I saw this post on tumblr, stating that Nazi uniforms were extremely impractical, and failed in multiple ways. So I tried looking up the specific claims, but all I could find was that the uniforms did have an internal suspension system, and the winter uniforms were insufficient for Russian winter. Does anyone know enough about Nazi uniforms to address the rest of it? It just seems that, if this were true, it would be more widely known.
For those who don't want to click the link:
Let me give you an example: suspenders. Back in the 1930s, the modern tactical harness hadn’t yet been developed. Instead, soldiers would wear a sturdy pair of leather suspenders in order to help distribute the weight of their ammo belts (which could be substantial - bullets aren’t light!). Hitler didn’t care for that - he thought it would make his troops look like farmers. Instead, he commissioned his uniform designers to come up with a complicated system of internal suspenders that could be worn under the uniform jacket, with metal hooks projecting from special holes near the jacket’s waistline. The idea was that the ammo belt would rest on the hooks, thus allowing it to be supported without disrupting the jacket’s clean lines.
The problem? The system’s designers, being accustomed to crafting for the runway, had completely overlooked that soldiers sometimes need to move quickly. At any pace quicker than a brisk walk, the ammo belt would bounce off of the hooks and slide down the wearer’s torso, often tripping him in the process. Worse, news of the issue didn’t filter back to the high command until the uniforms had already been widely distributed, so it was impossible to fix in an economical fashion. The Nazi troops eventually resorted to wearing external suspenders over the internal suspenders in order to keep their ammo belts in place, thus entirely defeating the purpose.
Then there are the cold-weather jackets, made infamous by the Nazis’ disastrous Winter Campaign against Russia in 1941-1942. At the time, the standard cold-weather jacket in use by most armies consisted of heavy quilted fabric stuffed with torn-up cotton. Hitler didn’t like that at all; in his opinion, it made it look like his troops were wearing blankets. So he had each soldier issued an individually tailored winter jacket made of suit-grade fabric and lined with fur (sourced from civilian clothing seized from death camp inmates, because of course it was).
You can probably guess where this is going. Predictably to anyone who’s not a Nazi fashion designer, the fine fabric of the jackets wasn’t tightly woven enough to stop the wind. The fur, meanwhile, harboured lice and fleas, stank abominably when wet, and was impossible to launder in the field. They’d managed to issue their troops dry clean only winter apparel, in a campaign that would send them far from their supply lines. That the weather ended up killing more Nazis than the Russian army should thus come as no surprise.
And these aren’t outliers. Virtually every element of the Nazi uniform made up for its smart styling by being ridiculously impractical. The officers often had it worst of all; their uniforms were expertly tailored to make their builds look trim and powerful, at the cost of being stuffy, uncomfortable, and difficult to move around it. Indeed, some officers’ uniforms were so smartly tailored that they couldn’t sit down without taking their pants off. Yeah, let that image roll around in your head for a moment or two.
1 Answers 2015-02-28
2 Answers 2015-02-28
Today:
Saturday Reading and Research will focus on exactly that: the history you have been reading this week and the research you've been working on. It's also the prime thread for requesting books on a particular subject. As with all our weekly features, this thread will be lightly moderated.
So, encountered a recent biography of Stalin that revealed all about his addiction to ragtime piano? Delved into a horrendous piece of presentist and sexist psycho-evolutionary mumbo-jumbo and want to tell us about how bad it was? Need help finding the right book to give the historian in your family? Then this is the thread for you!
9 Answers 2015-02-28
2 Answers 2015-02-28
1 Answers 2015-02-28
Beating kids seemed to work out fine for thousands of years then in some parts of the world in less than a human lifetime its become a great taboo. What was the cause of this?
1 Answers 2015-02-28
There's no shortage of sources regarding Hitler's use of pharmaceuticals, by the end he was a poster child of amphetamine psychosis. Does anyone know how the man got started up?
3 Answers 2015-02-28
As in it was illegal to associate with Jews, etc. If not, are there any other examples of anti-association laws post 1800?
1 Answers 2015-02-28
Preferably West Africa but not essential. I'm looking for an understanding of the changes that went on due to colonialism and the knock on effects resulting in the subsaharan Africa of today. I'm not a history student or experienced in reading historical texts so perhaps recommend more accessible texts.
1 Answers 2015-02-28
1 Answers 2015-02-28
Not only that but how did the French people feel about him after his coronation? They went from the Directors, to the Consuls to a full blown Emperor leading them before the Coalition wars. There had to have been some problems right?
2 Answers 2015-02-28
1 Answers 2015-02-28
I recently read somewhere that the USA joined WWI on the side of the allies due to the large sum of cash which the aforementioned countries owed to the US. How legitimate are these claims? How much? Did the Axis owe the US anything?
1 Answers 2015-02-28
I read(Lone Star: A History of Texas) that at one point possibly Texas almost annexed California &/or Oregon.
2 Answers 2015-02-28
I have a vague understanding from a few Google searches, but I was wondering if there was any good reading material for this because the Korean War really interests me.
1 Answers 2015-02-28
Hoping this question pertains to historiography and so ignores the 20 year rule.
A lot of history is pulled from people who lived the events and their diaries or letters. How important will stuff like this be for future historians? Will e-mails from average, every day citizens be that important? Or diaries or text messages, etc? Or are we so well-documented at large that these smaller primary samples will not be so important?
1 Answers 2015-02-28
1 Answers 2015-02-28
1 Answers 2015-02-28
I'm not super interested in one that focuses just on the Nazis / concentration camps, since I feel like I've seen a hundred of those. I'm more interested in the forming of alliances, causes for war, specific battles and outcome.
I became interested after seeing this channel called The Great War which is supposedly going a 4 year long recap of WWI week by week, but I'm just more interested in learning about WWII. Maybe because it was more recent, or maybe because America was more involved.
Thanks!
4 Answers 2015-02-28