So I've gotten into this discussion a few times on reddit, and Ive just been going off my knowledge of the subject, but is there any significant difference of the two timeliness and how slaves of all races were treated?
1 Answers 2014-08-08
1 Answers 2014-08-08
My history of Spain only consists of them being a major power in the colonial period and then being a total pushover in the Spanish American War. What happened?
1 Answers 2014-08-08
1 Answers 2014-08-08
A number of modern Polish and Catholic sources offer variations on this anecdote, as do some evangelicals in hilariously lurid form. Many people even remember it happening to them personally.
It strikes me as implausible for a number of ideological and practical reasons, and the oldest reference I can find cites a Mussolini-era Italian newspaper.
Does anyone know if there are solid contemporary references to support the story, or at least something like it? Was the Stalinization of Eastern Europe really conducted in such a heavy-handed, overtly idolatrous form?
1 Answers 2014-08-08
1 Answers 2014-08-08
Before I go on to further flesh out what I'm asking, I'd like to be clear that I'm writing this from the perspective of a relatively young 20 year old American.
Whenever I see any material describing WWII, America is glorified. We are saints that more or less come down from heaven to then beat submission into the hellish German and Japanese soldiers. However, when I, myself, try to look at WWII in a critical manner, all I see are corrupt, Orwellian governments fighting each other and committing atrocities left and right simply because that's what governments do.
The United States sent over 100,000 Japanese inhabitants into internment camps with no justification, and Harry Truman was either stupid or vile enough to drop not one but two atomic bombs onto Japanese cities. Germany killed over 11 million political dissenters, including Jews, homosexuals, and communists, and equivalently, the U.S.S.R sent over 14 million political dissenters to the Gulag. Furthermore, the Japanese military almost gleefully carried out the Nanking Massacre as well as various other atrocities.
I understand that objectively Germany killed the most, but its intentions were no less malicious than any other government's at the time. When then, if ever, will we no longer view ourselves as saints in this period? This has already happened with WWI. I remember when being taught about it, my teacher pointed out that no side was easily identified as good or bad, and to me, the same is true with WWII as well.
So then, will my opinion ever be shared, or am I going to always be in the minority with my view?
Also, to be clear, I'm referring to how contemporary media portrays WWII. I would hope that historians at least have an unbiased perspective.
Edit ---
I realize that many of you dislike most of this post, but I'm still enjoying and learning from this discussion. So, thank you.
5 Answers 2014-08-08
1 Answers 2014-08-08
1 Answers 2014-08-08
Many of you know the story of the summer, 1916 shark attacks that occurred off of the coast of New Jersey. The attacks were foundational to our national shark hysteria and collective fear of sharks in general. It is also believed that they were the inspiration for Peter Benchely's novel Jaws. Here is the Wikipedia for those of you who may not be familiar with the events. This article (that was posted in r/UShistory) about the events referenced the fact that before the attacks, it was widely believed that sharks were relatively harmless. I can't help but question this, as obviously this wasn't the first shark attack that ever occurred, nor the last. Is this article correct in its assertion that it was widely believed sharks were benign and harmless creatures?
EDIT: the title should have read something like "New Jersey Shark Attacks, 1916" or something. The Matawan Creek attack is usually included in the story of these attacks. Should have been more specific.
2 Answers 2014-08-08
All I can really think of is the American South...
edit: The disagreement seems to be over the role the civil war played in saving or destroying Spain. Half the country sees Franco as a fascist dictator who set Spain back fifty years, while the other half view him as an imperfect savior of Spain from the communist menace.
1 Answers 2014-08-08
.
1 Answers 2014-08-08
2 Answers 2014-08-08
We got into a discussion at work about falling overboard a sailing vessel and being left behind. We were curious about the following question:
How would 17th century sailing companies, navies, and pirates deal with men who fell overboard?
Would there be any attempt to save a man who fell overboard? Did different groups during the era have differing policies/procedures? Was there a status level (rank? worth? aristocracy?) at which one would be worth an attempt at saving? Are there any great man-overboard stories?
Thank you so much for any consideration!
3 Answers 2014-08-08
I came across this comment on an article about dog breeding discussing the owner's Frisian shepherd:
"During the Little Ice Age (ca. 1350 to ca. 1850) polar bears were the major predators of sheep in Friesland. The Frisian Shepherd was bred similarly to how the polar bear evolved, to be inconspicuous against the ice and the snow. That way, a pack of them could get the jump on any polar bears that threatened their charges."
Is there any truth to this? I am highly skeptical.
3 Answers 2014-08-08
3 Answers 2014-08-08
Did they have the maritime skills and resources to reach the Americas from Europe?
2 Answers 2014-08-08
I realize the show as a whole takes serious liberties with historical accuracy, but for some reason this particular issue stuck with me.
The characters Titus Pullo and Lucius Vorenus occasionally wear what look like crudely stitched olive drab/light brown t-shirts with a screen-printed roman eagle standard.
Is this at all historically accurate? If so, how common was this practice of printing designs on fabric for everyday use? And what was the technique involved... was it similar to the modern screen-printing process?
Screenshot of the shirt on screen: http://i.imgur.com/kCad8Ki.jpg
2 Answers 2014-08-08
Referencing the literacy test referred to here, I was just curious if this test was an actual real-life test, or maybe just something that was cooked up by the 1960's version of The Onion. I've seen it referenced in a lot of conversations, but it always looked just a little bit too over-the-top clever to be real.
And as a further question, how would a historian actually go about deciding if a document of this sort was real or not? This one seems to have been used by a teacher as a classroom demonstration, and eventually worked its way into the archives of a civil rights organization. What kind of proof would a historian look for to verify its authenticity?
1 Answers 2014-08-08
The only answer I have to this is that they were "scapegoats" which isn't such an intellectually satisfying answer.
The only hunch I have is that the Jews, as they often do, persevered in a much stronger manner than the average German before, during, and after WWI.
1 Answers 2014-08-08
I'm talking about the average person, whatever that might be.
Alternatively, if you don't know about Aztecs, I'd be interested to find out about life in any of the major native American cultures.
1 Answers 2014-08-08
Who has decided who can perform the Hajj? How long have e.g. Indonesian muslims been allowed to Kaaba. Has the access to Kaaba been subject to political pressures and how?
1 Answers 2014-08-08