Oppenheimer’s recitation of “I am become death, the destroyer of worlds” has become very well known (and rightfully so, what a line!), but I’ve always wondered about why that came to mind for him.
Was this something that was particularly culturally relevant at time? Would it have been meaningful to his peers in the scientific community or the press? Was there an intellectual tradition that included the Bhagvad Gita, or was this a particular interest to Oppenheimer?
2 Answers 2021-05-29
On the maps of ww2 Germany Switzerland just stays not being part of Germany. Why doesn't Hitler take over it?
1 Answers 2021-05-29
1 Answers 2021-05-29
The Wikipedia page for the Umayyad Caliphate shows a map of the Caliphate’s territory at its greatest extent reaching around the south of the Caspian Sea, but not touching its shore. Was there a reason why the Caliphate did not reach the southern shore?
1 Answers 2021-05-29
From Wikipedia :
The Taipings began marching north in September 1851 to escape Qing forces closing in on them. The Taiping army pressed north into Hunan following the Xiang River, besieging Changsha, occupying Yuezhou, and then capturing Wuchang in December 1852
[...]
On March 19, 1853, the Taipings captured the city of Nanjing
The Qing army had one whole year to destroy the Taiping movement before it became too strong to handle, but yet the Taiping were literally able to capture cities unmolested.
1 Answers 2021-05-29
When Varus got ambushed by Arminius the land was described as very lightly populated, the Roman army would have gone days without seeing a settlement, but 1000 years later these same lands were the home to the only Catholic Empire in Europe.
was it a societal change? a technological one?
1 Answers 2021-05-29
1 Answers 2021-05-29
Hello hello. As someone who's terminally online, I'll often come across rather detailed arguments between folks who consider themselves leftist over points like, say, property rights or electoralism. All of this feels halfway between interesting and arcane to me, and it makes me wonder about the origins of these arguments, and how these various schools of leftism distinguish themselves from one another.
I had thought there must be a glut of books on the market that do this, but to my surprise, I haven't been able to find anything published that fits the bill. The closest things I've found appear to be written from a right-wing perspective, and though it's certainly conceivable that such a breakdown would be fair and impartial, I'm not interested in reading about these concepts from a text making explicit value judgments about this stuff, positively or negatively, if at all possible.
So: Does anyone have any recommendations for a book (not a website) that compares the origins and beliefs of various schools of leftism?
1 Answers 2021-05-29
2 Answers 2021-05-29
Today:
AskHistorians is filled with questions seeking an answer. Saturday Spotlight is for answers seeking a question! It’s a place to post your original and in-depth investigation of a focused historical topic.
Posts here will be held to the same high standard as regular answers, and should mention sources or recommended reading. If you’d like to share shorter findings or discuss work in progress, Thursday Reading & Research or Friday Free-for-All are great places to do that.
So if you’re tired of waiting for someone to ask about how imperialism led to “Surfin’ Safari;” if you’ve given up hope of getting to share your complete history of the Bichon Frise in art and drama; this is your chance to shine!
5 Answers 2021-05-29
I was wondering whether there was a dominating, elite of Russians that ensured that all key positions of power within the USSR were solidly within the hands of Russians (akin to Liberia where former American slaves formed the ruling elite in the country whereas its indigineous people formed the lower class). Or was the ruling elite - especially within the CPSU - actually comprised of a multiethnic clique that somewhat adequately reflected the ethnic diversity of the Soviet Union?
Does anyone have any information on that?
1 Answers 2021-05-29
Hello,
Recently I've been doing some research as to my great grandfather's involvement in the war. Unfortunately, when he came home he didn't speak much about it - this means that most of his experiences died with him. I have three photos, likely taken at an army barracks. In one, he's atop his horse and the other two feature him posing on his own and with his squad. Unfortunately, as they were taken circa 1914 the picture quality isn't great. I've tried my best to create high quality scans but there's little I can do for pictures that weren't preserved very well.
Our family has lived in the north of Ireland (now Northern Ireland) for as long as I can trace my lineage back. He was born in either Fermanagh or Antrim, and his family were Protestant. His surname was Campbell and he was 18-19 in 1914. He most likely fought with the 36th Ulster Brigade as a mounted troop, although an insignia on his cap infers that he might have had a different role during the war.
Any more info as to his involvement in the war would be greatly appreciated.
1 Answers 2021-05-29
I mean; did people sunbathe; were there food vendors and facilities on beaches etc. Has humanity always flocked to the coast when it gets hot?
1 Answers 2021-05-29
Ok let me explain that one.
So one day I was browsing on youtube, and I saw a video from one of my favourite youtuber,AlternativeHistoryHub. It was called "The election that ruined everything (and if it never happened)". It was about the 1912 election, and how President Wilson caused many of the bad thing in the 20th century (WW2, the rise of communism, the cold war, etc.). There was also 2 other videos from the Cynical Historian who made two videos about him, and both thumbnails features Wilson as the devil with red horns and glowing red eyes and everything. He talked pretty negatively about him.
I started to look further into this, and to my suprise, I have discovered that he is very hated online. On AlternativeHistory.com, he is often blamed for many things, sometimes jockingly, sometimes seriously. Whenever someone mentions him in a comment under a video on youtube, in the commment and in the reply section, he is always talked about in a very negative way as well.
For the context, I am not american, I live in Hungary, and the only time I was taught about him before going to university is in relation to the Paris Peace Conference and his 14 points. I only learned about his more controversal policies, like resegregation when I was in universty. Where I live, he has a somewhat positive image, so when I discovered how many people hate him, I was really suprised by it.
The fact that so many people blames him, it feels wrong to. I tought "the great man of history" theory is no longer accepted, so why so many people think that he alone is resposible for everything?
For the record, I don't belive we should idealize him, because he certanly did some questionable things. I am just thinking this "Blame everything on one person" thinking is not good, and it is not helpful for future historical discussions. History is complicated, and one person can not cause events big as ww2 to happen. Even the most infuential people in history could not alter history this radically on his own, and many times, the circumstances were simply in the right place in the right time. Or something like that. In short, I feel like he is blamed for things beyond his control.
So I am curious: Is he really responsible for any of the awfull events of the 20th century, or these events would have happened with or without him?
Alternatively, was he always this hated, or this is something recent?
1 Answers 2021-05-29
I come from a Geman noble family in the Grand Duchy of Finland of the Russian Empire. Said family is insignificant and unknown but financially well-off, so money won't be a problem. I'm a Protestant Christian that knows several major European languages and was educated in art, proper manners and the like.
After considering a military career and studying in Paris, I decide the greatest adventure would be travelling the world. I want to visit Berlin, Bombay and Hong Kong.
Will crossing borders be a problem? How difficult will it be for a private person with no connection to royalty, large corporations or the military to get to and enter a foreign country? How will I travel most comfortably?I'm assuming it'd be by ship, but how would I book a cabin in one? Would I find accommodation? How would I find my way around once I'm there, given I wouldn't have a host or employer waiting for me?
1 Answers 2021-05-29
I heard alot of battles and stories where supply lines were extremely long or otherwise difficult to move/use, some of these were on plains where I'd assume fruits and berries etc could be found, why was armies living off the land so rare? (I'm not talking about deserts or anything, maybe just plains and farmlands), I know the time may vary so why would this not happen in medieval armies?
2 Answers 2021-05-29
2 Answers 2021-05-29
Just getting into history. i want to study about the history of the west and the entire middle east in depth. What resources should i use? Are there any good factual documentaries, books, apps etc anyone knows about to make this easy? is there any good online resource u normally use to study history?
1 Answers 2021-05-29
2 Answers 2021-05-29
I know we don’t have the exact numbers but ideally I’m looking for an answer that gives generous, moderate, and conservative estimates with some of the reasoning walked through. Thanks in advance! ☺️
1 Answers 2021-05-29
Original Source:
https://www.thepinktriangle.com/history/symbol.html
I'm seeing this claim repeated in a few different places but I can't find a more primary source. On its face it doesn't seem like too ridiculous a claim, but on the other hand, the idea that Nazi prison guards were allowed to stick around and get paid to hold a gun and prevent these people from leaving while everybody else goes free seems incredibly questionable to me.
How did this go down, if it did? And for how long?
1 Answers 2021-05-29
I'll admit this question is inspired by an episode of TNG. (S6E21 if curious.) But it has me wondering, are there any documented historical cases of actors losing the ability to differentiate the characters they play from their own real-life selves? For example, has there ever been a method actor who got so into their character that they actually believed themselves to be that character? (At least as far as anyone in their life could tell?) Has there ever been a documented case of an actor losing the ability to separate fantasy from reality, and actually perceiving themselves to literally be a character they were playing?
2 Answers 2021-05-29
I was recently reading The Walls Have Ears: The Greatest Intelligence Operation of World War II by Helen Fry, which details the incarceration and surveillance of German generals in stately homes in southern England during the Second World War. On a number of occasions, the author mentions that prisoners were repatriated, before the end of the war, to Germany. How was this possible, logistically? Wouldn't transporting prisoners across occupied Europe have been exceedingly dangerous, whether by land or sea? Also, how would the two sides be communicating to make these arrangements?
I've read that mail, Red Cross parcels etc. were routed through Switzerland and/or Sweden, but how did they reach these places without being seized or destroyed in disputed waters or Nazi-occupied territories?
1 Answers 2021-05-29
1 Answers 2021-05-29
In most period pieces that depict this time period, everyone has southern accents. Obviously southern accents are from the south, and the "wild west" was in the west. Is there any basis for southern accents being the norm in the late 1800's western U.S.? What would people in this era/time period have sounded like?
1 Answers 2021-05-29