The movie generated a lot of interest in the Kennedy assassination when it came out in 1991. It's been criticized as being wildly inaccurate. What do historians think of the movie and what is inaccurate about it?
1 Answers 2019-11-29
Luther travelled on 23 January 1546 from Halle to Eisleben on a mission to solve an inheritance dispute in the House of Mansfeld. This mediation was protracted and in the meantime Luther was tormented by cramps in his chest. Luther anticipated his death many days beforehand because he was increasingly suffering many heart attacks. By 17 February 1546 the inheritance dispute had finally been resolved and at dinner that day Luther commented he would finally lie down to sleep in his coffin and allow the worms to have a good meal. The pain in his chest continued to worsen and many medications were tried on him, but to no avail.[1] In his last hours more than twenty people were with him, including his son Paul Luther. The theologian Justus Jonas documented his death.[2] Luther recited prayers, begged the Lord to take his soul and then his senses faded.[1] On 18 February 1546, Luther died at the age of 62 years. The reason for his death is assumed to be a cardiac infarct.[2]
The question of how Martin Luther died became essential to the fate of the Protestant Reformation. [...] Immediately after Luther's death, Catholic pamphlets spread rapidly, alleging that Luther had drunk himself to death with alcohol or hanged himself.
There have been articles that assert that many witnesses, scholars, and prominent medical experts affirm exactly the opposite of the “official” account and which may suggest that Luther possibly committed suicide. I'm not sure how likely that is.
https://www.barnhardt.biz/2019/10/02/martin-luther-probably-committed-suicide/
https://damselofthefaith.wordpress.com/2016/12/07/did-luther-commit-suicide/
1 Answers 2019-11-29
Most Old World cultures practiced a plethora of grappling and striking oriented martial arts, do we know of any Native American martial arts similar to boxing, wrestling, etc? I imagine most native cultures practiced various styles of wrestling throughout their histories, do we have any surviving accounts regarding the specifics of such techniques?
1 Answers 2019-11-29
I’m hoping some of the folks here can provide some recommendations on more digestible/readable books on the Eastern Front with interesting theses and more contemporary takes. One of my issues with Glantz is that, despite his thorough research and analysis, he sometimes can get lost in details and fail to provide an clear picture of what is happening in a battle or operation. That said, I’m open to trying a couple more of his works.
I happen to have some extra time since my workload typically decreases a bit in December and I’ll have some great time to do more reading. I’m looking mostly for military/warfare-focused books. Any suggestions?
Thanks!!!
1 Answers 2019-11-29
[deleted]
1 Answers 2019-11-29
1 Answers 2019-11-29
Quite a few times, I come across videos on youtube where Noah's flood is said to borrow from, or in some other way recycle, various components of Sumerian and Mesopotamian folklore that is much older than the writings in the book of genesis. I have looked into the validity of this claim, briefly, and am having a hard time verifying if it is true or not. So primarily, I want to know if this claim is accurate but I am also wondering if there is a standard by which historical claims may be verified for accuracy?
1 Answers 2019-11-29
If the Europeans that colonized the Americas got most of the native population killed by disease then were there any new diseases in the new world that killed any Europeans?
1 Answers 2019-11-29
1 Answers 2019-11-29
[deleted]
1 Answers 2019-11-29
With the advent of digital communication making it easier for banks to fight bounced checks and overdrafting, the threat of fraud seems to have shifted from more from systematic vulnerabilities to human error. This has got me wondering - what would various forms of exploitation from Renaissance-era banks, and are there any famous instances of ancient financial fraud?
As an example, what would stop someone with 100 Lira in their account with a Venitian bank from going to multiple bank locations, withdrawing 100 Lira from each before they have a chance to consolidate ledgers, subsequently booking it to another region or kingdom?
1 Answers 2019-11-29
3 Answers 2019-11-29
I suck at history and my high school teachers also didn't help much to spike my interest. But now I realize it's quite important for the understanding of where I'm standing and culture. So I want to start over and go from the beginning.
What titles do you recommend? Or videos, anything comprehensive.
2 Answers 2019-11-29
I just found out that the Royal Navy had a few smaller vessels with all-Danish crews that sailed under the Danish flag during WWII. After some seraching I've found these pictures and nothing else.
Which ships did they man, what did they do and where did they operate?
I'd also like to know why they decided to man them like that in the first place and where they recruited from.
1 Answers 2019-11-29
Cities like Riga had to have had to deal with large amounts of winter snow, right?
Did shopkeeps and tenets scrape their own path? Did animals and carts pack the snow down enough to walk on?
Did the city leaders/merchants/guilds hire day laborers to clean the roads?
1 Answers 2019-11-29
Much has been made of the power of comedy against the Nazis during the Second World War. Media portrayals of Nazis generally show them as lacking a sense of comedy outside of sadistic humor and cruelty. The Nazi propaganda films I'm most aware of are serious militaristic/antisemitic films like Triumph of the Will and The Eternal Jew rather than an equivalent to Charlie Chaplin's The Great Dictator or the Three Stooges' You Nazty Spy. Was there any significant effort on the Nazis' part to use humor to advance their own agenda? Would they have tried to satirize the Allies or their political opponents in film/other media? Would there have been popular jokes or styles of joke that would have been prevalent among the Nazi sympathizing populace?
2 Answers 2019-11-29
1 Answers 2019-11-29
Today:
You know the drill: this is the thread for all your history-related outpourings that are not necessarily questions. Minor questions that you feel don't need or merit their own threads are welcome too. Discovered a great new book, documentary, article or blog? Has your Ph.D. application been successful? Have you made an archaeological discovery in your back yard? Did you find an anecdote about the Doge of Venice telling a joke to Michel Foucault? Tell us all about it.
As usual, moderation in this thread will be relatively non-existent -- jokes, anecdotes and light-hearted banter are welcome.
7 Answers 2019-11-29
1 Answers 2019-11-29
Dear all,
this somewhat relates to my previous post here.
I am wondering what happens if several historians write about the same topic/event/phenomenon. As far as I can see, that happens all the time in history. Just think about how many books have been written about World War 1.
I am wondering how such historians are supposed to acknowledge the work of others, especially when what they cover and the arguments they make might at times be similar to the previous work of others. I understand that one is supposed to acknowledge the work of others having worked on the topic in the introduction. But, as seems to be normal practice, if one then proceeds to use primary sources to discuss that particular historical event then, one seems to be almost bound to make similar points as other historians that have written about this event before, even if one's overall interpretation is new and original.
In those cases, are historians meant to acknowledge such parallels with the work of others throughout the book/article with footnotes (On this see also... etc) or is the mention in the introduction considered sufficient? I am mainly wondering because I do not seem to find such footnotes in the work of historians that write on events etc that have been covered before [and it would also seem very impractical to me]. In fact, in popular books, often there isn't even a literature review to begin with. Maybe then it is just implied that while there might be parallels to the work of others, the interpretation of the author is new and original?
3 Answers 2019-11-29
The conquest of the Iberian peninsula began in 711 with the battle of Guadalete wherein an invading force of Berber Muslims defeated and killed the Visigoth king Roderic. Are there any credible accounts of the battle? Especially any that describe the course of the fighting.
The tertiary sources I’ve managed to find all say that Roderic was betrayed, either by a part of his army that stepped aside during a pivotal point of the battle or the potentially mythical “Count Julian” who aided in transporting the invaders across the strait of Gibraltar. Is this what probably actually happened or Is it just a folk tale? And if it is probably true was this sort of behind the back tactic commonly employed by Muslim armies? Would similarly devious tactics be permitted when fighting other Muslims?
Lastly, was the conquest of al-Andalus characterized as jihad by Muslim leaders? If so what hadith or Quranic verses were used in its justification? If it wasn’t, how was it characterized?
Thanks for any answers or information.
1 Answers 2019-11-29
My cursory research on the second question indicated that the US wasn't involved in battles in Europe until 1943, but I couldn't find anything on if there was an American presence prior to that; specifically I'd like to know if there were American troops present in Europe on October 31st 1942.
And how would someone find out their brother was MIA? Would it be in-person? A letter? A phone call?
How long would it take for the military to officially declare a soldier MIA, and how long between that decision and the family being notified?
(I hope that this sort of two-questions-in-one isn't a problem? I've never posted here before and as far as I could see there isn't anything in the rules against it.)
1 Answers 2019-11-29
Recent archaeological evidence suggests that Iron was used as weapons by south indians as early as 2200 BC which is almost a thousand years older than Hittites and other civilisations! There is also evidence that military elite Mitanni migrated from east to northern Iraq in 2nd millenium BC and entered agreement with Hittites in 1380 BC where Vedic Gods were invoked to solemnize the treaty. Is it possible these people intoduced iron tech?
1 Answers 2019-11-29