Hello all,

I'm currently reading 'The Anglo-Saxons. A history of the beginnings of England' by Marc Morris.

Right now, I've just finished a chapter regarding St Wilfird and his life. During Wilfird's life, paganism still existed (strongly) in areas of what is now England. Penda - the last great Anglo-Saxon King only died in 655.

Morris writes about how Penda's death opened the floodgates for the last major kingdom on the island to allow Christian preachers to flood in, mostly from Northumbria. We have plenty of documentation regarding this in addition to further evidence of priests being sent around the island to convert the remaining pagans, but my question regards the opposite of this movement.

We know people didn't convert easily. We also know that a lot of converts actually were quick to relapse to their pagan ways following any sign of real 'cosmic threat' - Morris specifically cites the great plague of 664 - where we have written records of Anglo-Saxons restoring their old pagan temples are reaffirming their belief in the old Gods to combat the devastating plague.

What I'm interested in is - do we have any evidence, at all, of pagan Kings sending out preachers to their Christian neighbours - particularly at times of hardship. We know these people clung to their beliefs far longer than the Church would have liked and it just seems odd to me that there seems to have been no real movement to 'bring the Christians back into the fold'.

I appreciate that we've only really got Christian written sources to look at but does anybody at all write about this? Bede maybe? Is there any record of this occurring in the Anglo-Saxon chronicles?

Cheers!

Today I've visited Hungarian parliament building in Budapest. There in the assembly hall the main Hungarian dynasties are represented on the wall. From the left there is Àrpàds coat of arms, then House of Anjou, Hunyadi's coat of arms. Then somewhat strangely Jagiellon are represented not by their coat of arms i.e. the golden double cross on the blue field. They are represented by the polish eagle which was the coat of arms of Piast dynasty. Why is that the case? Is there a story behind it? The guide couldn't give me any answers for that so I'm asking here.

I've been reading a little online about Marshal Georgy Zhukov and his roles through World War II, after the war, and post-Stalin. He seems to have mostly held his power through these periods, but suddenly, in 1957, upon return from a foreign trip to Yugoslavia, he was accused of "non-party behavior" and stripped of his positions, forced into retirement, only six months after his crucial support kept Khrushchev in power.

What happened in those six months, and how did someone who survived Stalin's purges fall to post-Stalin politics?

Hello! I have been taking a second look at the Holocaust after digging into my family tree. I am curious how much the people of Germany knew about what was actually happening during WW2, and how they viewed what they knew. From my limited research skills, there’s not many sources of information on it. I have watched documentaries where they bring the citizens of surrounding towns into the liberated concentration camps, and they appear shocked. Yet, from what I’ve read, they were mostly aware of where the war was leading, including “death camps.” Can someone shed more light on this for me? How much did they know and how did they feel about it?

TIL that something like 70,000 people died in the Battle of Carthage. In a world without much in the way of technology or machinery, what do you DO with that many corpses? Did they attempt to retrieve (presumably valuable) armor and weapons? Did they bury them in mass graves somewhere?

The New Deal was in effect between 1933 and 1939, and in that time, the great depression didn't end. It only ended because of the massive spending caused by WWII. I've heard some sources say that the New Deal actually made things worse. The problem I've found with researching this is that it boils down to a battle between Keynesian and laissez-faire economics, so the advocates of each system will give an answer that fits their narrative. Of course, any answer is going to be more nuanced than government spending being simply good or bad.

This might be obvious, but I don’t know much about Samurai history. Toshirô Mifune’s character has different hair than almost every other man in the film. The rest of the men have very distinct shaved haircuts, but he and one other male character have nonshaved hair in buns. Does this have to do with the fact that he and the other man are samurais? Where did these haircuts for men in the Edo Period come from?

I read and watch social history, and they use letters to newspapers as a source. How do you tell it isn’t from a crank which is just printed to make everyone laugh, and elicit response letters?

Dear Historians, Im a student from Germany and currently writing an essay about the Korean War from 1950-53. As part of this essay I am asked to analyse a source. I am focusing my essay on the question of responsibility that I can conclude whose responsibility this war has been. Now I wondered if some of you may now a good source I could analyze in order to answer that question myself. Maybe some sort of political speech? I am clueless. Thanks in advance for any kind of help. Bye

The giant spider is one of the most omnipresent monsters in present-day fantasy and gaming but I can't think of any antecedent before Shelob in The Hobbit.

Greek myth has Arachne and there are trickster spider figures in African and American indigenous stories (and apparently one giant people-eating spider in Seneca stories.) But I can't find anything that Tolkien would have been building from when creating what is now a bread-and-butter fantasy monster.

I am from the USA so maybe a six pack is not a universal standard for beer grouping everywhere.

I couldn't find anything in the search regarding this topic. Only a couple that talked about the Han and Roman in relationship to each other but I'm more curious about how big and powerful the Han Dynasty really was in terms of external power. Or was much of it's praise in terms of internal function and stability.

Considering during the Rennaissance Western Europe began to gain more and more access to classical works, and this was the time that pike armies began to dominate the battlefield, did any commander ever use ancient works on Alexander the Great and his Macedonian phalanx to try and gain some insight on how to use said armies effectively?