4 Answers 2016-10-02
According to legend, the Japanese military was torturing US Airman Marcus McDilda in the aftermath of the atomic bombings. The Japanese wanted to gauge America's ability to continue atomic attacks. McDilda, of course, had no idea of the number of bombs that the US had, so he made up that America had 100.
Is this just a legend? And did this affect the Japanese's decision to surrender?
1 Answers 2016-10-02
1 Answers 2016-10-02
I am watching this series on Netflix called The History of Maths by Dr Marcus Du Satoy. Fascinating stuff.
In it he says that the ancient Babylonians were the first to conceptualize or invent the concept of zero. But I am Indian, and we are taught almost like canon, that is our ancestors who first did it.
What do historians think?
1 Answers 2016-10-02
I don't know much about German leadership process through the ages, so forgive me my ignorance, but I'm curious given all of the "Trump is Hitler" talk that I hear, what are the parallels? Was Hitler's opponent seen as a corrupt member of an out of touch elite, thus making Hitler more interesting? Is there a parallel to draw here? (ie. History rhyming)
2 Answers 2016-10-02
1 Answers 2016-10-02
Japan had fearsome soldiers. I assume they were about the same height as Western troops?
Did losing the war stunt their growth for half a century?
1 Answers 2016-10-02
For example, who would Evans argue is responsible for the rise of the Nazi party? Or what factors would he argue are the most significant for the creation of the third reich. I'm pretty sure the structuralist argument is that Hitler was a opportunist but I'm still quite confused about the whole structuralist/functionalist argument in comparison to the intentionalist argument. Could someone clear up what the Structuralist/Functionlist argument (Evans) is in comparison to the Intentionalist argument (Shirer)?
Thanks
1 Answers 2016-10-02
1 Answers 2016-10-02
Today the Rockefellers as a collective own as much as 10 billion. Thats is a large chunk of money, but John D Rockefeller's net worth was valued at 336 billion adjusted for inflation. Now typically wealth creates more wealth. So how did this historical figure go from being so ungodly rich with the most powerful company in the world to having his entire family valued at 10 billion between 200 people?
2 Answers 2016-10-02
1 Answers 2016-10-02
I'm reading "The Autobiography of a Seaman" by Thomas Cochrane Dundonald (1860). Prize money is mentioned often, and the writer alludes to some disagreement about the subject.
Their streets abounded with seamen eager to share in anticipated prize-money—for whatever may be the ideas of modern statesmen on this subject, prize-money formed then, as it will ever form, the principal motive of seamen to encounter the perils of war
-- Page 13, Cruise of the Hind
This sparse article alludes to the practice dying out, but mentions no legislation or parliamentary arguments for or against. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prize_money
I wondered if anyone could point me in the direction of who frowned on it, what was done, etc
Thanks in advance
1 Answers 2016-10-02
I recently read The Agony and the Ecstasy and the novel goes out of it way to suggest an unfriendly rivalry between the two. Does this have any basis in fact?
1 Answers 2016-10-02
Say you were staying at a hotel or even lived in an apartment building, I imagine the sharp clicking of the typewriter could often be heard in the next room. Was it ever a problem, or am I incorrectly gauging the level of noise?
1 Answers 2016-10-02
[deleted]
1 Answers 2016-10-02
I recently came across a facebook post in which it was mentioned that Churchill created an artificial famine in the Bengal and Bihar region of the Indian subcontinent by diverting all the crops to Europe to work as buffer during WW2. How factually correct is this? If so, what else is he guilty of during his political career?
Are there such incidents like this after the 1900's that we may not be aware of?
This is my first time asking, so apologies if any posting rules have been broken. Cheers.
1 Answers 2016-10-01
Hi All,
Most of the references that Wiki point to are from books that I don't have.
How true and practicable was this?
Why hasn't the US advertised this far more extensively to justify the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki? It seems like such a large possible event should have far more coverage than just a paragraph on Wikipedia.
Thanks to everybody in advance.
1 Answers 2016-10-01
To make it more specefic, lets put this question in the context of the Antonines. Thanks!
1 Answers 2016-10-01
1 Answers 2016-10-01
Was just wondering if there is data measuring which Southern state many African Americans left and which Northern cities they trended to.
Living in New Jersey, talking to local librarians, I've become very interested in the subject. For example, in Montclair, I was told that most Blacks came from Virginia. But in Trenton, it was predominately Georgia.
I was hoping to find this particular data or wondered if anyone has mapped it.
2 Answers 2016-10-01
Or would it just be silence? Would an operator inform me I've lost connection? Not sure...
1 Answers 2016-10-01
1 Answers 2016-10-01
1 Answers 2016-10-01
1 Answers 2016-10-01
I thought this would be worth asking because the only thread I've been able to find here is three years old. In it, /u/whitesock offers the hypothesis that the change was shaped by shifts in political power and the development of liberalism. But how well-accepted is this theory? Is there a consensus on the question?
2 Answers 2016-10-01