Apologies in advance for the rather morbid question. After listening to a podcast about Spring-Heeled Jack, I got sucked into a wiki-hole and found myself spending some time reading about the infamous murder of Maria Marten by William Corder, what became popularly known as the Red Barn Murder.

My understanding is that books bound in human skin are rare, though a cursory search reveals the existence of a pocket book bound in the tanned skin of William Burke, another infamous 19th century criminal. My hunch is that the practice -while rare- dovetails with the widespread popularity and publicity surrounding specific criminal cases and associated souvenir-mania. Maria's headstone was destroyed by collectors who wanted pieces of memorabilia and the Red Barn was itself supposedly stripped bare, the wood being sold off for tooth picks.

Is this hunch on the right track? How much of these specific practices can we attribute to public fascination with the murder and murderer? What does the treatment of William Corder remains after his death reveal about 19th century British attitudes towards crime, those that commit them, their humanity and the human body?

Additionally, so as not to lose Maria in all of this, how are those subjected to violent crime received and transmitted through popular culture. In other words, with what appears to be a frequent fixation on the one who committed the crime, how were the victims of highly publicized crimes remembered and situated within popular narratives?

I admittedly haven't perused what I consider to be the most reliable sources, so correction on certain (or many) points may be needed. Thanks in advance!

Were they treated in any type of ceremonial manner? Were they fed to dogs? Was a wandering shower thought.

I see records of USN and RN using M2 Browning and Vickers, respectively. How effective were these guns in general? I can't imagine them to have been that useful as most ships armed themselves with 40mm Bofors or 20mm Oerlikons near the end of the war, but I'd still like proper confirmation on this. Thanks.

I had always been under the impression that The Ottomon Empire had been a long-standing enemy of Austria (I blame the Baron von Munchausen) but came to the realization the other day that they had allied themselves with both Germany and Austrio-Hungary during WW1. It seemed odd to me that they would join with historically contentious partners such as this. What was the cause and rationale behind it?

Hello historians.

Im sorry if any of this is wrong, Im very new to this website. only here because my grandson is real tired of me telling him to ask my questions to his history teacher, so he sent me here.

When I was a young kid (long ago!!), I remember my pa and my grampa having a whole disagreement about Civil Rights and especially Dr. Martin Luther King. My pa was a big fan of him and even went to washington on the march and for all my life I have been a big fan as well because of him. But my grampa thought the whole thing was stupid, said that "we should all just keep our heads down or the white man will chop em off.". He told me that the best thing we could do was keep to ourselves and help our neighbours and stay away from the whites. Even as a kid I thought he was just a grumpy old man, Thankfully he died before he knew I married a white woman from Ohio!! But now that Im a grumpy old man myself (haha!!) Ive started to wonder about all of that, and why he thought that way, and if lots of other people were the same, especially the old ones because their all gone now.

So to cut the whole story down and make it clear, Im asking about black people in the Fifties and Sixties and how they felt about Civil Rights. Did lots of people think the whole thing was a bad idea because we were stickin our necks out? Or were most people like my pa and wanted to march on washington and get the laws changed like they did.

Me and my pa are from Georgia if that makes any diffrence. My grampa was the son of a slave and he was born in South Carolina.

Best Wishes, Leonard Snell.

[deleted]

I mean, surely the famous war hero of the Mexican-American war would be much more popular?

I'd be interested either in political discussions, or military planners, as it relates to the possibility of the US attempting military action against Spain either in Spain herself, or even in her nearby possessions such as the Azores or the Canaries.'

Additionally, was there anything of the reverse? Did the Spanish have any hopes of launching an invasion of the US proper?

[deleted]

Im currently fact checking a spurious and badly researched timeline of Christian persecution of pagans by a Greek neopagan. One of the claims he makes is that in 542:

Emperor Justinianus allows the inquisitor Ioannis Asiacus to convert the Gentiles of Phrygia, Caria and Lydia in Asia Minor. Within 35 years of this crusade, 99 churches and 12 monasteries are built on the sites of demolished Pagan Temples.

I cannot find an original source for this and im suspecting its a fabrication. Google searching the name "Ioannis Asiacus" or "Ιωαννης Ασιακος" returns only secondary sources like blogs or self-published books. None of which provide a reference. Does anyone know anything about "Ioannis Asiacus"? Did he exist or not? Thanks!

I come to ask this myself when my grandma gathered some apples and we get to eat apple pie for two weeks straight. Additionally, how did the recipes change over the course of time?

By personal politics I mean politics dominated by the bonds different men had to each other (For example, in a society dominated by personal politics the reason the Duchy of Burgundy would be part of France is not because it is so by law but because the Duke of Burgundy swore loyalty to the King of France or something, and the reason the Duchy of Burgundy is big is because the different lords of the region known as Burgundy are loyal to the lord who calls himself Duke of Burgundy etc.)

Sorry if that's too confusing, I'm kinda drunk right now

Are there any examples left? Like poor quality maille/plate and weapons? How much cheaper/affordable would these things have been?

During the battle of britain, was there fighting in the skies right above major cities?

When a german aircraft was shot down and the crew ejected, what happened when then landed on the ground.

Did they have firearms and would attack UK citizens, Or were there army waiting for them to reach the ground and promptly arrest them?

[deleted]

And then, the further I go into the past, how does my stolen baby differs from other people?