As someone of partly Jewish ancestry I'm trying to understand their thinking behind starting the Holocaust while preparing/fighting a war. Why on earth would they waste all those resources on that when they could gone to better use helping the war effort? Why not postpone it until after winning? From most accounts it seems like the Germans had many of the best strategists of the day, but it just seems like they squandered it all. Were they that blinded by discrimination that they threw self-preservation out the window? They had to have known how much manpower and money they were wasting doing it.

Are there any historical reports of what happened to the fish?

What percentage of the whole population was this? Cant seem to find a solid estimate. Wikipedia says about 23 million but my teacher thinks it is much higher than that.

I was considering the desperate need for manpower that many nations in WW2 ran into, and it made me wonder, what were the differences between physical standards in the different nation's armed forces? For instance, did the Soviet have lower standards for weight because their population might not have been as well fed? Moreover, how did the various nations qualifications change during the war? I know that by the end of the war, the Germans were throwing teenagers and middle aged men into the war, how about the other powers? After the German advance into Russia was repelled, were certain groups less likely to be called up?

Saying just “Netherlands” or “Philippines” is grammatically incorrect and sounds off. Is it like this in other languages as well?

So I was recently reading about the surprising and absurd instance of 1979 when French commandos had to briefly convert to Islam to be allowed into the holy city of Mecca in order to relieve its siege by al ikhwan extremists on behalf of the Saudi government. My question is why did the Saudi government resort to this? Surely it would be a massive PR failure for the Saudis and the broader Arab and Islamic worlds, to be seen relying on a former imperialist western power to protect their cultural heritage? Furthermore, why the French? From my own knowledge before the Saudis Mecca was traditionally in the British and ottoman Spheres of influence. It has no historical connection to France and France has little military presence there.

Although I realize the Anglo-Saxon migration is a much debated/controversial topic, I was just wondering if there is any consensus on this particular aspect of Gildas' account.

I know that the general claim is "the path of the bullet that hit Kennedy is physically impossible, so there must have been a second gunman" and I know that the consensus is that this claim is wrong, but that's just about all I know.

I was thinking that ancient Egypt was a ‘thing’ for like 3000 years and was wondering whether they had any major scientific or technological advancements because our civilisation has been for around that long and we’ve done loads of stuff

Sorry for the really bad wording lol

[deleted]

This is also to some extent true with the Hebrew Bible, even in the most up-to-date modern translations.

An example from the Kadesh inscriptions translated by Alan Gardiner in 1960:

Then did My Majesty desist in life and dominion, being like Mont at his moment when his attack has succeeded. Then My Majesty caused to be brought to me all the leaders of my infantry and my chariotry and all my high officers collected in one place, to cause them to hear the matter concerning which he had written. Then My Majesty caused them to hear these words which the wretched Chief of Khatti had written to me. Thereupon they said with one voice 'Exceeding good is peace, O Sovereign our Lord. There is no blame in reconciliation when thou makest it, for who shall withstand thee on the day of thy wrath?'

From the Book of the Dead translated by E. A. Wallis Budge in 1899:

Homage to thee, O Ra, when thou risest as Tem-Heru-khuti. Thou art adored by me when thy beauties are before mine eyes, and when when thy radiance falleth upon my body. Thou goest forth to thy setting in the Sektet boat with fair winds, and thy heart is glad; the heart of the Matet boat rejoiceth. Thou stridest over the heavens in peace, and all thy foes are cast down; the never resting stars sing hymns of praise unto thee, and the stars which rest, and the stars which never fail glorify thee as thou sinkest to rest in the horizon of Manu, O thou who art beautiful at morn and at eve, O thou lord who livest and art established, O my lord!

Also what was the reason for the excessively long and weird royal titulary like this:

Majesty of the Residence of Re-Harakhti The-Strong-Bull-beloved-of-Truth, sovereign who protects his army, mighty on account of his strong arm, a wall for his soldiers on the day of fighting, the King of Upper and Lower Egypt Usima-re-setpenre, the Son of Re, lion lord of the strong arm Ramses-miamun, given life eternally.

Are they worth buying? Is the historical info reliable? How accurate are the illustrations?

[deleted]

So are historians a self employed job who go and discover new things about history and write books about it or do they sign up with like a company and they fly them out to an area to discover and learn about undiscovered history. Sorry if I sound dumb asking this but I really want to know because I have been having it on my mind to be one but I am not really sure how it works.