I was wondering about the range and speed of the projectile from a cannons, as well as its force
When i say cannon I mean the "classic" one, the one we see depicted in movies and media, often in the hands of pirates or the naval force of that time
Idk if this question is allowed by the rules of this sub or of it falls under the category of "trivia seeking" i just didn't know where to ask, if someone could direct me to a subreedit more fitted to answer me I will gladly delete my post and move it to there, anyways, thank you for your time
1 Answers 2020-09-21
Let's say that a princes from Spain would marry an English prince or that a prince from France would marry a princess from Poland or the Holy Roman Empire, would the princesses ladies in waiting from her home country travel with her, to her new country? And if yes, would they remain there until their families would find them matches back home or would they marry nobles from the country in whose royal family the princess they serve has married?
1 Answers 2020-09-21
The Catholic Church having had extensive experience at dealing with various heretic movements prior to this (as experienced by the Cathars), how did Luther and the Reformation movement achieve such widespread success?
1 Answers 2020-09-21
And was/is it unique to the American submarine service or was the idea borrowed from elsewhere?
1 Answers 2020-09-21
Or was the word "wizard" just a name for a person of science or medic (potion master)?
1 Answers 2020-09-21
All different forms of Pagan religions from the Slavs, Germanic peoples, Celts, Sarmatians, Alans etc. were effectively eradicated or their populace converted to Christianity.
Yet, Judaism still always had a constant minority following that was never fully eradicated. Why is this? Is it because of Judaism's ties to the Old Testament and Christianity? Were they viewed as "people of the book" and given some leeway in the same way Muslims would do ?
1 Answers 2020-09-21
Came across this comment that makes this claim. How true is this?
1 Answers 2020-09-21
1 Answers 2020-09-21
In many examples of fiction there is a plot where “medicine” is the macguffin. In modern stories, I always assume the unspecified “medicine” is antibiotics.
But in historical fiction, I always think of “medicine” being practiced by bird-mask-wearing plague doctors and using “medicine” that often did more harm than good.
In Assassin’s Creed Black Flag, the pirates justify their acts of piracy at once point by saying that the seafaring empires are hoarding medicine and they need the medicine to help their sick city.
Is this just a convenient literary device to make the pirates seem like more than thieves? Or is there actually a precedent for this? Would there be a type of “medicine” carried around in little glass “tonic” bottles that would actually have legitimate life-saving ability? And what would that medicine be?
2 Answers 2020-09-21
A few years ago, popular conservative commentator Steven Crowder made a video 'debunking' a lot of common talking points on the Crusades. The video is actually the most popular video covering the Crusades on the internet, however, to my knowledge much of the information he presented to his audience was either highly manipulated or downright wrong. Some of his claims are so ridiculous or easy to refute, like him claiming that Ottoman Turks attacked the Byzantine Empire before the First Crusade, instead of the Seljuk Turks. A lot of the video doesn't even cover the Crusades, rather Islam as a whole (and I personally believe that the video was created as a trojan horse for Crowder to preach his blatant islamophobia rather than educate his audience about the truth about the Crusades). He has an article and a list of sources corresponding with his video, which I've looked through and some of those sources are also extremely unreliable, such as Bill Warner's "Destruction of Classical Civilization" map. The YouTuber Three Arrows made a great response video to Crowder, but I'm wondering if anything that Crowder mentions within his Crusades video is true, specifically his points about mass muslim invasions and abuse toward members of other religions. I'd appreciate it if anyone could help deduce if Crowder is entirely full of shit or if he makes some accurate claims.
2 Answers 2020-09-21
How did Cadet Branches work (do work?) exactly in this case from a bugreport (if it is a bug) of crusader kings 3: https://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum/threads/ck-iii-landed-parent-can-create-cadet-branch-that-changes-player-characters-house-from-dynastys-main-house.1425865/
In short: If I was grown up, part of a house, my father decides to "open up a cadet branch", am I and my decendants now automatally part of the cadet branch or do we have a say in it?
My guess is that there is no general rule of how it went, but I would like to know.
1 Answers 2020-09-21
I feel like my high school education sort of left out some of the lesser known wars in American history and now I know near nothing of the Texas Revolution.
2 Answers 2020-09-21
1 Answers 2020-09-21
2 Answers 2020-09-21
More than 50% of NHL players are Canadian, but 7/31 teams are based in Canada.
I assume it's just because the US provides a bigger market and therefore more revenue. But I'd be interested to hear more about the history.
1 Answers 2020-09-21
TLDR at the botton of post.
Sorry, kind of a clickbait question. This Russian news site has published an article about five supposed myths about the Soviet occupation of the Baltic states. This article and news site in general is obvious Kremlin propaganda, but sadly alot of nationalists in Russia and abroad believe such nonsense, one of them being my own mother.
Some of the supposed ”myths” and their corresponding ”truths” are:
Myth 1. The Soviet entry into the Baltic was an occupation.
The truth: It cannot legally be called a occupation according to the IV Hague Convention because these states were not at war with each other. Also entry of the Red Army was done on a contractual basis. The authorities of the Baltic states concluded agreements on mutual assistance with the USSR and their parliaments themselves chose to join the Union.
Myth 3. As a result of the "Soviet occupation" the socio-economic development of the Baltic countries lagged behind for several decades.
The truth: All three of the Baltic republics were some of the most prosperous in the USSR and received much more financial and material resources than the RSFSR for example.
Myth 4. The citizens of the Baltic republics were oppresed.
The truth: All three republics had their own Council of Ministers, their own republican ministries and departments, headed by ethnic Latvians, Lithuanians and Estonians. There were no concentration camps in the Baltics. Alot of Soviet cinema was filmed there and it was called ”The Soviet Hollywood” So what kind of oppression can we talk about? All these claims are just russophobia.
The myths I have left out I felt were irrelevant.
So historians, is there any truth to this kind of reasoning? What parts of this article are just unfair technicalities, convenient absense of relevant information and which are the blatant lies? Please help me debunk this type nationalist propaganda for my mother and other russian relatives.
TL;DR : Help me debunk this propaganda article for people like my fiercely nationalist russian mother.
Use Google Translate for this article as it is in russian.
1 Answers 2020-09-21
It’s said that the children of Ragnar Lodbrok are legitimate historical figures. So why are they called Ragnars’ children if Ragnar didn’t exist? Who were their fathers if not Ragnar?
1 Answers 2020-09-21
Did mongolians seriously burn all those precious books and pieces of art, or this is an alibi fictionalized by the middle eastern historians in order to claim that their improvement is ceased for reasons beyond their control.
A friend of mine, in whom i did not confide, said mongolians did not burn those books, rather Hulagu make them transfered to city of Kazan. Then, they stayed there in safety until Ivan the Terrible's persecution over Tatars is started.
1 Answers 2020-09-21
German and British tanks of world war 2, such as the Panzer IV / V or the Cromwell have turrets that consist out of multiple flat metal plates , that are wielded / riveted together. Meanwhile tank turrets of the US or the Soviet Union ( such as the T 34 or the Sherman ) have more extreme shapes and far less flat areas or even none at all.
I assume that this might be due to US and Soviet tanks utilizing turrets made out of cast metal which allows for more complex shapes ? But then again. Why didn't the UK or Germany make use of cast metal turrets, after all they seem to provide better protection due to allowing for less flat areas?
2 Answers 2020-09-21
Is it related to the revolution in Haiti?
1 Answers 2020-09-21
Ok I can understand that many of them maybe did not actually like Hitler and were just following orders because they were afraid (I doubt that but I accept it as an argument) but it is still your homeland, your capitol your civilians your families there... how could they just retreat to the west instead of going full "this is sparta" mode inside the city with whatever they had?
1 Answers 2020-09-21
I’m looking at this Wikipedia entry https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_theological_demons and there are a lot of demons categorized as being part of Christian demonology. However, many of them usually originate from the Ars Goetia, and in turn originate from other grimoires. Many of these, as far as my knowledge goes, are not mentioned in the Bible. The author himself has said that none of it exists and people who believe in it are delusional. So, my question is how are these related to Christianity? Is it just Wikipedia making a mistake? Even so, I’ve seen some Christians saying these grimoires are real and sinful, which is confusing because most of these demons are never named anywhere but in spell books and encyclopedias.
1 Answers 2020-09-21