I'm writing a paper specifically on the division of Korea, but it seems most of my sources don't go into detail on the reason it was divided, they say "then Korea was split in two". I'm trying to go a bit more in depth with this paper than that.

EDIT: If you can direct me to other sources like certain books, journals, or websites to read more about this specific topic it would be greatly appreciated.

Is there a reason the Revolution seems to be perceived better then the civil war? Even in the mythos the Boston Tea Party and Declaration of Independence are revered whereas John Brown's Raid, Bleeding Kansas, and Nat Turner's rebellion are viewed darkly

I'm particularly interested in the food served and first hand accounts from guests/travelers. I would really appreciate it if someone could point me in the right direction.

Also, were there any noteworthy individuals who pursued drastically different border policies for the empire? if so, who were they and did their actions result in any significant change?

During the French Revolution there was undoubtedly a lot of deaths, even Louis XVI and his son so why let Napoléon live and escape Elba once and then put him on the second island to die? Why not just kill him like everyone else?

I'm particularly interested in the cremation process. Are there any specific archaeological finds from this era that shed light on the subject?

They must have traveled this distance regularly in order to discover tiny islands in the middle of vast open ocean. Would this have been a deliberate attempt to discover new land, or would it have happened during fishing expeditions or something similar?

Has participating in AskHistorians and observing how people ask questions shaped your own relationship with history, and how you think it should be taught to the general public? What disconnects do you notice between your own approach to history and the approach one sees in common questions, and how can it be rectified?

Immediately after WW2 what was the genocide called in the West or in its mainstream press?

Edit: More specifically middle class in the northeast/ New York United States.

Hello, I am a non-Westerner and almost every year throughout grade school we learn of the Holocaust. We read about Anne Frank, watch Holocaust documentaries, and sympathize with the plight of Jewish people. The same is done, and rightfully so, for blacks in this country.

I was surprised to learn later on that even non-Jews, such as gypsies and slavs, died in the holocaust.

But how come this same sentiment is not there for Native Americans? I would imagine this is more relevant to the US than European Jews. They had their whole continent stolen, population brought to near extinction, mass destruction of culture and civilization, and only get reservations while Jews get their own ethnostate.

(Hopefully this is the right sub for this question.)

It may sound ridicioulous but, did Hitler have any group devoted to searching about superstitious things? And before you comment, no I did not bade this comment off of Indiana Jones.