Was it done with a file or other device?

I've just graduated high school and have still not been taught any of those aforementioned topics which kinda saddens me.

I'd prefer something online, but am open to all suggestions.

Edit - Oh yea, and I haven't even learned about the USSR.

Edit 2 - I'd also like to learn about the Mongol Empire and how it turned into Russia. And also Chinese kingdoms history.

How did native cultures in the Americas treat one another after some were pushed off of their land and into the land of the other?

Were they generally accepted, treated suspiciously, or refused?

It seems that every European kingdom considered itself to be the heir to Rome. The Holy Roman Empire considered itself a successor state, various Slavic rulers went by "Czar," the Ottomans termed themselves "Sultan of Rum," and even today Romania considers itself a successor.

Were there similar things going on elsewhere in the world?

Why didn't the US civil war get as bogged down and stalemated as WW1? Was it for technological reasons, such as how good the rifles were or how well armed people were? Or due to the much bigger armies? Or that there was always a flank to turn in the US civil war? Or something else i'm not thinking of?

For instance, following the mining disaster in Turkey there appears to have been a massive backlash with violent protests. In Greece, there were violent protests that have extended longs periods of time. There are lots of examples of this in recent memory however it seems as though the United States has been exempt from much of this unrest. Is there a historical foundation to these issues today? What modern factors contribute to this? Is it simply a bias on my part?

Fairly self explanatory. Wikipedia doesn't seem to be of much help.

People constantly criticize Wikipedia for being an unreliable source of information. Despite this, many people trust it as a go-to knowledge base. Is there a genuine risk that widespread use of Wikipedia could dilute or skew our record of history?

Or is it all theory? Did any infamous Nazis never get hunted down and prosecuted?

Stories of the infamous Templar navy are abound, we hear that they sailed away with fabulous treasure. However, I can't seem to find anything on their actual naval capability. Can someone please provide some information on the naval capabilities of the Templars (as much as you're willing to share, I realize they were around for centuries)? I can't seem to get beyond the white noise and conspiracy theories. I would also be interested in the naval capabilities of the medieval Knights Hospitaller and Teutonic Knights.

If you would be willing to provide some direction of further reading I would also be appreciative. This is not for a project, I am just interested in the history (not conspiracy).

I've often heard that so much of the conflict in the middle east and Africa is due to the way the boundaries were drawn after WWI and WWII, with a "colonial" focus, (ie the the oil companies only wanted to negotiate with one country rather than several "groups"). Is this correct? Were there other reasons at the time for drawing the boundaries the way they did? Did any corporations or individuals have any say in this? Should people have known how badly this would turn out?

Most literature of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is written within the paradigm of the wider conflict that stretches to the present-day, but they often don't really focus on how Jews and Palestinians lived together in the Land of Israel/Land of Palestine before the major troubles of 1936-1948 (Palestinian Intifada to the Arab-Israeli War).

So I was wondering if any of you know any first-hand accounts by Jews or Palestinians, chronicling the events as they were unfolding themselves. Because I'm sure those would describe daily interactions between Jews and Palestinians. Biographies published before 1948 would also be interesting. Do these exist? I don't speak Arabic or Hebrew so that's a bit of a language barrier there, but English, French or Dutch would be okay. Thank you!

I first heard of this theory from a Cracked article that mentioned cocaine and tobacco (which are New World plants) found in a pharaoh's tomb. Apparently there's lots of connections between the Aztecs and Egyptians, including that they both made pyramids, used hieroglyphics, and had similar religious beliefs. Now, I don't believe that Egyptians actually sailed to the New World (there's no records of it anywhere in Egypt, or in Mexico), but I was wondering why some historians believe that, or why that theory emerged.