[deleted]
2 Answers 2017-05-26
I just finished watching Empresses in the Palace on Netflix and wondered about the harem after the emperor's death. This topic might be discussed in the longer original series, but I'm only a couple episodes in there and I don't know how accurate what they say would be, anyway.
So, historically speaking, during the Qing Dynasty, what happend to an emperor's harem (from empress all the way to female attendants), when an emperor died? I assume depending on their status (rank, children or not, maybe other things), the results for them were different, but what could they expect to happen to them?
1 Answers 2017-05-26
[deleted]
2 Answers 2017-05-26
By accessible, I both mean linguistically, and practically (could a merchant in Constantinople acquire a copy of the NT easily).
I imagine the answer's going to involve the fact that the Byzantime Empire is a 1000-year period; that's okay! I'm happy to have an answer that either focuses on the time period you're familiar with, or with an answer that discusses change over time.
1 Answers 2017-05-26
It just seems from a modern vantage to be an absurd concept. Cities spring from necessity and convenience, not from the will of one man, so to me it seems very strange that a person could just decree a city into existence. So how exactly did an ancient ruler just decide, "Here a city shall be" as it seems is so often stated in history books.
4 Answers 2017-05-26
Are there any Chinese, Arab or Indian maps that include Australia, for example? Did any of the Muslim traders that visited Asian islands ever sail further south? Any travel diaries?
They had knowledge of what is now Indonesia, and religions like Hinduism, Islam and Buddhism were/are popular in these areas.
Do we know anything about the extent of their knowledge of Australia?
1 Answers 2017-05-26
1 Answers 2017-05-26
1 Answers 2017-05-26
It seems unlikely to me that the Third Reich would have just let those claims go. Was there ever a dialogue between the Axis powers regarding their fate, and/or any secret plans on Germany's part to eventually reclaim them? If the latter case is true, did Japan ever suspect that such plans existed, and did they do anything to prepare for that eventuality?
1 Answers 2017-05-26
The Japanese royal family has the longest continuous reign on Earth, going back at least 1500 years and covering 125 monarchs. However, that doesn't necessarily mean there weren't any times when there was contention over who might be the next to ascend to the throne.
Google has failed me, largely because there is so much being said about the issue of female ascendency, and the current emporer's desire to abdicate, that it drowns out the results I hope for, assuming they even exist.
Has there ever been a situation in all of the Japanese royal family's history when the throne was contested between two potential heirs that claimed legitimacy? Is such a dispute even possible with the rules of ascension Japan has had previous to 1889?
2 Answers 2017-05-26
I'm aware that the Macedonian Phalanx was eclipsed by the Roman legion/maniple, but from what I've read that was mostly due to the Hellenistic states failing to properly use it: I.e. they didn't use it properly in conjunction with heavy cavalry, they fought on terrain ill-suited to the phalanx, made the sarissa too long, and didn't support it with other light infantry. At what point in history would the phalanx have assuredly lost even with proper use?
1 Answers 2017-05-26
This is a bit of a controversial question, and I have come across different beliefs about the Great Schism. For example, this comment thread. Some Catholic and other non-Orthodox Christians say that the Eastern Orthodox Church "veered away" from the early Church. Some Eastern Orthodox and other non-Catholic Christians say that the Roman Catholic Church "veered away" from the early Church.
However, it would be nice if someone were to set the record straight about it.
Did the RCC or EOC "veered away" from the early church? Which church became very different from the early Church theologically, practically, culturally, or structurally? Or is it something more complicated?
1 Answers 2017-05-26
It seems a bit strange to me why the US have so strong ties to Saudi Arabia. They wildly disagree on human rights, Saudi Arabia is member of OPEC that oil embargoed the west back in the 70s, it is known that Saudi Arabia have supported Islamic extremists - so what is it that make the US still one of its close allies, despite all those things?
2 Answers 2017-05-26
3 Answers 2017-05-26
Most Spaniards pronounce certain words with some sort of lisp, unlike any Latin american, why didn't this speaking pattern transferred over to the colonies?
1 Answers 2017-05-26
1 Answers 2017-05-26
I just got back from a trip to Wyoming and spent time at Fort Laramie. Fascinating.
I realized how little I know about the "settling" of the west - the early expeditions, the wagon trains, the gold rushes, the railways.
I'm looking for fairly easy to read, popular treatments that can get me up to speed on some of these things.
Any recommendations are welcome!
1 Answers 2017-05-26
So I read Dan Carlin's infamous Guns Germs and Steal a while ago and since then I've also read a few critiques and generally been made aware of the problems with it. I was just wondering if there were any more legitimate sources about this topic?
2 Answers 2017-05-26
Partly inspired on this question:
2 Answers 2017-05-26
1 Answers 2017-05-25
I'm sorry if this breaks rules and if so I accept the removal.
I'm in a debate and I'll not say for which side. One is saying "yes, there are historical records" and another is saying "no, they're actually no valid historical records"
Is there a certain answer? Why do historians waffle on the subject? There are huge stories about the surroundings of the situation. Why not the man himself other than word of mouth?
1 Answers 2017-05-25
To my understanding, Italy was not very much help to Nazi Germany in the second world war. They failed most of their operations, and were overall a disappointment. In 1943 when Mussolini surrendered, and General Pietro Badoglio took charge, were there any changes in their military success? Or were they still like they were before?
1 Answers 2017-05-25