Did the people or government of ancient Rome ever consider measures to restrict migration into the Empire, or restricting granting citizenship to migrants?

I've been watching Vikings lately and I was Wondering if this was a problem in that age. When Ragnar returns from his first western voyage, he brings a lot of treassure with him. Did viking voyages bring this much treassure in general and if they did, how did the local communities deal with the inflation?

I imagine that it must have been before Pyrrhus of Epirus attacked because they’d been gobbling up lands way before than that. I remember reading a book by Anthony Everitt wherein he says that at some relatively early period the Greeks were jealous that the Romans could achieve through consensus and compromise in their own society what the Greeks themselves could barely do through internecine war and strife, and I seem to remember this being in either the late 4th or very early 3rd centuries BC. They had long thought of them as part of the Barbarian rabble, but some also noted that they governed with a constitution with complex laws and a series of checks on the power in their Republican government. So when did they go from a Western backwater to a group worthy of attention?

I have found that name of the movement is always listed as "Hutu Power" regarless or the language, in spanish and french for example the word Power is left untranslated, i dont know this was also the case in Rwanda, but it make me wonder if, like with "White Power", the name was an apropiation of the Black Power movement

From what I've learned/been taught about the Norse people is that vikings were culturally more than just people raiding places. So since I don't know much about the viking/norse culture I thought I'd come here with a few questions.

Exactly how united were the norse people during the viking age? Being that they were from different places separated by land and water, did they often share monarchs? Did they differ culturally/religiously/linguistically from region to region (eg. Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Iceland, Danelaw, Normandy, or more I don't know of)?

How did the norse people/culture come about (did they differ from other parts of Europe because of their location and if so did that help develop their culture/religion)? Were/are they considered to derive from germanic tribes and if so why was a place like Denmark not part of the HRE being that it bordered it?

I know they had raided places from North America to modern day Russia, but I can't seem to find online if they had invaded the HRE, and if so were they invested there as much as they were other places like invaded the British Isles and Ireland?

How far did their influence reach? I've read they made it as far as North America and even established trade with the Middle East, but did their influence reach any other far places as well?

I apologize for the many questions I imagine they can have very in depth answers but I'm a simple person so feel free to keep the answers simple, I'm new to the topic and reddit so I apologize if I come off as ignorant on the topic as well as redditing (I tried to stay within the rules of the subreddit).

If you take the time to answer I appreciate you reading through this as I know this is a lot with to many questions I'm just very interested in the topic.

Did they know of anything that existed in the Pacific? As far as I know, the Portuguese and the Dutch sailed around Africa so they arrived from the west. What was the cultural conception?

Presumably any Greeks who were killed would be given a proper burial since they were on Greek soil and they won the war. Since the Persians lost and were on Greek soil, would the bodies have been buried by the Persians wherever they could or were they left on the battlefield? Did the Greeks bury them for them?

I was curious to know how the bathrooms were like at the Nazi concentration camps during the World War 2. Was there even any bathrooms and were they given toilet paper? Also were women given any sanitary products?

Ps: i am not a native English speaker so sorry for my broken English

I'm aware that the Cajun peoples are defended from the Acadians who were expelled from modern day NB and Nova Scotia, however, I was wondering, these expelled people have left a lasting pression on the current population of Lousianna, but then what happened to the original settlers in New Orleans and the surrounding area? Why haven't (to my knowledge) the french settlers in the area had the same impact that the Cajuns did? Assuming that they were assimilated into broader American society, why didn't the Cajuns assimilate to a similar extent?

Was it frowned upon for ladies to smoke in public back in those days in England? Did they smoke in their own time? It seems from what media I've seen of this period, only the men seemed to smoke. And I can't find anything about aristocratic women in that era smoking from simple googling.

This is for a short story I'm writing. If someone could help me out, that would be great!

So I’m watching a YouTube video on a random battle in WWII, and they mention the number of tanks destroyed in a town, or right on the outskirts of a town. It got me thinking, if and when did these destroyed be recycled?

Obviously proximity was a factor because I’m assuming you would need an industrial smelter to melt down a tank tread or shell-riden paneling? If a large smelter is needed then did they actually actively collect parts, load them up in trucks and use valuable fuel transporting them to the smelter? And if they did collect parts, did the get the whole tank? -like the super heavy frame ? (I’m not sure what you would call these part, but you get the point) I’m just wondering if that would need cranes or plows-and if those were available during wartime.

I’ve seen clips on bunkers being striped down for parts, but I always though that was them removing and reinstalling somewhere else, not thinking they were re-melted. And a city would be a preferred spot to find a nice destroyed tank,easy for the picking, but what about in the ardennes forest? We’re there just destroyed tanks that stayed around until after the war ended?

this isn't asking why did hitler believe all that shit about jewish people, i'm wondering why he decided to start killing them off. in history class i vaguely remember being told that originally they were just segregated into small areas of germany and said areas would be walled off and they were forced to work. i remember he had them wear armbands, and that the nazi's would look for any excuse to be mean to them. so what caused his sudden shift in mind? how/why did he go from segregating them to straight up shipping them off to concentration camps and killing them?

I was listening to a history podcast talking about Andrew Jackson's life, and they said that the reason he got into so many duels was due to the fact that he was in a relationship with a woman, Rachel Donelson, who had tried to divorce her former husband, Lewis Robards, but later found out that the divorce wasn't valid, so lots of people at the time called Rachel a whore for being with Andrew Jackson while still (legally) married, and Andrew Jackson would then duel those people.

The podcasters joked that this was like targeting the symptoms of a disease rather than the root cause, and that Andrew Jackson clearly should have directly challenged Lewis Robards to a duel rather than all of the people reacting to Rachel's continued legal marriage to him. Although it was said partially in jest, I still feel like they made a really good point. Why didn't Andrew Jackson just duel Lewis Robards directly?