I realize this question seems semi-history and semi-contemporary but I am more interested in the historical side of things and how that has impacted their current status.
Scotland just implemented a vote for independence, it was shot down by voters but it was still voted upon. I'm wondering why something similar has not happened with Northern Ireland. What's stopping them? What has stopped them historically? The history of aggression from the IRA? Or have more North Irish support the UK than it would seem?
2 Answers 2015-04-08
1 Answers 2015-04-08
My U.S. History course is about to begin studying the Cold War. Being a U.S. History course, of course, we're going to be viewing the Cold War from the United States' perspective, both at home and in general. Being born and raised in the States, this is also the perspective I've been exposed to all my life. I'm curious how it compares to the Russian point of view.
EDIT: At the suggestion of /u/kikool42 I have crossposted this question to /r/russia.
7 Answers 2015-04-08
I was watching black sails and it's a big part of pirate culture in the fictive Nassau. I was wondering what prostitution really was like.
1 Answers 2015-04-08
1 Answers 2015-04-08
I’ve been researching Italy’s transition from the Fall of Rome to becoming a part of the Holy Roman Empire and I came across the hypothesis that the Iron Crown of the Lombards was already used in the coronation of Charlemagne as King of Italy. The first definite use we know of was Conrad III in 1128, but it might have been used earlier. The last instance was Ferdinand of Austria in 1838.
At first it seemed like this might be a relatively long time period, but after some thinking I realised there are others that have been used over the same, if not longer, periods. What’s your candidate for longest used crown?
1 Answers 2015-04-08
1 Answers 2015-04-08
Like the title says, I am looking for sources on letters. I am mostly interested in comparing what used to be written to what is written today (for example with e-mails and instant messaging taking over the function of the letter). I am also interested in the differences in how letters were written in the past vs now. Could you point me to some useful, but low level (high school) sources?
I need to write a short paper (2-4 pages) on the letter and I plan on focussing on developments in the history of the letter. It is quite obvious that the letters Plinius and Cicero wrote were very different from the letters that are written today and that the letter has lost a lot of popularity, as people prefer using faster, easier and more casual forms of communication (e-mails, texts, phone, instant messaging). But I don't know enough about the subject to write anything meaningful on it, which is why I'm looking for sources to get started. Any suggestions? Please keep in mind that I'm still in high school, so many sources might be a bit too advanced for me. Also, I'm Dutch and don't have access to a lot of books, so I would prefer websites as sources. If you have interesting ideas to share about (the history of) letters, please post them as well!
1 Answers 2015-04-08
1 Answers 2015-04-08
3 Answers 2015-04-08
I've been reading up a bit on trade in Mesoamerica, and it seems like there's a lot of information about long-distance trade of luxury goods (exotic feathers, jade, obsidian, cacao beans). What about non-luxury goods? Do we know anything about smaller networks moving lower-value items?
Most of what I've read has been talking about the Aztecs and Maya in classic and post-classic Mesoamerica, but if anybody wants to talk about an earlier time period or a different culture, I'm happy to learn new things. (Also, I'm a sucker for maps of trade routes, if you have any.)
1 Answers 2015-04-08
1 Answers 2015-04-08
Edit: made, not make.
1 Answers 2015-04-08
I was reading through the ESPY file which is a record of all recorded executions in the US since 1608. I noticed about 30 people were executed in horrific ways as punishment for a slave revolt. Does anybody know the story?
1 Answers 2015-04-08
1 Answers 2015-04-08
I've ran into it comment flame wars on /r/history before in my own posts about Alexander the Great.
Greece is Greece, that part is easily understood in itself.
Apparently something went down in 1913 and some split happened that left would be Macedonians a little irked.
What I don't get is Macedonia was considered separate pre Alexander the Great and something the Greeks didn't like being under when Alexander took the reigns of Greece.
After Alexander's Death, there was a push against Macedonia. Eventually, Macedonia was segmented away and dissolved/split up by Rome after the Macedonian Wars (poor Perseus should have killed himself).
What makes it more interesting, is Alexander I of Macedon (not the Great) had to prove his Greek heritage to participate in one of the early Olympics. I don't know how much this is factor in the discussion. Seems like appealing to Homer's Illiad(?) isn't the most thorough treatment of lineage (reminds me of Rome's The Aeneid).
So what I'm seeing here, is some sort of pro Greek state that has been historically recognized as at least a close cousin to Greece since ancient times, but while under Alexander the Great, there was some sort of tension during his reign and today there is some issues with identifying Macedonia as it's own state today vs just as a part of Greece.
Honestly, I don't see the drama since it appears historically, there was just as much animosity as recognizing Macedon as a part of Greece.
By the far, the most impressive thing about Macedon was there good taste in court physicians. ;)
1 Answers 2015-04-08
2 Answers 2015-04-08
1 Answers 2015-04-08
1 Answers 2015-04-08
1 Answers 2015-04-08
I find it particularly interesting because the Iron Guard was one of only three Fascist political parties to come to power organically (elected to parliament), yet they are either not included or mentioned only briefly in comparative studies of Fascism. Why?
In an attempt to answer my own question, i think its because the Iron Guard do not fit the traditional Fascist model (Paxton "Anatomy of fascism"/Payne "Fascism: comparison and definition". The iron guard were a fanatically religious organization (eastern orthodox), membership was mostly drawn from university students differed radically from Mussolini's Fascism or Hitlers Nazism. Secondly, it may be that the certain archival material has just recently become available due to the soviet iron curtain.
For people who have no idea who the iron guard is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_Guard
1 Answers 2015-04-08
What happens to Catholicism at the time of the reformation in Scandinavia, and why does it seem to just disappear? Compared to say a country like England, which became Protestant, yet still had a Catholic presence with some people and political figures remaining Catholic.
1 Answers 2015-04-08