Who were the Crips and Bloods of the 20s? Where were they? What did they do? Were they a major threat? Did they even exist?

I just read this on tumblr, which I realize makes it pretty unlikely, but I am curious to know if it's true.

Dear Historians,

I am an amateur writer and historian and I have tried to run down the answer to my questions on my own but it was a no go.

One of my characters is going to a ball and I would like to know what highborn women of the time of the early middle ages ('round about the time of Edward the Confessor, perhaps a little earlier or a little later).

Specifically:

1. How many layers would a woman be wearing if she was a noblewoman?

2. What might she be wearing, if anything, to support her breasts?

3. What would the layers be called (ie. Today a woman might wear undergarments [bra/panties], a shirt, trousers, socks, shoes and maybe a coat)?

4. If she wanted to have a nice vibrant red or a deep blue color what dyes would be needed?

5. What materials /fabrics would be used?

6. How might she wear her hair?

7. Sandels or shoes?

8. Jewelry?

Please and thank you in advance!

Edit: Thank you for all the replies.

As for the clarifications some have asked for. This story is not period set, more like a costume ball set circa 1994, but the character who will be wearing this outfit is a stickler for historical accuracy (just like myself actually).

As for specifics:

The character is 15 years old, unmarried but with a boyfriend, of English origins, white skinned, brown haired.

Thank for your help!

Does anyone have good recommendations for relatively unbiased accounts of the history of prayer in public schools?

I am looking to read up on the subject, but so far I have mostly come across partisan nonsense.

Due to Charlie Hebdo, and Boko Haram etc. I'm curious. What is the history behind the prohibition to the depictions of Mohammed? Were there exceptions within Islam of this? Any information would be handy.

I've also heard that the spread of Iconoclasm within the Eastern Roman Empire was partly due to support from the Islamic World. What's the truth to this? Is this at all influenced due to this Islamic rule?

People tend to romanticize the past; some describe it in a much more flattering light than it likely was in reality. How common was it throughout history to always view the past as 'better' than the present? How misguided is this way of thinking?

I've just begun Stephen Pinker's 'Better Angels of Our Nature' and I'm enjoying the fresh perspective on the current state of things. If I keep reading this, will it discuss the things I'm after, or do any of you have another book in mind?

I'm trying to figure out how a country could get into the shape it's in. I started with the present but the further I go back the less information I can find. An example of one of the questions I'm trying to answer is how could a personality cult like the one we see establish itself? How were people who were alive during the beginnings of the cult not think it was all bullshit?

Hi guys - cheating and writing from my history seminar. A visiting prof made the point that every damn night the Romans built a camp. Is that true or is it one of the myths that just gets propagated as an example of Roman discipline?

I've recently begun reading Kalevipoeg and The Kalevala, but I've begun reading about them as well. I'm aware that they were written in the 19th century, each by a single man (Lönnrot and Kreutzwald) who based their respective stories on folk tales they collected from their regions. So how is it that they managed to create true "epics" out of scattered stories? It seems more likely to me that they based their epics on tales they collected, then filled in the gaps to form a cohesive narrative. But how much, exactly, did they add, and how much was "authentic?" Were they more Tolkien, or more Homer? Were Lönnrot and Kreutzwald even similar to each other? Did one base their work more on authentic folk tales than the other?

I've always wondered why I have to drive down US64 through Roland, OK, or have to drive through Van Buren, AR, and take I-540 south 5-10 miles.

So I've been reading Hitler's Secret Book, and I was wondering if one of you guys could tell me whether it is good for learning about what Nazi Germany's foreign policy was, and in turn whether Hitler actually planned for the war.

I recently found out that churchill thought turing made the biggest contribution to ending World war II which, made me wonder if he knew that Turing was punished for being gay and if he did anything about it.

I'm excluding Patton who died in a car accident and Rommel who was allowed to commit suicide.

Thanks

Marginalizing a monarch seems like one thing, but outright war against the divine Emperor's wishes seems like another entirely.