As in the Battle of Agincourt, where about a thousand French nobles died.
2 Answers 2015-03-13
-Walter Bagehot
.
I know about George III, but what about the other kings and queens, grand-dukes, emperors and tsars of Europe and the wider world? What insanities or eccentricities did they have to inspire Bagehot to write that line?
3 Answers 2015-03-13
So far the only answer (with a source) I've found was [this] (http://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/2164db/when_and_why_did_fish_become_allowed_on_fridays/cga2udx).
However, I remember learning at the Catholic High School I went to that the historical/cultural reasoning behind it was to be "clean" for Lent. Pigs and cattle were raised in unsanitary pastures and were very bloody when being butchered for meat and those were deemed unclean for the body. However, fish were seen as clean being they came from the water and aren't as bloody while being prepared for consumption.
Two other common things I've heard are (and these usually don't have a source when being said):
*Disclaimer, I was born a raised Catholic for 18 years of my 20 year life, and went to Catholic elementary and high school for a total of 12 years. However, for the past 2 years I've considered myself an empirical agnostic.
I'm this asking question because I was trying to debate with my mother that eating deep fried fish for Lent seems counter-intuitive considering how it's bad for the body in general (especially McDonald's fried fish filet sandwich). I couldn't find many sources that explain the root historical meaning to who first created these rules (and I would assume the answer would lie somewhere in the New Testament, so I would appreciate it if a Theologian could chime in on this). Thanks again for all the help and info!
2 Answers 2015-03-13
Canada's participation in WWI occurred during a tumultuous time in its history, with industrialization rapidly changing cities, and in an atmosphere of social reform.
Could you consider World War One a watershed event in the history of Canada? Did its participation in the War lead to significant change, and if so, how?
1 Answers 2015-03-13
2 Answers 2015-03-13
Edit: As some comments have noted, this isn't a worldwide truism. My specific experience and question are pertaining to in the U.S.
2 Answers 2015-03-13
1 Answers 2015-03-13
1 Answers 2015-03-13
So the Wikipedia article on the Sandinistas is somewhat, should I say,...hagiographic. Can somebody mention some of the downsides of Sandinista rule in Nicaragua? Was Nicaragua really a socialist utopia, and were the Sandinistas really as democratic as is portrayed in this Wikipedia article, or was Nicaragua more like present-day Venezuela?
1 Answers 2015-03-13
1 Answers 2015-03-13
If so, what?
1 Answers 2015-03-13
Thank you, guys!
1 Answers 2015-03-13
Trying to search for such information usually gets me onto Anti-Semitic websites. I can't even find information about the supposedly Polish government examination of the chamber without finding myself on StormFront or another websites.
3 Answers 2015-03-13
You always hear about the mafia's exploits in places like New York, Chicago, and Las Vegas to name a few, but not else where. Is that because the other cities where some how able to prevent their entry into the city, or just movies aren't fun to shoot in Cincinnati?
1 Answers 2015-03-13
To clarify, I'm wondering not just on the general consensus, but about the extra room that opened up, what happened to the jobs people left behind, the food stores, things like that.
I'm guessing many criminals headed west to escape prosecution, so how did the eastern law men deal with that? Was it just putting out bounties, or was there some other process?
2 Answers 2015-03-13
1 Answers 2015-03-13
My friend and I are having a debate on why Soviet citizens would have joined the army of WWII era Russia. I thought that they would have to be threatened with the gulag, but she believes that they thought that the army wasn't as bad as it was and would have been desirable to join. Who's right?
1 Answers 2015-03-13
1 Answers 2015-03-13
The title is a line from the 1968 Rolling Stones song Sympathy for the Devil. The song references different historical events which are allegedly done in collusion with Satan, the singer.
This is the only line in the song which I cannot place in any sort of context. Do any historians have a clue what event this may refer to?
1 Answers 2015-03-13
I'm looking for some good books about partisan warfare during the Second World War, specifically on the Eastern Front. I didn't see anything on the book list, but I could have missed it.
1 Answers 2015-03-13
1 Answers 2015-03-13