Was the Acropolis intended for the public, to teach the mythology of Athens? Or did it have a different purpose?

Did any mercenaries like today's Private Military Companies fight in any of the world wars? And if not, was it because mercenaries were not really in demand with all the conscription and what not?

Hi, I'll be honest. I'm studying for an exam in Latin American history right now and having a hard time with this question. What I've come up with so far is that some signs are, obviously, a few of the uprisings - the revolt in Quito 1765, the Comunero uprising and later on the Túpac Amaru revolt... But what are the signs in Brasil? Sure, the slaves revolted but from what I can tell these revolts and uprisings were all small and relatively insignificant.

Also, I'm wondering if anyone here could tell me concretely what actions Spain and Portugal took to in order to regain strong control over their colonies?

Thank you!

PS Excuse me if there are any incorrect sentences or something like that, English is not my first language

Particularly interested in the question of transportation, and transportation by sea, in the Greco-Roman world. But I'm interested in all ancient livestock manuals that might still be largely extant.

I read in a previous post here, that religious life did not amount to much. All a person had to do to be counted religious, were periodical sacrifices. I wanted to ask if there was any serious belief that those who believed in Zeus, were the 'rightful' and those who did not were 'sinners' and went to Hades to join Sysiphus or Tantalus? Maybe like a classical equivalent of the Crusades.

Specifically, what came of the people? Did they hold some minor titles, are there even any historical records of their existence after Pepin the Short took the crown?

Are there any historical records on how elections were conducted in the Roman Republic? If so, is there any mention of what measures were taken to prevent fudging the numbers?

Was there any successful invasions of near successful after William the conqueror ?

I've heard that former British colonies in general ended up better off than former non-British colonies. Is this true, and if it is, why? And are there any books on this?

It was difficult to find a copy, but it seems like the majority of the document is Tenskatawa's interview, who historically had an agenda, and perhaps a manipulative view of the settlers. Does this manuscript hold up historically?

I am a senior history major who is graduating in December and I am just now looking at master's programs. I want to pursue an MA in East Asian Studies or history (I want to focus on post-war Japan with emphasis on the bubble period) and I was looking at Cal State schools. My professor recommended Long Beach State, San Jose State, and Sacramento State along with UC Riverside and UC Irvine, but I noticed that the Cal States do not require GRE scores. Does that mean that they aren't quality programs? I'm leaning towards CSUs because I am looking to save money and I have read that funding is hard to come by for master's students as opposed to doctoral students.

Which things that Moses did do historians generally accept as true and which are more likely exaggerated or even fictional? Who was Moses really?