In 1206 at the great gathering of clans where Temujin became Chinggis Khan, would there have been vendors and/or a marketplace? And if so, what would the vending stalls have looked like? Tents? I know wood wasn't the most common material on the steppes, so it doesn't seem like tables or benches would be readily available.
1 Answers 2017-04-01
Considering the horrific conditions brought about by crop failures, etc; I know that areas of the med were affected by such issues, though not to the same extent as northern Europe.
Did the Islamic world escape largely undamaged directly?
How did it affect their relationships with Christendom, with regards to war, trade, etc?
Really any information would be appreciated.
Thank you in advance.
1 Answers 2017-04-01
Hello, I'm trying to get an understanding of the Late Republic's Political system. It is my understanding that the People's Tribunes had to be plebeians. Weren't the Gracchus brothers both patricians? I've got bonus questions as well, how many people made up the Plebeian assembly (those who elected the People's Tribunes)? Could any Plebeian vote towards it? Was it also based on Century? Basically I'm just trying to understand, did Plebeian citizens directly vote on the Tribunes, or were officials selected for an assembly to then vote on the Tribunes?
1 Answers 2017-04-01
I understand there are a lot of variables that might change this, but an approximation?
It seems like all the veterans I read about entered the war in 1916 or 1917 (some I guess because they were American, but the British/Canadians too) which makes me think the odds were quite low.
Does anyone have some further insight on this?
2 Answers 2017-04-01
Is there evidence that this was happening? Was it just a rumor started by the Spartans to intimidate their rivals or a rumor started by their rivals to discredit the Spartans? If true, were other people of Dorian descent known to practice something similar?
1 Answers 2017-04-01
8 Answers 2017-04-01
While the serfs and peasants of the land were very poor, as well as tied to the land they worked on, there appeared to be no large slave trade in Medieval Western Europe, while these regions often had slaves in Roman times. While slavery did gain traction with the age of Exploration, what brought the end of slavery to Medieval kingdoms such as France, England, Castile, or the Holy Roman Empire?
1 Answers 2017-04-01
Today:
Saturday Reading and Research will focus on exactly that: the history you have been reading this week and the research you've been working on. It's also the prime thread for requesting books on a particular subject. As with all our weekly features, this thread will be lightly moderated.
So, encountered a recent biography of Stalin that revealed all about his addiction to ragtime piano? Delved into a horrendous piece of presentist and sexist psycho-evolutionary mumbo-jumbo and want to tell us about how bad it was? Need help finding the right book to give the historian in your family? Then this is the thread for you!
6 Answers 2017-04-01
as an aside if that's never been used as the basis for a novel, TV series, movie or play it should have been
1 Answers 2017-04-01
1 Answers 2017-04-01
Here we have the pharaoh looking broad faced, wide jawed, no hook nose, with some effeminate features.
2)Pic 2: http://www.crystalinks.com/ramses2london.jpg
But his supposed mummy has a crooked nose and elongated face as opposed to what he portrayed of himself. Ref Pic. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/84/Mummy_of_Ramesses_II_-_02.JPG
Something fishy here folks?.
2 Answers 2017-04-01
Yeah, yeah, yeah. At this point, no one should hopefully be too surprised by some of the answers cropping up since yesterday morning, as really, you've had four years warning to know that just as we are super serious for 364 days of the year, we get super silly for 1 of them. Or 2 of them if you don't believe in time-zone magic.
Anyways though, yes, the short stories you've been seeing - and reporting - are allowed today. The flairs have had a headstart, but as everyone likes to participate in the shenanigans, please be aware of a few ground rules we expect everyone to follow for /r/AskHistoricalFictionWriters aka /r/HistoricalWritingPrompts:
Accuracy: At its core, we hope that the answers from the day will still be providing generally useful information, simply in a different style than usual - similar to last year's /r/AskHistoricalFigures event. Of course, there is some leeway to allow for creative license, but we ask that in doing so you be judicious in your approach, and strongly suggest that you provide some way of getting that information in there, either through use of footnotes, a brief addendum, or other means.
Please show judgement and good taste: There are some topics that are going to be very difficult to tackle through a narrative structure as opposed to an academic one, so please consider how your 'story' will be received. Do not answer a question about rape with a story where a rapist is your protagonist, or one about genocide where the perpetrators are your main characters.
Don't Ruin Someone Else's Story: Collaboration is great, and if you want to write some 'fan fiction' to continue someone else's story, there isn't anything wrong with that, but please don't take it in a wildly different direction, unless you have checked with the OP already via PM. They might already have an idea of where they are going with it for follow-ups, and we don't want to see the canon get split!
Asking Questions: We'll be loose with the Trivia Seeking Rule today to give maximum opportunity for everyone. And while super leading questions are allowed, if not encouraged, please don't make them anachronistic!
"This is Stupid!": Look, this is the fifth year we have done this. You should expect it by now. If you don't like it, well, you're entitled to your opinion but please, don't get abusive towards people participating in what is very much an established tradition by now. Things will be back to normal tomorrow, OK?
3 Answers 2017-04-01
1 Answers 2017-04-01
A very good question was asked by /u/frugilegus here but never got answered.
I'd like to ask it again, maybe things will go better this time. Here's the text for those who don't want to follow the link:
In Max Hasting's popular history, "Armageddon", about the 1944-1945 offensives against Nazi Germany, he uncritically relates a narrative of Soviet atrocities at Nemmersdorf: "Hardly one civilian inhabitant survived. Women had been nailed to barn doors and farm carts, or been crushed by tanks after being raped. Their children had been killed." (quote from Hasting's text). He then goes on to quote from Karl Potrek's report.
Reading further online, there seems to be some doubt about this narrative, and that it may have been significantly embellished for propaganda purposes by Goebbels. Many of the articles claiming that seem to reference Bernhard Fisch's work.
Can the experts of /r/askhistorians comment - did Hastings get this wrong and spread Nazi propaganda 60 years after the fact, or is Fisch's reassessment of the events suspect?
1 Answers 2017-04-01
3 Answers 2017-04-01
Sorry if the question is a bit vague; happy to clarify, if need be!
1 Answers 2017-04-01
1 Answers 2017-04-01