What actual, documented proof is there of his linguistic prowess (or lack of)? Was it all a clever ploy to only speak 'Wookiee' and refuse to lower himself to speaking English? Or, was he in reality, just not smart enough to learn?

In most other legends of zelda, it never seems the events of the wand of gamelon are referenced.

Prior to the Chinese bombing, the founders of both the Brotherhood and the Enclave were part of the Department of Defense, with the exception of extraordinary circumstances where they were coerced by a single individual into cooperation, they have had extraordinary hostilities?

There's no way some guy from the desert flew a plane into space station without being shot down. Proton torpedoes can't explode steel beams. It was the Empire, they planted explosives before the torpedoes hit.

Was it really because of political purposes? After I got out of the NCR Army I worked as a caravan escort, and I heard a lot of RUMINT from old army buddies that Kimball had entire battalions of Rangers "chasing ghosts" in the Baja. What's going on?

I can't help but think that if we had had more troops at the battle, it wouldn't have ended with a couple thousand Securitrons forcing the NCR to sign a new treaty at gun point and essentially formalizing House as the king of New Vegas, as well as cutting off the NCR from the waters of Lake Mead forever.

As stated in the title, I'd like to delve into the historicity of "The History of the World". Anyone's particular area of insight is welcome, but my specific inquiry is the use of choreography, mugging the camera and synchronized swimming to extract confessions from heretics.

For the record, I would ask nicely.

I heard the Imperials faked it, look at Vvardenfell, parts of that island are perfect for faking a moon landing.

I know this is a controversial question, but I'm curious as to how academics see the events in Bahak in 2185. Hackett's autobiography presents it as a regrettable, but necessary mission. Batarian sources, especially Go'Drak's Downfall of the Hegemony, claim it was an Alliance covert ops, supposedly to weaken the Hegemony before the Reapers arrived.

Is there a consensus on Shepard's actions?

I originally asked this on /r/BadHistory, but they redirected me here

What was going on in the wizarding world that allowed for such a malicious wizard to gain such a following--why were Death Eaters so inclined to indulge in their prejudices against muggles? Did Riddle take advantage of pre-existing prejudices, or were these beliefs actually instigated by him? How was he able to turn a clandestine organization into a full-blown coup?

Seriously they claimed a comet somehow made firebenders strong enough to melt stone beams

They claim korra dated asami however we all know they where just friends sickos.

They claimed that the pheonix king was somehow evil when he was unlawfully slain by the Aang.

They lie about being nonbenders to claim that they aren't priveleged.

they unlawfully arrested the red lotus

They claim "Raava" supported the avaters takeover of the water tribes

They pretend that nonbenders aren't inferior

They claim the fire pill is somehow "anti-water bender"

seriously why did EJWs pretend they can change history

What party did the Iron Bank seek to put into power? Was there ever any indication of the Greyjoys securing the North for themselves?

What do historians think of the revisionist interpretation that there was no magic, Sauron was assassinated when news of yet another catastrophic defeat reached his court, adding fuel to opponents to his expansionist policies that were already at boiling point - with low-morale troops infighting and all-, leading to his assassination. That the entire mythology was created to lend some legitimacy to Gondorians using a lowly assassin to thwart a rising power.