Taken a large interest in the Crusades and in particular, Saladin. Thoughts on this?
1 Answers 2015-08-03
Traditionally the idea in China, and I believe a similar idea also exist in Persia and India, is that the conquering barbarian would eventually end up completely taking the conquered culture.
But I seem to remembers some scholars were arguing that this wasn't the case and they resisted culturization, or brought parts of their own culture, or actually only pretended to be culturized.
so what's the current scholarly consensus, or where are we on this debate?
1 Answers 2015-08-03
Ask Historians brethren, I think you will find this AMA very interesting. Please come on by.
History lovers,
Click here to go to the AMA at /r/History
We are happy to announce an AMA with Indy Neidell, host and author of the The Great War-YouTube Channel). The channel is following the events of World War I week by week, 100 years later in weekly episodes. Additionally, bigger topics related to World War I are explored in special episodes, important historical figures get biography episodes and we frequently answer historical questions by our viewers in Q&A videos.
You can start binge watching right here.
There is also the link to the Youtube channel directly.
They just celebrated their first birthday and thanks to the support from /r/History and other reddit communities, they recently reached 100.000 subscribers. So, they wish to say thank you from the whole team.
Indy is from Houston, TX, has a bachelors' degree in history, lives in Stockholm and is also a musician by trade.
1 Answers 2015-08-03
5 Answers 2015-08-03
I know it was due to birth and your family history, so it was more a caste rather than a social class. But what functional differences were there? Was there intermarriage between them? How did the system actually come about?
1 Answers 2015-08-03
1 Answers 2015-08-03
The Reichstag fire on 27 February 1933, led to the "improvisation" and approval of the Reichstag Fire Decree the next day, which impaired many of the civil liberties of the German people, and gave the National Socialists under Hitler the legal means to imprison those who were considered opponents to his government, and the ability to suppress publications against them. The document was, undoubtedly, one of the most important stepping stones towards a complete, one-party Nazi dictatorship. I find it hardly possible that a fire could break out, and in less than 24 hours Hitler manages to blame the Communists for the fire, convince the public, arrest thousands of members of the communist party all while creating an extremely significant legislation and attaining approval from Von Hindenburg in one day. Although I'm sure most of us question the legitimacy of the Reichstag fire, and all are suspicious of the convenience of the fire and extremely quick process of the elimination of Hitler's main political enemies in Germany and an attainment of increased power in one day, is there any proof (primary sources) that possibly indicate the Nazis as being responsible for the crime? I understand that the true instigator of the fire is still unknown, but I feel that the convenience of the event and the extremely fast elimination of Hitler's enemies along with his increased power in one day is reasonable grounds to suspect that it was a Nazi plot to attain further legal power and incriminate and silence his opponents.
2 Answers 2015-08-03
1 Answers 2015-08-03
This is a question that has been burning in my mind for quite some time, but a song that I've recently stumbled across kind of solidified my curiosity on the subject.
Whenever I hear older songs (typically early radio era songs from the US), I have a hard time understanding how they fit into the broader social context and psychology of the time. The example that I'll use is "Barney Google", but I think that this question applies to any other song that is kind of comparably "empty" of content: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ThYl5fT-JIQ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1923_in_music
I'm not sure if there are modern parallels to this or not, as I'm not well versed (no pun intended) in current trends in music. My question is "how did people feel about music like this?". I kind of assume that the reason behind its creation has to do with the general forces of capitalism -- in this example, Barney Google was a super popular comic strip character, so there would be name recognition that could potentially drive sales.
How is it that songs like would resonate with the public so strongly? Are there records of people saying things like "X song makes me feel youthful/lively/etc."? I have a hard time imagining a song about Charlie Brown reaching wide recognition these days, although things like YouTube, etc., would certainly allow music to get around through other channels. A song like Barney Google seems to be ridiculously saccharine and empty by modern standards, making it difficult to wrap my head around how people might have enjoyed it when it was fresh in public consciousness.
1 Answers 2015-08-03
The votes are in, and July's winners are clear!
Taking the "User's Choice" award for the month was /u/vepr157, for his answer to the question: "What were the primary differences between Soviet Sub designs and US sub designs during the cold war? what "Doctrines" did those designs build towards?"
Taking the "Flair's Choice" award was /u/Tiako, writing in answer to "Did the Roman Empire have a system in place for how they might have dealt with large, violent coastal raiding parties originating from beyond their control, such as the vikings? To go along with the theme for this week, how might coastal raiders that were caught be punished?".
Congratulations to the winners, and a thank you to the people who helped out by voting and linking threads in the Sunday Digest, as well as thanks to everyone who contributed in the past month!
2 Answers 2015-08-03
Alchemy was practiced by humans for aeons. Today we are educated that the primary goals of alchemy were the transmutation of metals (into gold) and the pursuit of an elixir of immortality.
While I know that the axioms of the field are well refuted, surely over the course of thousands of years, the pursuits of alchemists must have spread further than these two topics and surely if not by accident they would have come across some interesting chemical compounds.
My question is did the field of alchemy make any real discoveries? What use was an alchemist? Did they create or discover any poisons/explosives/alloys?
1 Answers 2015-08-03
I'm writing a story set in the 1890's and 1900's and one character must leave his discipleship as a blacksmith due to a lack of need for such people and he can only get a job in a mine or other lower position. Is that what could possibly happen in those years?
1 Answers 2015-08-03
As the title says, what is the current viewpoint of the rebellion in current Chinese historiography? From what I read, he is officially seen in a positive manner as a somewhat proto-Communistic socialist revolutionary by the central government.
Is this correct and what are the varying viewpoints in current Chinese academia?
1 Answers 2015-08-03
1 Answers 2015-08-03
It seems like every other documentary other than Adolf is about him
1 Answers 2015-08-03
I keep hearing nostalgia about the 1990s. About how much better and simpler it was. Personally I really don't know since I was born in 1996. As a result I'm asking around for people who can provide me a detailed description and explanation.
What was it really like living in the 1990s if you lived in First World?
1 Answers 2015-08-03
1 Answers 2015-08-03
Additionally, what countries would they be sent to? Could they be in the same country as Peace Corp volunteers?
1 Answers 2015-08-03
1 Answers 2015-08-03
I was watching the end of Shindler's list, and wondered this. So I decided to come here. Was it a "take us down they go down with us" kind of deal?
1 Answers 2015-08-03
The Associated Press posted their old article about the atomic bombings which contained the following phrase:
President (Harry) Truman disclosed in a White House statement at 11 a.m. Eastern War Time, today that the first use of the bomb — containing more power than 20,000 tons of TNT and producing more than 2,000 times the blast of the most powerful bomb ever dropped before — was made 16 hours earlier on Hiroshima, a Japanese army base.
It's clear to me that Eastern War Time is analogous to Eastern Standard/Daylight Time. But what is the distinction? Was this before EST/EDT was referred to as a time zone? Did it have applications in the clarity of communications between military forces on different continents? Why would this have been more effective than just using the normal time zones?
EDIT: Title typo, sorry. "An article released today by the AP"
1 Answers 2015-08-03
Forgive my poor wording, this question is a bit hard for me to phrase. Essentially, I'm just wondering when and where the switch from "day is bright, night is dark" to "the next day starts when it's still dark out and includes the sunrise and sunset and then some" was made and for what reason.
EDIT: Basically, why does midnight signal a new day instead of sunrise and when did anyone decide that it should be like that?
2 Answers 2015-08-03
I just watched a TV show about WWII, and it talked about the P-51 in Europe and the Hellcat in the Pacific, and the B-17 in Europe and the B-29 in the Pacific. What made these and other planes more suited for one theater than the other?
3 Answers 2015-08-03
I searched around here a bit and didn't come up with anything, but if this has already been answered before I apologize -
To be clear, I'm asking about immigrants who came to America to work and save up money to send home to whichever country they came from.
Did they send home American currency or was this exchanged at the bank first for home currency, and were these processes usually handled by banks or some other organization(s)?
I'm most interested in Chinese immigrants but am also curious about those from other countries since I imagine the process might be handled differently from country to country?
1 Answers 2015-08-03