I just watched the Danish movie 'Land of Mines', and it was shocking to learn about this. I have been google searching the validity of the story, and learned that using German POWs as minesweeper is not a news. Now, I have read about the French using them from this source, and justified it by arguing that there is no German government to react to it. I guess I understand (not necessarily agree, but regardless) the idea behind, 'you put it, you clean it up'.However, this movie is about using teenaged POWs who were conscripted to Volkssturm. I have couple of questions regarding this topic, and I realize this is badly documented and reported, so any answer to any of them, or even shining a small insight into it is much appreciated.
What usually happened to the teenagers who were in the Volkssturm when they were captured? Were they considered as regular adult soldiers and got the same treatment? I thought they would just be sent home. Also, it is one thing using/forcing POWs to do the dangerous job, but it is another to use minors. So, even if they could argue against the international law, doesn't minor soldiers fall under another law? How did the international court react to this?
The movie portrays unnecessary amount of hatred towards the German POWs. I mean yes, they have every reason to hate them, but to the level of not caring at all for their well being? The movie portrays them not getting any steady food supply and not even given any equipment for safety. For me, it doesn't make much sense, because wouldn't lessening the casualty by giving them adequate equipment and some sort of steady food supply be in their best interest, so they can stand better before the international court if there were to be trouble? I mean would they hate them so much that they don't care about inexperienced teenagers dying? Also, they are doing the dangerous job for them, I don't understand why they wouldn't care about their health and well being, at least to an adequate level. Or is it just dramatization from the movie?
I saw one guy has the patch that says 'Kommando Dänemark'. Would they have been occupying force in Denmark who were captured when Germany capitulated, hence why the movie portrays them as soldiers with no battle experience? I thought Volkssturm were mainly created for the war in mainland Germany, especially against the Soviet Union, so why would they be in Denmark? If there were no Volkssturm in Denmark, why were minor soldiers stationed there?
Lastly, it is not like the Allies didn't have adequate ways to clear mines. There are some M4 Sherman Variants that is specifically built for this. Why not just use them? I just don't understand how this was all necessary. Everything the Allies who used POWs to clear mines just doesn't make much sense. From my understanding, they are breaking the Geneva convention, and went the extra mile to argue they have the right to use them, just to leave them with no equipment, and some even using minors, which you cannot argue your way out of. Is it just simple revenge mentality, or was logistics that difficult to borrow a mine sweeper from their allies? I mean, so many countries try to keep a good image of themselves, but this case seems like they are trying extra hard to look bad.
This movie was not bad as a movie, but seems too dramatized to be a historical movie. However it was an actual event, so I wanted to know what was actually happening. Anybody who can lend me some knowledge would be greatly appreciated.
1 Answers 2016-05-17
Specifically, during the reign of the Mongol Empire.
2 Answers 2016-05-17
It seems a lot more economically efficient to enslave the local population rather than ship them across the Atlantic.
1 Answers 2016-05-17
[deleted]
3 Answers 2016-05-17
Sorry if I'm jumping the gun by a month on the 20 years subreddit rule but I got interested in this subject when I saw this thread:
https://www.reddit.com/r/russia/comments/4jl0jd/til_the_russian_communists_would_came_back_to/
I was really struck by it and wanted to know if this was just conspiracy talk or if there are really any evidence of malpractice.
Thanks! I really love this sub.
1 Answers 2016-05-17
1 Answers 2016-05-17
By all accounts, 6th army was the cream of the German army during WW2, having the best equipped and trained soldiers. Why weren't they put into action on the Eastern front until after Barbarossa had failed?
1 Answers 2016-05-16
So recently I've been watching a lot of Westerns, and I notice many characters spinning their revolvers. I do not mean spinning the revolver as a trick, like seen by Johnny Ringo is Tombstone, I mean spinning the revolver as it is holstered. I'm sure it's not that loaded of a question but it sparked my interest. I know hollywood tends to put cliche's in their movies so I'm wondering if this actually happened.
1 Answers 2016-05-16
2 Answers 2016-05-16
I'm looking for a pile of books to read, specifically at the causes of the current state of affairs with the conflict between "The West" and the "Arab World". I'm especially interested in how the processes of colonization and the subsequent decolonization created the stage for this conflict, and also of the rise of anti-western groups like Al Qaeda and ISIS.
1 Answers 2016-05-16
2 Answers 2016-05-16
Whites in the South fought hard to prevent integration. Was there an economic motive as well as an ideological one? Did whites as a whole profit from Jim Crowe? Or did freeing up the economy for some 20% of the population provide economic growth for both races?
1 Answers 2016-05-16
I know that in some parts of the world like medieval europe, marking of the body was considering sinful, however regardless of that, how long would the process have taken for one that would want one?
I know these days that tattoo artists have various sessions, however, I'm looking more so for the medieval perspective and time frame, given that I'm writing a story which involves each person of a particular military group, bearing the same symbol on their back or arm.
Also, keep in mind said symbol would either be the length of the arm and/or back and would only be black, with no colour. If you know the type of dye they would use and what tools they used as well, that helps too.
1 Answers 2016-05-16
1 Answers 2016-05-16
I am curious, for those who know about the specifics of this-- what are some products that Eastern Bloc nations were famous for producing and selling? This could be to their own citizens, or to other Communist countries. I know East Germany produced the Trabi, a fibreglass car. Were there signature products in Romania? Hungary?
3 Answers 2016-05-16
IIFC, the main reason behind the conflict between the Angevins Plantagenet's and the Capet's was the fact the Henry II and his successors did not pay homage for their lands. Wouldn't a solution to this would simply declare independence? Obviously the Capets will try to fight back but wouldn't this destroy any legal avenues they had?
1 Answers 2016-05-16
I know that slavery in the Islamic world functioned differently than New World plantation slaves in that slaves could eventually earn their freedom in different parts of the muslim world. But were children born to slaves considered slaves as well or were they considered free people and converted to islam?
3 Answers 2016-05-16
Reading Latin literature or touring Roman archaeological sites in Europe, it’s clear that the fish sauce called garum was a huge part of Roman life. Why did its production and consumption die out? Today most Europeans know the stuff only if they’ve been to a Vietnamese restaurant, and it doesn’t seem so appetizing, though it was once a beloved delicacy. Are there any isolated Mediterranean hamlets where garum survived into the medieval era and later?
1 Answers 2016-05-16
[deleted]
1 Answers 2016-05-16
Additionally, if it did fall by the wayside, when did this happen and where became the new Rome?
1 Answers 2016-05-16
Was it really worth starting a war just to avoid paying their workers one cent? Wouldn't a war inevitably be more expensive and destructive than abolition?
3 Answers 2016-05-16
2 Answers 2016-05-16
Whenever I approach the topic of people who were writing history in medieval Europe the opinion of their work tends to be pretty negative. Arthurian legends are usually taken to describe why the entire process of writing history was full of inaccuracies and fictions. I would be really interested to find out if there were any notable exceptions to this, who possibly took a more analytical approach to understanding the past?
1 Answers 2016-05-16
Listening to the Joe Rogan Experience and wanted a more educated answer.
1 Answers 2016-05-16
What could a person who lived in medieval times get for a single gold coin in 13th century? How valuable is it? I know coins differ greatly in weight and value, as well as place to place. so lets just place it in 13th century England. What would be the equivalent in modern money?
1 Answers 2016-05-16