ive been googling for the last few minutes and I can't find anything
1 Answers 2016-06-10
Jefferson Davis was famously reluctant for Confederate forces to invade the North at all, and my understanding of Lee's motivation for invading Maryland and Pennsylvania was purely to get a better bargaining position and pressure the Union into recognizing the Confederacy.
So - was this pretty much true across the board? Was there a movement, faction, or any individuals who backed secession but actually wanted more (such as a complete take over the Union and essentially go from the United States back to confederacy model rather than having two separate countries). Maybe some believed the Union would never stop until they'd won or were destroyed? It seemed clear early on that the South simply didn't have the capabilities or infrastructure in place to win a protracted conflict since most the manufacturing and industrialization was to the North, perhaps this would have contributed to such a sentiment?
e: Clarified text
3 Answers 2016-06-10
What are the duties and orders i have to fulfill? How long would my "work day" be during the siege? And what could I do to pass the time and have fun? where there games and contests that took place inside the camp or even brothels to ease the tension among the men?
3 Answers 2016-06-10
After reading a blog post, talking about certain Conservative Democrats, who joined and didn't join the Republican Party after 1964, it got me thinking of another similar question; why didn't the following join the Republican Party? The list below is taken from that blog:
Where as, only two (according to the blog) joined Republican Party: Strom Thurmond and Miles Godwin.
I've never been able to find a definitive answer as to why those names from the first list never joined.
1 Answers 2016-06-10
Today:
You know the drill: this is the thread for all your history-related outpourings that are not necessarily questions. Minor questions that you feel don't need or merit their own threads are welcome too. Discovered a great new book, documentary, article or blog? Has your Ph.D. application been successful? Have you made an archaeological discovery in your back yard? Did you find an anecdote about the Doge of Venice telling a joke to Michel Foucault? Tell us all about it.
As usual, moderation in this thread will be relatively non-existent -- jokes, anecdotes and light-hearted banter are welcome.
8 Answers 2016-06-10
[deleted]
3 Answers 2016-06-10
My grandmother was born in 1923. So she was almost 20 during WW2. Lived in Southern Sweden, around 60km south of Gothenburg. She sais she heard bombs and aeroplanes etc. Could this be true?
1 Answers 2016-06-10
So I've been reading a few full length books recently, such as 'A Concise History of Germany' by Fulbrook (approx. 1500-2000) and also David Law's account of the UK's Coalition government (May 2010-May 2015). But I've also been listening to the BBC's History Extra podcast where they get fully fledged academic historians to come and discuss their work every week.
Simply put, I realised that there was some qualitative difference between the works that academics were writing and the work I'm reading. Put I can't put my finger on it. What's the difference here? How does one make this sort of high functioning history? What are the methods and the methodology? Is there even a clear cut difference?
3 Answers 2016-06-10
Catalans, Basques, Galicians, Andalusians - all seem like nations ready and willing to be sovereign, mostly in the world of Europe where everyone fights for their local independence. So how did they all end up as a single, Spanish nation? Is the answer as easy as "Empire", or is it more complex?
1 Answers 2016-06-10
1 Answers 2016-06-10
2 Answers 2016-06-10
A friend was telling me about a story of a German cargo submarine which was used to circumvent the British blockade early in WWI. It facilitated trade with ports in New England and made two recorded trips.
Is this story true? What was the name of this boat? Is there any further research out there?
1 Answers 2016-06-10
[https://youtu.be/KLjvfqnD0ws](This one, in particular.)
There was a Facebook discussion on it recently, and people were commenting on it being "bad". I've seen a few posts about it here before, but my reddit search skills apparently are not up to snuff, so I'm asking again.
1 Answers 2016-06-10
So this will be a pretty controversial post so bear with me...
https://www.ata-a.org.au/a-bad-day-in-the-bundestag/
TL;DR This article argues that the 'genocide scholar's researching the history of genocide are unfairly focusing on Armenian deaths even though number of Muslim deaths were roughly equal.
The resolution refers to the ‘almost complete extermination of the Armenians’ and the ‘pogroms’ against other Christians, namely the Assyrians and Chaldeans. In fact, hundreds of thousands of Armenians survived the war, in the Ottoman Empire and surrounding lands. The figure of one or 1.5 million ‘massacred’ is a double untruth because the true death toll was probably about 600,000, still a huge number, without any need of exaggeration.
And the most important part:
Furthermore, those who died were not all ‘massacred’: many were but by far the greater number died of exposure, disease or malnutrition or were killed in combat, the exact combination of causes which took the lives of about 2.5 million Ottoman Muslim civilians during the war. There is no mention in this resolution of the Muslim death toll or of the slaughter of Muslims by Armenians, especially when northeastern Anatolia was occupied by the Russians and their Armenian protégés between 1916-18. The archival evidence of survivors indicates that at least 500,000 Muslims were massacred between 1914-19.
My question is are these claims true and if so why is one only of them considered genocide and not the other?
1 Answers 2016-06-10
Before their conquest by Alexander, what was the extent of the Achaemenid Empire's knowledge of world geography? Would Carthage around 300 BCE be known to them? What about Italy and Spain?
3 Answers 2016-06-10
I'm currently writing a Walker attempted assassination / JFK assassination short story, and although it's going great, I need to be as historically accurate as possible. This is the only trouble I have regarding this.
1 Answers 2016-06-10
1 Answers 2016-06-10
One of my greatest questions about the situation of the Berlin wal isl why would people try to jump over a wall made to be impossible to jump over instead of driving a few hours west and crossing in one of the least dangerous zones?
Another way to put this question is, what kind of provisions did Eastern Germany make to make sure people were not crossing the border throughout its entire frontier with Western Germany?
2 Answers 2016-06-10
I see modern special forces today wearing masks as a tool of psychological warfare? Why didn't armies before wore masks during battle to have a psychological effect on their opponent? Was there an instance of a military doing this in history?
1 Answers 2016-06-10
2 Answers 2016-06-10
Poisonous foods were a no brainer. You eat, you die. But how about certain foods which are nutritional or beneficial for a certain reason. To cure a cough for instance.
1 Answers 2016-06-10
1 Answers 2016-06-10
The common imagery that comes to mind when thinking of liberated cities of WW2 is people in the streets waving flags and hugging solders as they marched down the street (I think I've seen footage of such events). Was that just press re-enactments or was it real. If so, how was it organized? Where did they get the flags? If not, what was the liberation actually like?
1 Answers 2016-06-10