1 Answers 2015-04-17
I'm arguing with a guy who believes that the Assyrians are descendant of Sumerians, Babylonians and Akkadians. I took some world history I know these people conquer each other but using the word descendant is an over-reach right? In fact Sumerians were conquered by the Elams and Amorities.
2 Answers 2015-04-17
1 Answers 2015-04-17
Hello,
I'm a History major with a concentration in United States History, and I'm curious to know how the one influenced the other. My courses right now are the Early National Period, Antebellum US, and US in the 1920s. We have been focusing mostly on US specific unless it calls for otherwise (US and Mexico in the Mexican War, for example).
2 Answers 2015-04-17
1 Answers 2015-04-17
I'm currently reading Ambedkar's The Untouchables, but I can't shake the feeling that at 80 years, it's rather dated, especially since the subject seems tied to the origin and definition of groups such as Aryans, Dravidians and Nagas, where the general consensus seems to have been fluid the past few decades. Can someone recommend books which are more up to date on the subject? The more comprehensive the better.
1 Answers 2015-04-17
How were British, French, Irish, etc. Other Europeans treated by the Nazi Germans?
We all know of Jesse Owen's lack of congratulations from Hitler, but what else happened between peoples and countries?
2 Answers 2015-04-17
I've heard here and there that Tolkien always hated that William the Bastard bested King Harold at the Battle of Hastings in 1066, because he felt that it prevented a full flourishing of Anglo-Saxon culture and allowed French to "pollute" the language (for more detail on that opinion, scroll to the last section of this post). I have two primary questions:
Q1) To what extent was Tolkien correct that the Norman Conquest prevented a full flourishing of Anglo-Saxon culture by introducing French nobility, ideas, and language to the British Isles?
I always thought it odd that Tolkien, a linguist and scholar, would be so distressed that the Normans upset the Anglo-Saxon applecart, so to speak, when the Angles, Saxons, and other Germanic tribes upset the “native” British applecart. This leads to my second question:
Q2) With respect to the breadth, depth, timeline, and methods of influence: were the arrivals of the Angles/Saxons/other Germanic tribes substantively different than the arrival of the Normans? If so, how? Is Tolkien unfairly bemoaning the French/Norman influence while dismissing the Germanic influence? Perhaps the English penchant for Francophobia is rearing its ugly head here?
I’ve found the following threads that contain similar information, and these are the closest answers I could find, but none of them quite hit the mark I’m aiming at (a comparison between Norman and Anglo-Saxon “disruption”):
What people have said about what Tolkien said about the Norman Conquest
I’m trying at the moment to get some actual primary sources, but no luck yet. I realize it's hard to properly answer Q1 if we can't evaluate Tolkien's precise words, but this is the best I could find using The Great Google.
"Tolkien felt that his true culture had been crushed and forgotten"
"While still a schoolboy he gave a debate-club speech opposing the Norman Conquest."
From the Scull and Hammond The JRR Tolkien Companion and Guide
"Tolkien's antagonism to France, the French and the French language was due, in large part, to his regret that English culture was dislocated and nearly destroyed following the conquest of England by French-speaking Normans in 1066."
A "Straight Dope" forum led me to this [J.R.R. Tolkien Encyclopedia: Scholarship and Critical Assessment] (http://books.google.com/books?id=B0loOBA3ejIC&pg=PA459&lpg=PA459&dq=%22the+very+lexicon+tolkien+uses+in+his+own+fiction%22&source=bl&ots=hhBIeLceXg&sig=azwo3RBI0zd_IoDDri5GjJKa-Vo&hl=en&ei=1fkUTo25CZORgQefucH9BA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CBkQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false)
For Tolkien, the Norman Conquest prevented the survival of a distinctly English language and corrupted the ideal of english life. Indeed, the very lexicon Tolkien uses in his own fiction seeks to moderate the linguistic impact of the Conquest; throughout his work he employs primarily words of Germanic (i.e. Old English) derivation over ones of more recent French or Latin origin
3 Answers 2015-04-17
Applies to any pre-nuclear sub really. It seems like it would be impractical to store it all on-board but venting would give away the sub's position.
2 Answers 2015-04-17
Nongqawuse was Xhosa woman who made prophesy that by destroying crops and cattle, Xhosa will be free from South African colonial depradation. When prophesy failed to came true, estimated 40000 Xhosa died from starvation and others were forced to work under unfair colonial rule. I am curious how Nongqawuse fared afterward.
1 Answers 2015-04-17
Elephants, horses, and dogs seem to be the animals most commonly used by human societies in wars with one another. I've read bits and pieces about rhinoceroses being used in war, and of course there's that famous scene in the 300 movie.
2 Answers 2015-04-17
For instance the name Joshua? Based on Exodus 6:3 It suggests that until Moses the name Yahweh wasn't known to early Jews.
God spoke further to Moses and said to him, “I am the Lord; and I appeared to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, as El Shaddai, but by My name, Yahweh, I did not make Myself known to them.
1 Answers 2015-04-17
If so, what are the best sources to read about what it was like?
1 Answers 2015-04-17
2 Answers 2015-04-17
Other than the Vietnamese and Cham population.
1 Answers 2015-04-17
1 Answers 2015-04-17
1 Answers 2015-04-17
1 Answers 2015-04-17
My grandmother recently found this medal among some of her possessions and believes it could have belonged to my great grandfather.
Does anyone know what it may have been given for?
The bottom stamp on the reverse of the medal says "LP&A"
Thanks in advance!
1 Answers 2015-04-17
We all know that Hitler was the Third Reich, but what were the First and Second? IIRC Charlemagne was the First and Bismark was the Second. Am I correct?
1 Answers 2015-04-17
Today:
You know the drill: this is the thread for all your history-related outpourings that are not necessarily questions. Minor questions that you feel don't need or merit their own threads are welcome too. Discovered a great new book, documentary, article or blog? Has your Ph.D. application been successful? Have you made an archaeological discovery in your back yard? Did you find an anecdote about the Doge of Venice telling a joke to Michel Foucault? Tell us all about it.
As usual, moderation in this thread will be relatively non-existent -- jokes, anecdotes and light-hearted banter are welcome.
19 Answers 2015-04-17