Right now we are studying Alfred Mahan and Henry Cabot Lodge's theories and ideas, and a thought popped in my head, what events in-between the 1900's and now led to such a large change in imperialistic views? The idea of claiming another land mass (e.g., Samoa, Hawaii, etc), was widespread and seemed completely normal.
Now, if another country even goes so far to step foot in another nation, you wouldn't find some politicians saying "Survival of the fittest!" and shrugging it off.
Another example would be Grover Cleveland , who was ridiculed (by these people), for not annexing Hawaii, which is the complete opposite of what people would do today.
So what happened? Was the the world wars? Was it, in a sense, that essentially every country in possession of someone?
I'd really love it if someone could enlighten me on this, I feel really incomplete right now.
1 Answers 2014-11-05
How many people here follow up stated sources? It occurred to me if one knew enough obscure journal names or books and a smattering of author you could very well fake references and just call them hard to access. Assuming you were into that kind of thing of course.
4 Answers 2014-11-05
I've been looking around and it seems that those little mini ovens next to the larger hearths in colonial homes were for baking bread? Were they used for anything else? I've always been curious about these little nooks and would love some more info, unfortunately there doesn't seem to be a definitive guide online...
2 Answers 2014-11-05
3 Answers 2014-11-05
Let me ask some questions:
How many new subscribers sign up for this sub a day? A month? A year?
How many new history books, scholarly articles, documentaries etc. produced a day? A month? A year?
I'm willing to bet it's quite a few. Opinions are constantly evolving, new stories are constantly being told and new minds and new information are always coming to the forefront.
Why then, when someone asks an interesting, thought provoking question are we rudely linking them to the sidebar that has years old posts?
If people are interested in a subject, or want a question answered, how about we use new minds, new voices, new resources and new ideas craft new answers for them and for this sub at large?
10 Answers 2014-11-05
This weekly feature is a place to discuss new developments in fields of history and archaeology. This can be newly discovered documents and archaeological sites, recent publications, documents that have just become publicly available through digitization or the opening of archives, and new theories and interpretations.
3 Answers 2014-11-05
1 Answers 2014-11-05
1 Answers 2014-11-05
I come from Broken Bow, Oklahoma in the U.S., I'm curious if anyone here knows any of the history in that part of Oklahoma. Just a personal study of mine, I can go back to the 1880s but I'm curious if anyone knows any history of that time or a little after.
2 Answers 2014-11-05
Pakistani here. I meant to ask my grandfather this since he was in his early teens at the time but he passed away before I got the chance.
At least as I was taught in school, India was part of the British empire until after the war. I would think that the empire would have used some of our population as soldiers, but I have never really heard of our role in the war.
4 Answers 2014-11-05
Both West and East Germany faced the same problem during the first decade of the Cold War - their respective alliances required them to remilitarise, but all of the officers with experience would have fought for Nazi Germany and Germany's military traditions and institutions were tainted by Prussianism and militarism stretching back centuries.
Whilst things like Manstein's work with the Bundeswehr are well known, browsing through old photographs the Volksarmee to me at least appears more Wehrmacht-like than the Bundeswehr and there are also examples of former-Wehrmacht officers serving in the Volksarmee. This really surprised me as I would have expected the East German Army to take on a far more transformative character than the West German Army, and it had me wondering how the two armies approached this problem and rationalised their position within wider society.
1 Answers 2014-11-05
First, I recognize that this question presupposes some massive generalizations and I apologize for that. I am looking sort of for general answers, but specific ones work too.
This question occurred to me as I was reading the Wikipedia article on the Walk to Canossa. The article says that "[f]earing further rebellion among the German aristocracy, Henry felt he had to have his excommunication lifted." I was surprised -- I would have thought a truly pious person would be more motivated by the thought of having their eternal soul damned to hell (you'll have to forgive my unnuanced views of contemporary theology) than the potential for a temporal power struggle.
Now, this particular example could be a result of a misleading Wikipedia article but it got me thinking and I'm interested -- I'd never thought too deeply about it, but I'd always kind of imagined pre-Enlightenment Europe being almost unshakably devout (which in retrospect just seems silly). The next example that came to mind was Henry VIII, who took a pretty big risk from a theological perspective for temporal reasons.
So was I wrong? Were there atheist/agnostic/indifferent monarchs in those days? Or were most of them indeed devout Christians?
5 Answers 2014-11-05
To me they seem nearly identical. I'd love to know the differences.
1 Answers 2014-11-05
1 Answers 2014-11-05
Edit: I know that Leif Erikson founded some small settlements in what is now Canada, but as far as I know, he didn't create any permanent colonies there. Correct me if I'm wrong.
It's very difficult to find civil discussions about the matter. For example, this link that I found started out with some decent arguments from both sides, but then insults started being thrown around, and it eventually the topic changed to Asian Indians.
The thread I linked to has a few pictures of bearded statues, but the guy who posted the pictures of the bearded statues didn't provide sources, he just said that statues were Mayan.
Besides claims that ancient American bearded statues don't look like Native Americans, another theory the Euro-centrists like to bring up is the Solutrean hypothesis, which claims that European Solutreans were the donor culture of the Clovis culture. I really don't know much beyond that. The Solutrean hypothesis doesn't seem to have much evidence backing it up.
Arguments about bearded statues tend to revolve around whether or not Native Americans are capable of growing beards. Also, people rarely post sources of the bearded statues they post. And often times, doing backwards image searches leads me to blogs, which also don't provide sources. I know of a few examples of American archeological sites with bearded statues, but those are just the ones I found on my own. Does anyone here know anything about the bearded statues that were posted in the thread I linked to? Where were they found?
What subreddit would be good for asking which pure-blooded Native American ethnicities can grow beards? Every time someone posts a picture of a Native American with a beard, someone else will claim that the man is mixed race. Is there anyway I could find the DNA test results of a bearded Native North/South American man?
Feel free to recommend subreddits where you think this topic is relevant.
You don't have to focus your arguments around bearded statues and the Solutrean hypothesis. I just mentioned those because those are the two main things that Euro-centrists bring up when discussing this topic.
3 Answers 2014-11-05
Sometimes when I read about the Aztec Alliance and how come it fell so fast, people often mention the diseases brought by the Spaniards to the new world, and the Aztec fiercest enemies. However, most times the Malinche is left out. Why? As I recall from history lessons back home, the Aztec Alliance fell due to the Spanish diseases, the Aztec enemies AND the Malinche, and her role is not really fully diminished as I have seen in other sites.
1 Answers 2014-11-05
Or did they just confess to that in the hope they'd be released? How much, if any, of their confession was true?
2 Answers 2014-11-05
1 Answers 2014-11-05
I came across a collection of supposedly medieval illustrations on the web. Is there any particular reason to why this is?
http://solairedesign.net/medieval-times-10-great-sun-illustrations/
1 Answers 2014-11-05
I've read that Stalin hated Zhukov, but he quickly recognized that Zhukov was the best general he had and couldn't get rid of him. Also, I read that Zhukov was one of the few clever enough to handle Stalin's rages.
Is this accurate? Did Zhukov stand up to Stalin?
I know Zhukov protected competent generals like Rokossovsky. He must have had some clout to do that.
1 Answers 2014-11-05
I'm writing a novel for my creative writing class. Its an alternative history story where the Mongols have colonized the west coast of North America. As America travels west, they find the mongols and war ensues. This story takes place in the 1830s. What technology, militaristic or otherwise, would be available to the average American?
1 Answers 2014-11-05