1 Answers 2015-07-25
1 Answers 2015-07-25
I thought about this after looking at the census on this map. The only black governor for a long time was Pinchback in Lousiana. But assuming the map is correct, South Carolina and Mississippi had a larger black population than white population. Were there any movements at the time for black governors or other state wide offices?
1 Answers 2015-07-25
1 Answers 2015-07-25
Labour's 1983 manifesto famously pledged to leave the EEC, stating:
2 Answers 2015-07-25
4 Answers 2015-07-25
I am currently in Rome on holiday with my wife and her 10 year old nephew. Tomorrow we will be doing a tour of the Domitilla Catacombs and the Cappuccini Chapel(Santa Maria della Concezione dei Cappuccini). The later features a crypt decorated with the bones of 4,000+ friars buried between 1500 and 1870. While unusual, this is not the only example of Catholic churches or crypts decorated in this manner.
This has gotten me thinking about the Catholic tradition against cremation, which I had always heard was to allow the body to remain intact for resurrection after the Second Coming (I am Lutheran so can not speak with any authority in the matter). If that is the case, though, why would the Church allow a skeleton to be disassembled?
EDIT: During the tour ("Crypts and Catacombs of Rome," highly recommended), the guide gave an answer. The tradition (and there was no indication if there was an official Church policy) was that only "the skull and two bones" were needed for resurrection. Supposedly, the skull and crossbones symbol was thus used in graveyards as a symbol of resurrection but eventually morphed into death, danger, and (eventually) piracy.
2 Answers 2015-07-25
2 Answers 2015-07-25
US bought Louisiana from the French for $15 million. I read over the internet that some people say it was cheap. I thought $15 million at the time was expensive? I googled how much the price would be today adjusting to today's inflation and it is worth $225 million. Am I wrong to think $15 million was expensive in the 1800's?
Edit: Wording
1 Answers 2015-07-25
1 Answers 2015-07-25
Considering they traded regularly with each other was there any cultural exchanges or embassies established?
1 Answers 2015-07-25
1 Answers 2015-07-25
Nowadays, American prisons seem generally designed to punish criminals while keeping them separate from the general population. Was this always the case?
1 Answers 2015-07-25
We celebrate the 10th year more than almost any other in anniversaries. The 30th birthday is objectively very similar to the 29th or 31st, but viewed as a "big one." It's crazy to think that our numbering system has actually impacted how we celebrate as a society.
Do we know of civilizations that used base-12 number systems celebrate 6, 12, and 144 as more special holidays? What years were the "big ones" in ancient cultures, and why? (I'm specifically interested in "Eastern" and "Roman" history, but I'll love anything you know)
1 Answers 2015-07-25
1 Answers 2015-07-25
1 Answers 2015-07-25
I came across this recent post about a "wartime monopoly game" that admits it included only wooden game pieces instead of metal because of the war effort. Why was this so extreme? I knew metals and other things were rationed and so forth but I never thought such tiny amounts would even be subject to it. Why was the need so great when we had built railroads with seemingly endless mines and metals at our disposal? What greater lengths were taken in kind? What sorts of things were subject to these restrictions? Did it have a lasting effect on anything post-war?
1 Answers 2015-07-25
1 Answers 2015-07-25
After the fall of the Western Roman Empire, the population of Rome shrunk drastically, and afaik it took centuries until it regained its original population and geographical sprawl. When did the "modern" Rome become as large as the ancient one?
1 Answers 2015-07-25
1 Answers 2015-07-25
Were slaves treated differently in California and the say Colorado and how were they treated by their owners or other miners in the area.
1 Answers 2015-07-25
To my understanding, the standard Pre-Marian battle formation consisted of a layered system in which Hastati engaged first, followed by Principes who would fill in the gaps, and finally Triarii if the shit hit the fan. Cavalry would be kept on the extreme flanks, and a thin line of velites and leves would launch pila before any infantry engagement. That being said, when the Marian reforms occurred, standardization of equipment became a big aspect of that. With that however you lost the layers of experience. So what would the Romans have done as a standard pre-battle formation after that?
1 Answers 2015-07-25
4 Answers 2015-07-25