1 Answers 2017-04-11
Did this change over time throughout the empire?
1 Answers 2017-04-11
Did Sparta colonize like other Greek city-states? How similar were these colonies to Sparta itself?
1 Answers 2017-04-11
So everyone knows that the daddy of Communism is Marx and the most well known schools of Marxist thought is Leninism and Maoism. Then you start getting into increasingly more diversified ones. There's Trotskyism, Hoxhaism, Guevarism, Ho Chi Minh Thought, Khrushchevism, Juche, Luxemburgism, on and on.
Communist thought is as rich and diversified as any other school of political thought like Monarchism, Democracy, or Anarchism. So, what are these different schools and how and why did they form?
2 Answers 2017-04-11
Tell me your favorite stories of historical people and groups who beat ALL the odds and refuted ALL the naysayers to triumph (at least for awhile).
Next Week: Out-of-Context Quotes
7 Answers 2017-04-11
[deleted]
1 Answers 2017-04-11
2 Answers 2017-04-11
In Massachusetts, let's say.
2 Answers 2017-04-11
He called it "the whole Austrian scandal" and threatened the Austrians with "sending Hitler's remains home to Austria". Why?
2 Answers 2017-04-11
Some background in case anyone asks: I'm a CA community college student majoring in history as I said, thinking of going to law school (or alternatively teaching if that doesn't pan out; in any case grad school is a consideration for me). I've been at community college three years now due to extenuating circumstances hitting me unexpectedly the final semester of my second year- setting me back another full year; once again now that I'm on the cusp of transferring there's a problem with course requirements, so despite a strong GPA and being accepted everywhere I've applied so far, it seems I'll have to stay another year as schools like UCLA and Cal don't take spring transfers and aren't lenient on letting you fulfill general ed courses over summer.
Obviously very disappointed to have to wait a fourth year at community college so I'm determined to at least do something worthwhile and make myself a stronger candidate next time around. I've foolishly not taken professors who've been impressed with me up on their offers of counsel, but I definitely will now. Before I start asking around the history dept at my school however, I thought I'd shoot the question to AskHistorians; is it possible for just anyone to submit work to a peer reviewed or academic journal for publishing? If so, how would I go about this, what is the process like, which publications should I look to, etc.? What else might I be able to do to pad my resume as a history major specifically this year and make the extended wait worthwhile? (At the moment I volunteer whenever I can at a local 'boutique' history museum/cultural center and plan on applying to another, in addition to the obvious charitable type extra curriculars I do as well).
Edit: I did read the rules but sorry if the question is in some way inappropriate for the sub, thought it would be fine in the spirit of this one which gained a lot of traction; https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/31max0/i_recently_changed_my_major_to_history_in_small/
1 Answers 2017-04-11
Before asking this question, I did my homework and tried to look into this question myself, but the best I've found were homework help websites with little to no sources, and a Wikipedia page almost completely devoid of citations. I'm trying to learn about Latin American history (as it is a part of the world I don't really know anything about), but I'm having trouble investigating this particular event.
1 Answers 2017-04-11
1 Answers 2017-04-11
2 Answers 2017-04-11
This is something that's bugged me for a while, and I'm not sure if I should feel guilty when whistling the tune absent-mindedly.
1 Answers 2017-04-11
I have read that a "pony express" system was used for important government communication. Was this true across the empire? What about mail between regular citizens?
1 Answers 2017-04-11
Over the years, how much has the bible 'evolved'. And who ensures that things are not taken out of context.
1 Answers 2017-04-11
1 Answers 2017-04-11
2 Answers 2017-04-11
My medieval buckler replica, made through old school blacksmithing by a HEMA group, just arrived by mail today. It reminds me of a statement I saw a HEMA practitioner made........
"Weapons are often used in tandem with shields for this reason. The shield bears the brunt of most the attacks, but even then the weapon does a lot of defensive work. If all you have is a weapon, it has to do double duty. Because contrary to what you might think, when you're legally justified to use a weapon, it's because someone is trying to kill you."
I am curious, why is the weapon just as important as the shield is in defensive action? I cannot tell you how people often think of using sword and shield as simple as "wait for the enemy sword to land on your shield, let the sword bounce from impact, and you immediately follow with a strike against your now defensive enemy who's still trying to recover his grip on his sword from the impact".
Seriously popular media portrays it this way from movies such as 300 to video games such as Legend of Zelda and live TV such as Deadliest Warriors. Even and educational sources and serious academic studies portray it this way. Can't tell you how many times I seen the History Channel have people test the effectiveness of a shield by banging swords, warhammers, and other heavy weapons against them and there are videos of university experiments you can see on Youtube where they test a shield's effectiveness in precisely the same manner.
So I am confused.What is meant by the above quote? I mean if scientists and historians with PhDs are saying a shield is enough for defensive action and the sword is pretty much a purely offensive weapon, why is there a need to learn parries, feints, blocks, etc as you stated in your earlier post? I mean real university experiments portray defensive moves with sword and buckler as merely "let it land, bounce off, than follow up with a sword cut or thrust) as universal standard when it comes to discussing about defensive actions!
Is there more to it than simply putting your shield to cover the area that you anticipate will be hit and simply awaiting to hit it while standing still like a stop sign on an intersection?
1 Answers 2017-04-11
Nixon acknowledged and worked with the Communist Chinese government so the two of them could prevent Soviet influence from spreading to Asia, yet when the Soviets invaded Afghanistan they did nothing as far as i am aware.
1 Answers 2017-04-11
Am I able to move around freely without harassment?
Can I get a job?
Can I get an education?
1 Answers 2017-04-11
Has this ever been raised/addressed? I understand that /r/AskHistorians puts an emphasis on accurate and thorough responses, but the length of some responses may limit its audience.
Would asking for a TLDR on responses longer than 1000 words be antithetical to the subs agenda? I love learning about history, but I'm not a historian, which is whom responses seem geared towards.
Eg: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/64l7uh/slavery_was_not_put_into_practice_because_of/
Nearly 2000 words. I abandoned the response except to write this meta post. A TLDR (summarized from the last sentence) "Yes, the designation of specifically black people as slaves institutionalized, magnified and propagated pre-existing ideas of prejudice."
One of my favourite quotes:
I have made this letter longer than usual because I lack the time to make it shorter.
My apologies if isn't the correct place/format for this.
Edit: I should just sub to /r/eli5
7 Answers 2017-04-11