1 Answers 2015-11-09
Welcome to Monday Methods.
Today's post is inspired by the persistent question Was Machiavelli's "Prince" a work of satire?
The field of history has traditionally been focused on written narratives of the past, from Herodotus' Histories, the Secret History of Procopius, period diaries, and other accounts.
This raises the question of how historians should interact with pieces of literature from the past that do not attempt to be non-fiction narratives of past or contemporary events.
Said another way, how can historians look at poems, songs, and literature from the past, and draw conclusions from them? Can generalizations be made about the concerns and tastes of the society that produced them? Or should they be read narrowly as the views of the author?
To provide an example, can Voltaire's Candide be read as representing Enlightenment views on faith, optimism, and religion? Or is Candide only reflective of Voltaire's views?
4 Answers 2015-11-09
Sort of like how a lot of english words are written like they were pronounced a long time ago
1 Answers 2015-11-09
What if Germany had scrapped the Schlieffen Plan and instead focused on holding Alsace-Lorraine from the French, as well as attained little Russian territory purely for defensive reasons? I am not suggesting a full-scale invasion of Russia, since that's the last thing the Germans want, but a purely defensive position in hopes of supporting Austria-Hungary and not upsetting the British for disrupting the balance of power.
1 Answers 2015-11-09
It throws away most of the current ideas of how things went in the past.
1 Answers 2015-11-09
From the little I understand, it was once a powerful city state which exerted enormous influence over Oaxaca. By the time the Spanish arrived, its power had declined enormously and it was divided. I understand that this question will be massive, so I'd love book recommendations as well!
1 Answers 2015-11-09
His main claim was based on Leviticus 20:21: "if a man marries his brother's wife, ..."
But his brother was dead. In Genesis 38, Onan was ordered to sleep with his dead brother's wife Tamar, and when he did not fulfill his brotherly duty, he was put to death by God.
I don't mean to start a debate on biblical interpretation. I'm just wondering how such arguments worked at that time. Would any theology professor point Genesis 38 out to him that he didn't really have a strong case?
1 Answers 2015-11-09
I've heard a lot of reasons why the civil war happened but I never understood why the US didn't let the southern states secede, like a divorce.
1 Answers 2015-11-09
Batsignal /u/Mictlantecuhtli, /u/Cozijo? Interpret some architecture and artifacts for us! What are the challenges of mortuary archaeology for questions like this?
2 Answers 2015-11-09
According to Wikipedia, in Landsknecht mercenary armies, there were special front-line troops called Doppelsöldner (Who recieved double pay). These guys were the ones who fought in the frontline, however some were armed with really large swords instead of a pike, and being proficient with one of these immediately qualified you for Doppelsöldner status. These Zweihänder swords were supposedly used on the front lines of pike formations for the explicit purpose of breaking up 'push of pike' engagements, i.e. two pikeman armies going directly against eachother.
However, the same wikipedia article states that whether or not the use of zweihänder swords to break up enemy pike formations was actually effective is disputed.
Wikipedia being Wikipedia, I didn't really know what to think. As such I figured I would ask here: How much do we know of the use of two-handed swords in pike formations and how effective it was at resolving push of pike-stalemates? Surely the Landsknechts wouldn't have used those kinds of soldiers (And spent so much money on actually getting soldiers to take the job) if the two-handed sword tactic was mostly ineffective?
1 Answers 2015-11-09
1 Answers 2015-11-09
1 Answers 2015-11-09
Most of the orphanages where the girls came from were from orphanages in Honfleur, Dieppe, La Rochelle and the general hospitals of Paris; thus in urban settings. Yet they were sent out in their hundreds to colonize and settle down and clear deeply forested areas in order to build an agrarian society. This can not have been an easy transition for these girls, and one may wonder how the education and training they received in these mostly urban orphanages might have prepared them for such a life.
Do we have any records of how the Filles du Roy experienced their settlement, and of how they adapted to this new lifestyle? Did they see their new life as an improvement, were they mostly satisfied overall or did they put up with their lot in resignation?
2 Answers 2015-11-09
It's always seemed odd to me that I could never get a haircut on a Monday in the US because all hair salons and barber shops are closed.
1 Answers 2015-11-09
3 Answers 2015-11-09
I have always wondered about the actual or tangible autonomy of collaborationist governments and regimes working with the Nazis during World War Two. Was there a distinction between say the Slovakian Republic and the Vichy government in how they were treated and viewed by the Germans? Did the Nazis make a distinction between protectorates and their "allies" like the Arrow Cross regime in Hungary for example? Or were all of these various collaborating entities just independent on paper rather than practice? Thanks
1 Answers 2015-11-09
I know he adopted that hat as his signature look as a gimmick to be the tallest dude in any 100 mile radius, but he always seems to have been able to buy a new one of these hats in town without much fuss. Was it a fashionable hat, or at least a common one, during his political life?
2 Answers 2015-11-09
Babes In The Woods:
Oh, don't you remember, a long time ago, Those two little babies, their names I don't know They were stolen away one bright, summer's day And left in a wood, so I've heard folks say.
Sweet babes in the wood Sweet babes in the wood Oh, don't you remember Those babes in the wood
Now the day being gone and the night coming on Those two little babies sat under a stone They sobbed and they sighed, they bitterly cried Those two little babies they laid down and died
Sweet babes in the wood Sweet babes in the wood Oh, don't you remember Those babes in the wood
Now the robins so red, how swiftly they sped They put out their wide wings and over them spread And all the day long on the branches among They sweetly did whistle and this was their song
Sweet babes in the wood Sweet babes in the wood Oh, don't you remember Those babes in the wood
4 Answers 2015-11-09
I live on a lake called Maspenock which supposedly means choice fishing place in the Eastern Algonquin language. The area was inhabited by the Nipmuck tribe and I am wondering how exactly would a Nipmuck person have actually fished in a lake back then?
2 Answers 2015-11-09
Also, what would be the fastest way to get from Spain to, say, Rome? Thanks.
1 Answers 2015-11-09
Its something i wondered, as to my reasoning the system of being born into a role (e.g. farmers raising sons to be farmers) must have made life and its worries much simpler.
I suppose religion also played a big part in mental health.
1 Answers 2015-11-09
So I understand the whole idea of modernization as a weapon to be employed during the Cold War. Get the Third World 'up to speed' with our aid (advice, money, 'experts'), get them to vote, and all sorts of beautiful things will happen.
Atleast, that seemed to be the way to go during the first years of the Cold War. The idea that sped up modernization could be achieved seemed to stick, though the U.S. started to support authoritarian regimes (specifically those led by military men!) to achieve this. What arguments did U.S. policy makers use to go down this path?
Can this be ascribed to a fear of the destabilizing, seductive nature of Communism (and the military as the most effective antidote to such seduction, shooting Comrade Cupid in the face, if you will)?
Were military men simply easier to control, as opposed to democratically elected leaders (who will atleast perceive a certain support from the people)?
Thanks in advance for any illuminating answers.
1 Answers 2015-11-09
Full quote:
British ships had once participated aggressively in the slave trade, but the British government later renounced the practice and pressured other nations to do the same. The policy responded both to humanitarian antislavery sentiments and to the hope of expanding the market for British goods by turning slaves into consumers.
Chasteen 101
2 Answers 2015-11-09