.

Britain excluding Australia.

But also, how much did Australia do after the Nazis were defeated?

Ive read a few of his books, and he certainly goes pretty deep into his own version of history in them. Seeing as, the guy is a pretty respected thinker, I was wondering what actual historians think of him? I realize that this is not the usual type of question that gets asked here, but I didnt know where else to ask.

What reasons were there for the United States to be able to have such a strong economy and industrial power in comparison to the European empires?

Cheaper?

I hear people talk about how food was "healthier" a long time ago, because it didn't have "all the chemicals" in it that we use today. I recently read an except of Upton Sinclair's The Jungle that talks about the horrendous practices of the meat packing industry in the early 20th Century. So this made me wonder, was food healthier/safer for consumption back then or now?

What about air force and navy?

And an optional follow up question: going back further, what would Shakespeare have sounded like?

I'm trying to confirm whether they are the same name or not. Apparently, James is a French variation right before English.

07obNQjXr0Rig3N5Lcj3s40D9ZjiOaeF8FiQtefgSE8h21sGSCcejnObTVh2Xt07obNQjXr0Rig3N5Lcj3s40D9ZjiOaeF8FiQtefgSE8h21sGSCcejnObTVh2Xt07obNQjXr0Rig3N5Lcj3s40D9ZjiOaeF8

Would type of education and job could you get in the 13th and 14th century in England as a average male in his 20's.

As far as I know, the reparation payments were delayed again and again, and only a tiny fraction was ever paid before the treaty was scrapped, so Germany's major economic troubles can't have been caused by that.

Also, it seems to me that the real problem with the way WW1 was concluded was the lack of an occupying force in Germany that could actually enforce the terms.

What I'm mainly wondering about is this: how did the theory of the Treaty putting Germany on the path to a new and almost justified (from the way many speak of it) war of aggression come to be, and why does it seem to be widespread today?

I've read that Yahweh used to be the god of war or thunder (depending on the source) in a polytheistic religion worshipped by ancient Canaanites, but none of my sources backed up their claims with evidence, and this seems very interesting and something I'd like to learn more about.

And it seems that information like this, if true, would be more widely known and used as an argument against the Jewish religions (and the religions that branched off from that such as Christianity and Islam). I actively seek out arguments like this online, but have only seen it used as arguments against the Jewish monotheism a single time without explicitly searching for it.

I was thinking about it and I wasn't really sure what most the people would do for work. Surely there wouldn't be enough room for them all to be farmers out side the city walls, and there couldn't of been a lot stores all competing.