I've heard the story that the soviets were kicking US butt until about 1967 when the US blew past them with the help of Gemini rockets. Soviets couldn't compete.
US landed on the moon. Won the race. End of story.
Except...
I've also heard that the Soviets had half the budget of the US, and weren't even trying to put a man on the moon. They opted for a space station, and were the first country to do that...which we never learn about, of course.
Current Space exploration is based on satellites and manning space stations, not putting people on planets.
Were the Soviets smarter (and more efficient) in their approach? And did the US "win" if winning is defined by a goal that the Soviets were not even trying to achieve? A goal that ended up not being as important, technologically speaking, as the Soviet goal?
1 Answers 2015-05-22
Genuine question that I can't find anywhere! I tried to Google it but found a few odd articles.
3 Answers 2015-05-22
Says a name (Bruce Middlebrook) and 1905, P.A. on leather inner liner that fell out.
Bill is hard, material feels like suede(ish)?
Button (on each side) has eagle on it.
Has stamp on inside.
http://imgur.com/gallery/v6PMD
Looking for any information on it really.
2 Answers 2015-05-22
If so, to what degree were dogs (or other pets) considered family? Could they inherit land? If a king's family died, leaving only their pet, was it possible for them to inherit the throne?
1 Answers 2015-05-22
1 Answers 2015-05-22
Was there ever an attempt by African-Americans to reinvigorate the use of their ancestor's native tongues among communities in the United States? If so, why was their attempt a success or a failure? If not, has the topic ever been discussed seriously?
2 Answers 2015-05-22
As the title says. I've been fascinated by the city ever since first hearing about it on Mike Duncan's "The History of Rome." Is there a definitive book about the city's history?
1 Answers 2015-05-22
In the book she makes many claims about changes in the ways things women were socialized between the 30s and 50s. She makes claims about changes in the way advertisers portrayed women and changes in the way women were taught to think about careers. I often wonder if this has been scrutinized heavily and if it has (from a historical perspective) what the conclusions of that scrutiny were?
I don't have an intuition about whether she is right or wrong, but I do know that people often have nostalgia for times past as a 'golden age'.
I'm asking this question here because I'm writing an academic paper that is (only tangentially) related to this book and was wondering what people on this sub thought of her. This might seem a question better for /r/AskSocialScience, but I feel more comfortable that this sub will provide better answers as well as answers to specific historical claims.
Also, here's a wiki link to the page on this book, which summarizes here major claims.
1 Answers 2015-05-22
1 Answers 2015-05-22
I know she was widely considered a virgin queen during her reign however several of my lecturers in Uni have seemed to suggest that she wasn't infact a virgin and actually quite promiscuous.
Is there any evidence confirming this? If so why was she so widely considered a virgin at the time?
1 Answers 2015-05-22
I know that Desi Arnaz's family was well-off and fled due to the Cuban Revolution, so he's not exactly likely to be sympathetic. But it seems as though the average viewer might not know this. It's quite easy for misinformation to circulate and I'm surprised that there doesn't seem to be any evidence of xenophobia.
Was there never any accusations or protests?
It also strikes me as interesting that in I Love Lucy, they repeatedly reference Ricky's family in Cuba and Ricky being from Cuba. There's even a scene where Ricky buys a "Havana University" pennant for little Ricky. It seems like they deliberately played it up, rather than just having Ricky be ambigiously Hispanic.
1 Answers 2015-05-22
1 Answers 2015-05-22
The AskHistorians Podcast is a project that highlights the users and answers that have helped make /r/AskHistorians one of the largest history discussion forum on the internet. You can subscribe to us via iTunes, Stitcher, or RSS, and now on YouTube. You can also catch the latest episodes on SoundCloud. If there is another index you'd like the cast listed on, let me know!
This Episode:
/u/DonaldFDraper drops in to give a broad overview of how European politics and military tactics changed in the extended century running from the end of the 30 Years War up into the ascent Napoleon. Starting with Gustavus Adolphus, the development of line infantry, and the resuscitation of cavalry tactics, the episode progresses there into the War of Spanish Succession and the dynastic gamesmanship that dictated the pace of war and peace. The episode proceeds from there into the War of Austrian Succession, the rise of Prussia, the Diplomatic Revolution, the Seven Years War, new artillery tactics, and the relative merits of muskets vs. rifles.
If you want more specific recommendations for sources or have any follow-up questions, feel free to ask them here! Also feel free to leave any feedback on the format and so on.
If you like the podcast, please rate and review us on iTunes.
Thanks all!
Coming up next fortnight: /u/RioAbajo discusses the 1680 Pueblo Revolt, wherein the Pueblo in what is now New Mexico expelled the Spanish colonizers from the region.
5 Answers 2015-05-22
1 Answers 2015-05-22
Today:
You know the drill: this is the thread for all your history-related outpourings that are not necessarily questions. Minor questions that you feel don't need or merit their own threads are welcome too. Discovered a great new book, documentary, article or blog? Has your Ph.D. application been successful? Have you made an archaeological discovery in your back yard? Did you find an anecdote about the Doge of Venice telling a joke to Michel Foucault? Tell us all about it.
As usual, moderation in this thread will be relatively non-existent -- jokes, anecdotes and light-hearted banter are welcome.
17 Answers 2015-05-22
21 Answers 2015-05-22
I get the sense that the concept of "Turkish" changed from culture to culture, and maybe lacked a certain coherence or concreteness.
Who considered themselves Turkish? Did they hold multiple identities, and, if so, how important was the Turkish component to this identity?
Did the Ottomans consider themselves or the people they ruled to be Turkish? If no, how did they conceive of themselves and the peoples they ruled?
Did Iranians make a meaningful distinction between Turkish and Mongol? I read some of the works of Ubayd Zakani, and Turks often feature in anecdotes that involve murder and rape. Were Turks widely seen as violent?
Who did Europeans consider Turkish? Did eastern and western Europeans conceptions of Turkishness agree?
1 Answers 2015-05-22
2 Answers 2015-05-22
1 Answers 2015-05-22
1 Answers 2015-05-22