it be for a commoner to drown in such relatively safe/shallow conditions?
1 Answers 2022-09-10
I am aware of the criticisms of The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, but I really enjoyed the flow and breadth of the work and specifically the audiobook.
I'm going to listen to The Coming of the Third Reich soon, but I'd also like something about the Asia-Pacific aspect of the war that's respected, but still an engaging listen.
Does anyone have any recommendations?
1 Answers 2022-09-10