I've been wondering this for a while. It's something you see sometimes, particularly in religious-oriented medieval frescoes. What does it symbolize? Here are 2 examples I could come up with. I know there are more, but here's what I found.
2 Answers 2016-04-14
Post 1945 how has it effected each groups psyke? Obviously the holocaust is a major theme within Judaism as it specifically targeted one group of people for their religion. How has it effected other groups based on religion, race, physical/mental abilities or personal convictions?
2 Answers 2016-04-14
Why is the Mongolian language, both spoken and written, is dramatically different from the Chinese language despite the two civilization's proximity? Yet the Chinese language's influence over the Korean and Japanese languages are evident.
1 Answers 2016-04-14
Hi Reddit, not really sure if I can post it here or somewhere else like /r/military but I thought this is the spot I need to be. first of all, i am a scale modeller and really want to built a Wolverine with these modifications.
I have a question about these blueprints. The ETO ordinance made some special wading kits for the wolverine. And they were used shortly after d-day. Here is a picture of it with this special wading kit. It is the only picture i can find of it https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/89/American_tank_firing.jp.
Is there any information about it? officially it is called the adapter and stack fording kit SPA-10. Are there any names for it or pictures? Is there any institution I need to get into contact for this kind of information?
i've been mailing with the National Archives (CER) and artographic and Architectural Section (CARTO) and the last mentioned gave me the information that I should get in contact with Tank-automotive and Armaments Command (TACOM) but I am not really sure how to get further.
Is there any one who can help me with this? Greetings!
1 Answers 2016-04-14
1 Answers 2016-04-14
1 Answers 2016-04-14
In the AskHistorians FAQ I stumbled upon this post that says:
most contemporary historians tend to agree that it was more likely German commanders felt constrained by their supply lines as they had rapidly advanced through France and the Low Countries faster than their supply lines could keep up as well as German forces wishing consolidating their forces before making a final push
Meanwhile, however, I have heard that, at least in Frieser Karl-Heinz's Blitzkrieg Legend, there is no mention of logistics. The reason, I understand, is not known, with some presumptions that the reason was to wait for the infantry.
So, do or do not historians agree on logistics being the reason? Because if they don't, the FAQ linked comment is erroneous.
2 Answers 2016-04-14
[deleted]
1 Answers 2016-04-14
In the reading I have been doing the Alemmani are often referred to as a germanic tribal confederacy made up to a significant degree of Suebians. I have seen the Macomanni referred to as a separate people who formed a superconfederacy with the Suebians and others. The Quadi are often talked about as migrating alongside the numerous Marcomanni or perhaps as a branch of the Suebi.
Can anyone provide some clarity on these seemingly overlapping venn diagrams of germanic people north of the Upper Rhine and Danube?
1 Answers 2016-04-14
3 Answers 2016-04-14
I can't wrap my head around the fact that the Persians (under Xerxes) lost the battles for Greece. Were the Persian soldiers just generally inferior? Wouldn't then the fact that the Persians had much higher numbers compensate for that fact?
1 Answers 2016-04-14
Why is there such a substantial lack of historical scholarship on Caesar's Commentarii de Bello Gallico between the 1st century BC and the 19th century?
There's suddenly a revived interest in his Comentarii in the twentieth century (with the likes of C.E Stevens, Rambaud, Adkock, J.H. Collins etc) yet there's a notable absence of any such scholarship before the turn of the 20th century. I was hoping someone could clear this up for me. Thanks!
1 Answers 2016-04-14
My stepbrother uses a metal detector on lots of different farms around S.E. England. In the last four years he has found hundreds of thimbles which are mostly mass-produced 18th/19th century ones. There are older ones too, including some irregular hand-made medieval ones called beehives. Why are they there?
I'm also curious how you might research a question like this - I've turned up no hints on Google Books. Metal detecting forums contain various ideas, but all rather speculative.
7 Answers 2016-04-14
For example, did pop culture from the 1930s see renewed interest in the 50s and 60s? I'm also talking about more than just fashion cycles. I mean other forms of media.
1 Answers 2016-04-14
My main curiosity stems from the Canadians taking Juno, with the British on either side. It seems more beneficial to have a larger landing area for the British, that way if they needed more support then they could send them over from the other one, but with Canada in between they would have to ask the Canadians to do it, and go through another armies chain of command, but they obviously didnt do that. why not?
1 Answers 2016-04-14
2 Answers 2016-04-14
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2AkLE4X-bbU
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/(How_Much_Is)_That_Doggie_in_the_Window%3F
So, how much was a doggie in the window?
1 Answers 2016-04-14
Seeing how much there has been talk about the reliability of ww2 tanks, I started to wonder wether modern tanks (1946-1996 for 20-year-rule reasons ofc) are more reliable than their ww2-equilevants? Is there even data enough for comparison as most post-war tanks (if not all) haven't been tested in as long and high-intensity conflict?
1 Answers 2016-04-14
To me this is a very fascinating event that I think effects us even today. I'd like to know more about his assassination and it's myriad effects through out history.
Also curious, what was he like as a person?
1 Answers 2016-04-14
Before the Industrial Revolution and the jobs that were created by factories and technological advancements, what did people do for work? In cities like New York, London, and Paris were there enough jobs to go around? Did everyone have a trade or special skill? Did people work seasonly for short periods of time?
Basically, what did people do in their day to day life and how did the economy function when there was less industry?
1 Answers 2016-04-14
[deleted]
2 Answers 2016-04-14
[deleted]
1 Answers 2016-04-14
I am reading this book and the author keeps referring to people as Iranian when I would think to refer to them as Persian (for example, Zoroastrianism brought to Xinjiang by Iranians, a case brought to the Tang court by an Iranian merchant {this example is in the introduction on the "look inside" on Amazon}, etc). What is the difference between the two terms, and why would the author make this choice of terminology?
1 Answers 2016-04-14
I was reading Barry Goldwater's obit in the Washington Post (here), and this passage struck me as interesting:
"A lot of so-called conservatives today don't know what the word means," he told the Los Angeles Times in a 1994 interview. "They think I've turned liberal because I believe a woman has a right to an abortion. That's a decision that's up to the pregnant woman, not up to the pope or some do-gooders or the religious right. It's not a conservative issue at all."
During the 1990s, Mr. Goldwater spoke out in favor of allowing gays to serve in the military, and he worked in Phoenix to end job discrimination against gays. In 1994, he became honorary chairman of a drive to pass a federal law preventing job discrimination against gays.
"The big thing is to make this country, along with every other country in the world with a few exceptions, quit discriminating against people just because they're gay," he said. "You don't have to agree with it, but they have a constitutional right to be gay. And that's what brings me into it."
So Goldwater's brand of conservatism seem to be much more libertarian. This kinda confuses me because it's often said that he prefigured Reagan's presidency. Other than the obvious fact that Reagan became a household name with his "A Time for Choosing" speech, in what way is this true? I thought the rise of the religious right came with his presidency, so it seems like his brand of conservatism -- or, at least, the brand prominent during his tenure -- is at odds with Goldwater's.
I also know that around this time the southern Democrats were opposed to desegregation. So it seems like our current political map, with the Democrats having a platform of social liberalism and the Republicans having a platform of social conservatism, does not fit the politics of that time period. Roughly when did this shift in platform occur, and what were the forces that drove it?
1 Answers 2016-04-14