As a reminder, this subreddit has a 20 year rule and a no anecdotes rule. And just for consistency, let's talk about homeless people in the USA between 1945-1997.

Thanks!

I'm just wondering what a historian might make of this comment. Ty

I've tried to look this up but can't really find much about it, but this is a question that has been on my mind in recent times.

Basically, it is clear to me that Shinto and Buddhism coexisted peacefully, with many of their core beliefs lining up. One conflicting belief, though, stands out to me. In Buddhism, the cycle of rebirth is a central belief, and the focus lies on future lives as much as the current one. In Shinto, it is believed that deceased ancestors would pass on into the other world and be able to visit the present world and protect their descendants.

To be this seems like a rather big contrast. One religion focuses on the present life as well as the future life after rebirth, whereas the other one honors their dead for many generations.

How did these two religions manage to coexist peacefully while their core beliefs about the afterlife didn't seem to line up? Or am I missing something about their perspectives on the afterlife that does make them work well together? Or did the Japanese people simply 'pick' one of the two beliefs?

Mainly found it interesting as to how a man of low aristocratic birth could rise to such a status and bring France, a country with nothing but defeats in their recent times before he took power organize such a force in such a short amount of time.

It's a question that came up in discussion of this year's Fourth of July celebrations. Basically, is America 227 years old because the Constitution was fully ratified in 1790, or is America 241 years old since the Declaration of Independence was signed in 1776?

According to what I learnt at school, Cortés came from Spain, and conquered the Aztecs with minimal help from Tlaxcala. According to what I gather from my reading as an adult, it's mostly the other way around: Tlaxcalans, with some help from Spain, destroyed the Triple Alliance. In any case, then they appear to have simply vanished as an independent state, without any fuzz.

Looking through Wikipedia all I can gather is that they enjoyed higher status than other natives during the colonial era. However, it still doesn't explain how this independent state that had just crushed the main regional power (yes, with outside help, but still) just rolled over immediately and accepted a new foreign overlord.

So what happened to Tlaxcala after the fall of Tenochtitlan? When and how were they integrated into the Spanish empire and why did they go with it?

Am writing a dissertation on was Midway the turning point in the Pacific war. Just have NO books on the topic and can't find any.

Does anyone out there know any good books or documentaries or anything that covers the Pacific war and tries to answer why Japan lost?

Any help would be greatly appreciated ! Thanks.

[deleted]

[deleted]

I know about the Non-Aggression pact that the Soviet Union and Nazi German signed as well as the spheres of influence they both set up in Eastern Europe, but I am looking for documentation and more information about the Soviet Union's attempt to join the Axis, especially in 1940, as it is to my understanding that Molotov visited Berlin on November 12, 1940 in order to discuss the USSR's official entry.

Other supporting information such as trade deals and research cooperation would also help, as it is to my understanding that the Soviet Union shipped raw materials to Germany which fueled the Wehrmacht, and am looking for more evidence of the such.

Thanks!

So I was browsing the Assassin's Creed sub-reddit and found that the wall of Hieroglyphs from the Ubisoft Conference contains a message. I'm currently taking a class on Middle Egyptian so I recognize many of the symbols, but I'm not adept enough to translate them. As far as I know no one over there has translated the symbols. I was wondering if anyone here could help?

While technically a Sherlock Holmes story, the Valley of Fear was actually about (spoiler) an undercover Pinkerton detective infiltrating a gang in a mining town before turning them in(and then being murdered by Moriarty.... spoilers again).

I know there a fair few spies stories throughout history, but pretending to be a criminal to join a criminal organization and then betray them to the law? Was this a literary thing before Doyle?

Today, it seems like much of the topics that bond us together are relatively modern: television shows, sports, world events, etc. If I were a person sitting down in a pub or meeting someone in a public place, what would we talk about to establish rapport?

As a corollary, is the premise of my question fundamentally flawed? Was rapport not necessary until cities became large and the number of strangers interacting grew exponentially?

Would Egypt not have been extraordinarily difficult to defeat for the Romans? Even more so than Carthage?

I guess a lot of the downfall could be attributed to the decline of the Pharaonic family, itself. The first couple Ptolemies seemed to be quite good leaders.

Surely, the Egyptians could have fielded a formidable host to prevent invasion. Was it threat of Roman naval power controlling trade routes that the Egyptians feared? Just curious on the deeper intricacies of the whole scenario.

Would the Ptolemies been able to stand up the tests of time against the Romans had they had stronger, more unified leadership, as they had under Ptolemy I-III? Instead of infant kings and various regencies?

[deleted]

I am aware that Islamic world is a very large area. I am mainly interested in what is today called the Middle-East but I would also interested in others areas such as Iberia, Persia and Central Asia.