I understand how modern day ships can find each other with things like radar, but back in the 17-1800s, how did boats find each other in the middle of places like the Atlantic Ocean or the Caribbean sea?
1 Answers 2017-05-23
Doing an essay on this for History, the main debate of this question is whether the Marshall Plan was more politically motivated rather then economically motivated. Any sources, facts and books to help with this? Any help is appreciated thank you!
3 Answers 2017-05-23
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haber_process
Due to its dramatic impact on the human ability to grow food, the Haber process served as the "detonator of the population explosion", enabling the global population to increase from 1.6 billion in 1900 to today's 7 billion.[20] Nearly 80% of the nitrogen found in human tissues originated from the Haber-Bosch process.[21]
1 Answers 2017-05-23
I am conducting a 2000 word research project into the differing analyses regarding the bombings of Hiroshima and to an, to a lesser extent, Nagasaki. I'm after historians and their personal contexts and how these have influenced their history's they presented. I'm not sure how I plan on going about this so I am after ways in which to go about answering the question, especially the historians involved.
1 Answers 2017-05-23
I am writing a paper on Youth Politics in Australia but before that I wish to gain a better understanding of the ideological positions and history of Australia's major parties and/or other significant players. Any more general histories of Australia's politics you could recommend for the late 20th century?
1 Answers 2017-05-23
For example, such as making the conflict global instead of local, basically, would it have been confined it to the European theater between the main belligerents if they stayed out of it?
No need to focus solely on the example given above.
2 Answers 2017-05-23
The days of the week are in english (and other languages, like german) a very old reminder of the pagan roots of these cultures. Has anyone ever tried to "modernize" the terms?
2 Answers 2017-05-23
2 Answers 2017-05-23
1 Answers 2017-05-23
This question is a bit different from the rest so I hope it won't get removed, but anyways. To sum it up, I am a huge fan of history and it is a dream of mine to read one day an authentic historical text written by a great historical figure. Not a copy, not a photo of it, but actually have in front of me the original. However, I am only an amateur and have no professional excuse to be able to read it, hence my question, where and how can an amateur, an everyday Joe if you will, be able to do such a thing?
1 Answers 2017-05-23
1 Answers 2017-05-23
1 Answers 2017-05-23
In Gerald Ford's eulogy, Henry Kissinger said:
According to an ancient tradition, God preserves humanity despite its many transgressions because, at any one period, there exist ten just individuals who redeem mankind, without being aware of their role.
Which is this ancient tradition and is there any context why this particular reference was chosen to praise the dead president?
1 Answers 2017-05-23
I've heard that the Greeks didn't believe their gods were actually literal people. It was explained to me that, for example, during a storm at sea, when the sailors said Poseidon was angry at them, they didn't actually believe there was an angry guy with a trident somewhere causing that storm. Rather that the sea was Poseidon. This is just something I was told, so, if someone could tell me how accurate or innacurate this is, as well as maybe how the greek saw their pantheon, it would be great.
3 Answers 2017-05-23
1 Answers 2017-05-22
6 Answers 2017-05-22
How reliable are the sources and evidence presented? Should it be taken seriously at all, or can it be dismissed as propaganda?
Thank you.
2 Answers 2017-05-22
1 Answers 2017-05-22
1 Answers 2017-05-22
In recent years, there have been many issues where the public has debated on if an idea is credible science or pseudo-science. To keep this politically neutral I won't list any of the present issues, but we should have at least heard of them.
However, when PTSD was officially recognized as mental disorder by the American Psychiatric Association in 1980, were there a substantial amount of people denying PTSD's existence/credibility? I ask this because before PTSD was recognized, it seems like many people condescended and ignored people with shell shock, as it was called back then, as Virginia Woolf's Mrs. Dalloway shown. So when PTSD was diagnosed as a mental illness, did some people deny its status saying "people don't have PTSD. They are just cowards!" and how numerous were they?
I'm sorry if this post has some misconceptions about PTSD and its history. I was born in 1998 and most of what I know about PTSD comes from The Legend of Korra and these two posts.
Thanks in advance!
1 Answers 2017-05-22
(Sorry... Couldn't help myself)
Seriously though, as I understand, in recent decades medievalists have completely upended the traditional hierarchical model of the middle ages known as "Feudalism", leading to the pithy saying any long time reader here has probably seen that "Feudalism Doesn't Real".
But what does that mean for our understanding of the western European peasantry? In the laymen's understanding at least the idea of serfdom is so tied in with the idea of "Feudalism", so is that also not a term we use any more? Or does the disappearance of the traditional "Feudal" model really mean a new understanding of the upper parts, and the serfs are still, well, serfs?
1 Answers 2017-05-22
I've heard a lot of things thrown around. 'Kepler's methods were instrumental for modern science' or 'Aristotle's deduction was the first major step in science' or 'Francis Bacon's induction was the beginning of modern science'. I was hoping someone here would have a general idea of the history of science.
Recommended reading would be appreciated as well. Thanks.
1 Answers 2017-05-22
My dad is a former Cold War soldier, and he told me that the Canadian military (as with all the other allied nations) were there at the request of the Federal Republic of Germany (also known as West Germany), and if they wanted the Germans could have told them to leave. But of course, why would they.
So anyway, at what point did West Germany transfer from an area of occupation post-WW2 to a more autonomous state? My dad served in Germany from 1982 to 1985, so this was really late cold war. Other than that timeframe, I know that the Saar Protectorate (which was under the control of France) was returned to West Germany in 1957.
1 Answers 2017-05-22
So I know that July and August were added and named after Julius and Augustus Caesar, but the months of the year towards the end don't correspond to the Latin number associated with said month. As in DECember would have been the tenth month not the twelfth etc. What were the other two called?
1 Answers 2017-05-22