In popular culture, radiation is overwhelmingly green - from the Toxic Avenger to Nuke ‘Em High to the Incredible Hulk to Homer Simpson...when radiation is an issue, it’s green. Why is that?
2 Answers 2020-08-16
Do unto others as you would have done unto you. Treat others the easy you want to be treated.
There's evidence that this was thought of and taught long before ~30 CE by various Greek and Chinese philosophers. But would it have seemed like a new and different idea to the Jews of the day?
How would it have fit in their cultural context? Would they have known about Confucius teaching the same thing, or would Jesus have seemed to be the first to think of it?
1 Answers 2020-08-16
I know that samurai sometimes had offhand weapons like the Daisho, but I'm curious if people actually used two weapons that normally would be wielded by itself
1 Answers 2020-08-16
The plane broke into pieces upon landing and no crews were found inside. All the parachutes were unused as well.
Supposedly the plane is from 91st Bombardment Group and the crew were accounted for elsewhere in Belgium.
This sounded incredibly unfeasible and the only articles I was able to find didn’t have much citations.
Does anyone recognize this story?
Is it possible, that this is one of those stories that got blown out of proportions after being told and re-told?
1 Answers 2020-08-16
Today:
Welcome to this week's instalment of /r/AskHistorians' Sunday Digest (formerly the Day of Reflection). Nobody can read all the questions and answers that are posted here, so in this thread we invite you to share anything you'd like to highlight from the last week - an interesting discussion, an informative answer, an insightful question that was overlooked, or anything else.
3 Answers 2020-08-16
1 Answers 2020-08-16
As we come to the final few installments of the Roundtables, we still have a hodgepodge of rules left unaddressed. Many of the rules on this subreddit are 'big ones', which we have spent a good deal of time on to explain their reasoning, and their interpretation. The ones that we'll be going over today are... less so.
All of the rules we'll be covering today basically fall under the rubric of keeping the subreddit tidy. As has been well covered at this point, the intention of the subreddit is to provide a curated space for contributions made by experts. We have rules to provide guidance about what that stuff looks like, and we remove the stuff that doesn't quite get there.
But then there is the stuff that doesn't even try. The various comments from users who show up from /r/All having no idea what the subreddit is, the ones browsing on the App where the interface does a terrible job reminding you which subreddit you are in, or the occasional jerk who wants to cause trouble. We remove these too, but can spend a lot less time on providing guidance about what they are!
We don't allow joke posts here. Simple as that. A good answer which includes humor is acceptable, and encouraged even, but the jokes should just be decoration for something that otherwise follows the rules about an answer. If you post a comment that is only a joke, it will be removed, and you will be warned. We have no interest in allowing threads to feature that content and force good answers to compete with it for attention.
Replying to an answer is usually appreciated, but, we expect those replies to relate to the topic, and to make a meaningful contribution to the content. Follow-up questions are fine, further expansion is fine, "Thank You" posts are usually fine too as noted below, but if things start to get off topic, the mods will nip it in the bud. This isn't a general discussion subreddit. We don't need chains of comment reminiscing about your favorite childhood vacation or swapping pictures of your puppers. If you want to post something like that, please hold onto it, and remember to share every Friday in the 'Free-for-All' thread instead!
If you think the question is interesting, great! Upvote it, but please don't post "What an interesting question!" If you have a question about the rules, please reach out to us via Modmail, or create a META thread, but we try to keep that discussion to a minimum in an active thread as it can quickly derail the thread, which is unfair to the OP. Please don't summon RemindMe Bot with a comment in the thread. There is a pre-filled link provided by Automod every time!
Although if you are posting them, you probably aren't the kind of person who reads these Roundtables, nevertheless it should be pointed out that anyone who posts "Where are the comments?" earns our special dislike! The Automod comment we sticky to every thread makes it pretty clear, and if you don't have that patience to read that, well... You don't have much grounds to argue when you get a temporary ban for it as a warning.
Posting something as simple as "Thank You" as a reply to an answer can mean a lot to someone who possibly spent hours working on the piece. A few words go a long way, and we very much encourage the thanking of contributors! But, with that said, we do try to balance this with the way in which excessive small comments can make the main content harder to fine. Some popular answers might have 20+ such replies which take up several pages while scrolling, and that can be a major negative for the reading experience as you try to find the actual follow-up content.
The first few "Thank You" comments will always be approved, as will ones from the OP of the question, and those which add a bit more heart and soul about what the answer meant to them, but if you see a 'Thank You' post already up, please consider upvoting that one rather than adding your own. It helps cut down on the clutter and make the thread overall more readable. If you really want to say it yourself, consider doing it as part of a larger follow-up question, or to otherwise engage deeper with the comment.
We ban bots on sight. If you have a bot which you believe can offer a service for the subreddit which can be actually meaningful, please reach out to us before you unleash it. We have made exceptions before, but please ask first.
While we have used novelty accounts in the past for April Fools, this is only allowed with explicit mod approval, and those accounts can't post otherwise either. If you post out of character, that is fine if you follow the rules, but please drop the schtick in our subreddit.
This is both a small rule, and a big rule. As we close out the rules page to note:
The above should not be taken to be an absolute list of moderator powers constraining all other action. The moderation team exists to enforce both the rules and the spirit of the subreddit, and may, at times, need to make judgement calls on issues that exist in the grey, undefined areas.
The point is that we are running a community here, and we have a vision for it. The rules page is intended to put that vision into words and provide guidance for what is expected of users, but it can't account for every single scenario. Mods sometimes have to make judgement calls, and you are welcome to appeal that of course, but don't try to rules lawyer us or find loopholes for the sake of arguing about it. Being right, but being an asshole, still makes you an asshole, don't forget.
You can find the rest of this Rules Roundtable series here
1 Answers 2020-08-16
Hi r/AskHistorians! We are u/Iphikrates and /u/joshobrouwers, known offline as Dr. Roel Konijnendijk and Dr. Josho Brouwers. We're here to answer all your questions about the Trojan War, warfare in early Greece, and stack wiping noobs like a basileus.
Josho Brouwers wrote a PhD thesis on Early Greek warfare, in which the Homeric poems and Early Greek art were integral components. He has also taught courses on ancient Greek mythology, Homer, and the Trojan War, and wrote Henchmen of Ares: Warriors and Warfare in Early Greece (2013) as well as another book (in Dutch) on Greek mythology. He is editor-in-chief of Ancient World Magazine.
Roel Konijnendijk is a historian of Classical Greek warfare and historiography, and the author of Classical Greek Tactics: A Cultural History (2018). He is currently a Marie Curie Postdoctoral Fellow at Leiden University, studying the long history of scholarship on Greek warfare.
Ask us anything!
199 Answers 2020-08-16
1 Answers 2020-08-16
1 Answers 2020-08-16
And, as a bonus question I guess, how did universities change - if they did - and when did they start resembling modern universities?
1 Answers 2020-08-16
I checked wikipedia, they brushed it off as a 1980s thing.
Is it a really a recent thing? or does it existed as something different in the past?
1 Answers 2020-08-16
I am aware of the Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere but that idea seems to position itself more in economic and anti-western terms more than some kind of moral appeal. I am wondering if there is any Japanese equivalent that appeals to people on a perceived moral obligation.
I am just feeling out some ideas for a class, and looking to draw some potential similarities and differences. If the way I have surmised the "White man's burden" and the Co-Prosperity Sphere are ham-fisted please correct me as I have made this post in an attempt to learn more.
3 Answers 2020-08-16
I am from India, I have noticed my grandparents refer to brits as people who travelled seven seas to get here, assuming people misunderstood oceans as seas, it is just Arabian sea, Indian ocean, south and north Atlantic ocean, or am I missing something?
1 Answers 2020-08-16
1 Answers 2020-08-16
What are your recommendations for books on American Jewish history? I'm especially interested in the Reform movement and women leaders.
1 Answers 2020-08-16
Zinn’s A People’s History of the United States is now often used as a supplementary text to the textbook in some history classes. I want to know if there was any backlash from the public toward the work of historians as people learned how a narrative can be written in a biased way?
I also want to know how historians in general responded to the popularity of this book, and did this change how historians conceived of their role and relationship to the public?
Would love secondary sources to check out! :)
1 Answers 2020-08-16
Charles C. Mann, in his book, 1491: New Revelations of the Americas Before Columbus, makes this claim.
1 Answers 2020-08-16
In the Old World history, ages starr with the Stone age and progress through bronze and iron, into antiquity and medieval to today. How do historians and archeologists describe the "ages" in the New world? How do they compare with Old World time periods? And how can I better understand the Pre-Columbian New World?
1 Answers 2020-08-16
Or was London always a powerful area that was always destined to control the island ?
1 Answers 2020-08-16
1 Answers 2020-08-16
My family has many stories about sexual trysts and dalliances that go back generations, yet I often hear people say Americans were far less sexually active in the past. Is this a fact, or is it simply people assuming stricter historical social taboos correspond to the historical reality?
2 Answers 2020-08-16