For those who don't know, Drunk History is a TV show on Comedy Central in which fairly famous actors reenact the drunk narrations of historical events. Here's Comedy Centrals blurb about it:
"Drunk History is a weekly, half-hour series where historical reenactments by A-list talent are presented by inebriated storytellers. Based on the award-winning and wildly popular web series, the show follows the drunken and often incoherent narration of our nation's history. Host Derek Waters, along with an ever-changing cast of great actors and comedians, travels from town to town across the country, presenting the rich history that every city in this land, both great and small, has to offer. Booze helps bring out the truth of our nation's history. It's just that sometimes that truth involves hitting on airport bar janitors or eating cheese fries at 4 a.m."
I only recently started watching the show and I've become a huge fan from the few episode I've watched and would love to see a thread covering the history discussed in the new episodes.
The show appears to try to be as accurate as possible. However, because the narrators are drunk and only tell a abridged version of events, I think weekly threads would be great for non-historians to ask for elaborations, clarifications, or confirmations on the facts given on the show. Historians can also chime in to clarify facts they feel where misrepresented during the show.
The next season begins on Tuesday June 24th at 10pm
3 Answers 2014-03-19
2 Answers 2014-03-19
Between 1930 and 1990
1 Answers 2014-03-19
Take English, how far back would I able to go and understand English, or say German with a modern ear? Were languages still regional up until the time of say, radio? If I went back to the time of Alfred the Great what language was the common tongue?
2 Answers 2014-03-19
I don't mean to use you guys as a lookit service, but i'm sort of at a loss. Looking through some old Soviet pins, most probably from the cold war era, perhaps a little before that, when I came across this guy.
http://imgur.com/gsrUART,6fUnnS7
I'm no eurasian history scholar, but it looks like this could be a pin dealing with Russia - Ukrainian relations from a very different time, and in light of current events, I wanted to see if anyone could possibly identify the pins origins, or maybe even just translate the letters on top.
Thanks in advance!
2 Answers 2014-03-18
I know that the Mormon church was founded after Joseph Smith claimed to have a vision sent from God, but this is the only American event that I know of that involved a specific religious vision. How seriously did Americans take these stories of divine revelation? Today we consider most people mentally ill if they start sharing these stories. Have Americans always been skeptical of the validity of a religious vision? If a person claimed to have had a religious vision, what would be the consequences? What were the most fertile periods for people claiming to have had religious visions?
1 Answers 2014-03-18
3 Answers 2014-03-18
e.g. I was reading this article
http://www.filmsforaction.org/kolkata/news/fdi_in_retail_who_will_it_hurt_the_most/
As often happened in those times, the Portuguese attacked, looted and set fire to the town of Calicut. The Mappila community lost the spice trade — and a whole lot more — that they had carefully built over centuries to the invaders.
Why?
Couldn't the invaders have also made use of it? Even Genghis Khan or Mahmud Ghazni, other Muslim invaders into India e.g. Were they the consequence of one-sided aggression? Why did they decide to attack a totally peaceful colony?
In another sense, isn't it such a risky exercise? Is it just materialistic greed? If that is the case, how can European invaders be blamed for wipeout of Indigenous tribes in America and Australia? Isn't this a natural way of life?
In the same way, are we affording to much respect to smaller tribal settlements when we need to expand to satisfy the 'greed' of a technologically advanced populace?
It's a very vast question, but I believe the motivations are essentially connected.
1 Answers 2014-03-18
A recent article pointed out that Crimea should return to Turkey if it declared independence.
What were the circumstances surrounding this agreement?
If Turkey were to make a claim on Crimea today, why would it be/not be a legitimate claim?
If Crimea declared independence during the time of Catherine the Great, how did the Ottaman Empire plan to enforce the relevant portions of this agreement?
1 Answers 2014-03-18
Why aren't Christians still debating the nature of Christ, and why did this theological debate not cause schisms in the Western church like it did in the Byzantine Empire?
1 Answers 2014-03-18
It seems to me that Noah's Ark when depicted via image has a distinct look: The big bulbous-looking boat with the door on the side and a 'house' on the deck seen here. Where did this depiction come from?
1 Answers 2014-03-18
Some films show a large formation of soldiers charging toward the enemy formation, and then the soldiers at the front fight while the ones behind can't even reach the enemy. Other films show hundreds of individual fights with two or three combatants who largely ignore what is happening around them.
So which is more accurate when compared to actual medieval battles? Or did it just differ depending on the situation / terrain / leadership?
2 Answers 2014-03-18
Over in in /r/worldnews there is an article reporting that this treaty exists.
http://www.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/20qpy7/turkey_under_ottoman_empire_treaty_with_catherine/
It gives no name, just that it was signed 230 years ago. If it exists, is it in anyway enforceable or is it merely a curiosity?
3 Answers 2014-03-18
Relative to the modern calendar. For instance, do we know exactly when Caesar was killed? Is there anything from hundreds of years before then that we can put a precise date on?
To be clear, it's not enough to merely label the event with a date, because I understand there have been irregularities in the convention. I want to know what is the earliest significant date for which we could, in principle, count out exactly how many days ago it was from right now.
Does the answer change if we lower our precision to just the season and year?
(Edit: I feel silly for my Caesar example, as I just remembered the "ides of March". Still, has the calendar remained consistent over that time span to the point that we can figure out when it was?)
1 Answers 2014-03-18
1 Answers 2014-03-18
I was wondering whether Ukraine had distinct borders before 1918 and if it did not, how did the borders during the USSR period were determined
1 Answers 2014-03-18
Like the Ottoman Empire treaty with Catherine the Great.
1 Answers 2014-03-18
1 Answers 2014-03-18
Many different theories have been brought up on the aftermath of Jesus' body including the most famous resurrection story. For the historians that believe Jesus existed, what do you think happened to his body and what historical evidence do you have to support this? Is this theory held by most historians? If so, what theory is and why?
Also as a side question, what do historians think of books by apologists on this subject such as Lee Strobel's A Case For Christ (probably not the best example but I hear of it a lot from Christians)?
Edit: I honestly don't know the answer to this. People asked for information on the historical Jesus but not about the location of his body. I have no knowledge in this issue and want to learn. Please don't down vote so much. If this has been brought up, please post a link.
1 Answers 2014-03-18
I was watching an old film from 1955, a "What in the World" episode from the University of Pennsylvania's Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology (some of you may find it interesting!). I couldn't help but notice all the little "defects" in the image, such as the blurring, lack of contrast, specks, lines, etc. How many of those defects are due to the film itself deteriorating over time?
Additionally, has anyone replicated and used 1950s or 1940s filming equipment today? Does anyone know what those results looked like?
4 Answers 2014-03-18
1 Answers 2014-03-18
Hi, I've been reading in christian apologetics texts about judeo- christian tradition of European and American culture. (Politicans also like to use it.) But the same apologicians (?) say that Christianity is so different from Judaism, mainly the idea of a Messiah, and also the Law and such. But today, we always hear about judeo-christian tradition. I would like to know when this term came to use and why. Is it because post-holocaust trauma, that we have to acknowledge Jews as part of European history, which to me seems pretty inadequate as the Jews were, and still are, just a minority among plenty other cultures. Or to what extent is this term justifiable? Thank you, and I'm very sorry for my bad english, which constrains me from stating my questions properly.
1 Answers 2014-03-18